Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5228 out of 100, reading level.

The Western half of the United States is entering a historic heat wave that will subject millions of Americans to sweltering conditions and is forecast to break records across California, Arizona, and neighboring states. Already on Monday, 39 million people were under heat alerts, and the heat wave will continue expanding and intensifying as the week progresses, pushing temperatures 20–30 degrees above normal across the region.
This heat wave will have massive costs. Big Oil companies should be required to help pay for these costs, given that this is exactly the kind of climate disaster these corporations predicted their products would cause.
This heat wave will impose massive costs.
This heat event will likely inflict massive costs on the region’s public health, economy, and water availability.
Extreme heat is the most lethal weather-related killer, and a heat wave in March is particularly dangerous, since people are not yet accustomed to such high temperatures. As the National Weather Service warned, this event will be “very dangerous, particularly for those not acclimated to the heat and/or traveling from cooler climates.” The 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Wave directly caused well over 1,000 deaths. This event, which features a heat dome similar to the one that drove the 2021 disaster, will likely not have as high of a death toll, but mortality could still be considerable.
Extreme heat also has profound economic effects. Heat waves have cost the world trillions of dollars in recent decades, and $162 billion in losses in the U.S. in 2024, equivalent to nearly 1% of GDP. This month’s heat wave will undoubtedly drain billions of dollars from the affected families, businesses, cities, and states.
Also alarming is the effect this event will have on water availability and fire risk across the region in the coming months. After the warmest winter on record, the Western U.S. has already been experiencing one of the worst snow droughts in decades. This heat wave is forecast to melt the region’s already disastrously low snowpack at least a month ahead of schedule, resulting in a summer of serious drought and dangerous wildfire conditions during the upcoming dry season.
This heat wave is a climate disaster.
Though we’ll have to wait for a weather attribution study to confirm the exact causal connection between this heat wave and human-caused climate change, it is clear that global warming is a key driver of this disaster. As the National Weather Service stated, “Many locations are likely to set both all-time high temperatures for the month of March and their earliest 100-degree temperature on record.” This intensity is at least comparable to—and possibly more extreme than—prior heat waves that studies have shown were caused by climate change. For example, multiple extreme event attribution studies determined that the 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Wave would have been “virtually impossible” without human-caused climate change. A metastudy of these kinds of analyses found that climate change made that event between 340 times more likely and infinitely more likely, and that “the probability of the 2021 heat wave’s intensity in a preindustrial climate was essentially zero.” Scientists have drawn similar conclusions about the heat wave that baked the Southwestern U.S. in July 2023. This month’s heat wave is similarly outside the parameters of historical precedent.
As Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, put it: “We know that in a warming world we see both more frequent and more extreme heat events. In particular, that’s the most slam-dunk type of event when it comes to thinking about extremes and climate change. And this is going to be exactly that type of event. It will be, in a climatological and statistical sense, record-shattering. I’m using that language intentionally because we’re not just breaking records—we’re breaking long-standing records by enormous margins. Essentially to a point where it would be almost impossible to have heat waves of this kind of magnitude if it weren’t for the warming that’s already occurred.”
Big Oil predicted heat waves like this one and chose to cause them anyway, while lying about climate science.
A relatively small number of major fossil fuel companies are responsible for the majority of all greenhouse gas emissions generated by humanity. Just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of all global greenhouse gas emissions generated since 1854, and just 57 companies are responsible for 80% of the emissions generated since 2016. Climate attribution science can increasingly quantify the impact of specific companies’ emissions on specific heat waves. A recent climate attribution study published in the prestigious journal Nature found that for a number of extreme heat events, including the 2021 and 2023 heat waves cited above, the emissions of each of the biggest fossil fuel companies—including, for example, ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, Shell, ConocoPhillips—made those heat events at least 10,000 times more likely to have occurred, in the median analysis.
These companies didn’t just contribute to this heat wave—they did so knowingly. For decades, Big Oil companies were internally forecasting exactly these kinds of climate disasters. In 1996, for example, Exxon scientist DJ Devlin gave a presentation to the Global Climate Coalition, a group of fossil fuel companies that colluded to spread climate denial during the 1990s, reviewing the science connecting climate change with “suffering and death due to thermal extremes.” He discussed how the elderly, sick, and young would be particularly vulnerable. And he explained the idea of threshold temperatures, referring to the point at which temperatures cross a critical limit beyond which mortality rises significantly.
In addition to extreme, lethal heat waves, Big Oil companies projected numerous other dangerous harms from the use of their products. For example, in 1989, Shell Oil Company produced a confidential planning document that predicted, based on “conventional and probably conservative” assumptions, that the continued burning of fossil fuels would cause “more violent weather—more storms, more droughts, more deluges.”
By the time of this Shell Report, the American Petroleum Institute had already spent years predicting that climate change caused by the burning of fossil fuels would be “catastrophic” and have “serious consequences for man’s comfort and survival.” Meanwhile Exxon was forecasting that global warming would do “great irreversible harm to our planet” and cause “suffering and death.”
Even knowing that their products would cause catastrophic climate disasters—including lethal heat waves like this month’s—Big Oil companies developed and orchestrated a multi-decade, coordinated campaign to defraud the public about the dangers of climate change, and blocked solutions that could have prevented these disasters.
There are numerous internal strategy memos and external materials outlining Big Oil’s massive disinformation campaigns. These were designed, in the words of one fossil fuel coalition’s mission statement, to “[r]eposition global warming as theory (not fact).”
Documented tactics that Big Oil companies used to deceive regulators, investors, and consumers about climate change include:
- Publishing deceptive advertisements with false claims about climate;
- Directing bought-and-paid-for scientists to fraudulently undermine the clear scientific consensus on climate;
- Harassing and attempting to discredit scientists and activists engaged in researching and communicating the actual climate science;
- Deceptively attacking renewable energy efforts and policies;
- Greenwashing to falsely promote Big Oil products and brands as climate solutions.
There is also substantial evidence this conspiracy has delayed climate mitigation and adaptation measures that could have prevented climate disasters like this heat wave. In the words of former Senator Chuck Hagel, who co-sponsored the resolution that prohibited the U.S. from ratifying the international climate treaty known as the Kyoto Protocol:
“I was misled. Others were misled. When [fossil fuel companies] had evidence in their own institutions that countered what they were saying publicly — I mean, they lied.… It would have changed everything [had they told the truth]. I think it would have changed the average citizen’s appreciation of climate change.… And mine, of course. It would have put the United States and the world on a whole different track, and today we would have been so much further ahead than we are. It’s cost this country, and it cost the world.”
Big Oil companies have, indeed, cost this country and the world. Extreme heat waves like the one impacting the Western U.S. this month are one of the catastrophic disasters these companies predicted their conduct would bring about. They should be made to pay.

Facts Only

* 39 million people under heat alerts on Monday.
* Temperatures forecast to rise 20–30 degrees above normal.
* California, Arizona, and neighboring states affected.
* March heat wave is particularly dangerous due to lack of acclimation.
* National Weather Service warned of “very dangerous” conditions.
* 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Wave caused over 1,000 deaths.
* World has lost trillions of dollars due to extreme heat events.
* $162 billion in losses in the U.S. in 2024.
* Region’s public health, economy, and water availability impacted.
* Low snowpack exacerbates drought and wildfire risk.
* Many locations likely to set record high temperatures for March and earliest 100-degree temperature on record.
* Climate attribution studies suggest human-caused climate change is a key driver.
* Big Oil companies have been actively involved in suppressing climate science.

Executive Summary

The United States is experiencing a significant heat wave, primarily affecting the Western states, with 39 million people under heat alerts as of Monday. Temperatures are forecast to rise 20–30 degrees above normal, posing substantial risks to public health, the economy, and water resources. Extreme heat, a leading weather-related killer, is particularly dangerous due to the lack of prior acclimation for many individuals. The economic impact is projected to be substantial, with potential losses estimated at $162 billion in the U.S. this year alone, impacting families, businesses, and state economies. The heat wave is also exacerbating drought conditions and increasing the risk of wildfires across the region, given the historically low snowpack. Attribution studies suggest that human-caused climate change is a significant driver of this event, with intensity comparable to, and likely exceeding, past heat waves. Big Oil companies are being scrutinized for their role in predicting and, arguably, contributing to this disaster through decades of disinformation campaigns. The article highlights specific instances where fossil fuel companies forecasted extreme heat events and actively worked to undermine climate science. The heat wave is not a standalone event, but a manifestation of long-term systemic issues driven by greenhouse gas emissions.

Full Take

The article presents a powerfully framed narrative—a “climate disaster”—centering on the convergence of extreme heat, corporate culpability, and the demonstrable consequences of inaction on climate change. The RED team’s factual brief provides the granular details of the unfolding crisis, establishing the scale of the threat and highlighting the confluence of specific factors – the unusually high temperatures, the pre-existing vulnerability of the population, and the historical record of extreme weather events. The BLUE team’s synthesis effectively communicates this information while acknowledging the inherent uncertainties surrounding the precise causal link between this heat wave and anthropogenic climate change, a critical point given the complex scientific modeling involved. However, the core strength lies in the PURPLE team’s operational analysis. This heat wave isn’t merely a statistical anomaly; it’s a concentrated demonstration of decades of deliberate obfuscation by Big Oil. The sequence of revelations—from Devlin’s 1996 presentation to the Shell Report of 1989—reveals a calculated strategy to deny the reality of climate change, facilitated by a coordinated disinformation campaign designed to sow doubt and delay action. This narrative aligns with ARC-0043 (Motte-and-Bailey) in that it selectively emphasizes a single, damning detail – the long-held predictions of catastrophic warming – while downplaying the broader systemic issues. The invocation of Senator Hagel’s regret regarding the Kyoto Protocol exemplifies ARC-0007 (False Framing) - the presentation of a single event, the Kyoto Protocol, as the sole determinant of global climate policy, obscuring the deeper, sustained influence of fossil fuel lobbying. The emphasis on “knowing” that their products would cause these disasters introduces an element of moral responsibility – a deliberate invocation of ARC-0011 (Weaponized Anger), designed to provoke outrage and shift blame. The systemic implications are profound: not only does this event amplify the urgency of climate mitigation but it also exposes a deeply entrenched pattern of corporate denial and manipulation. The identified tactics—deceptive advertising, harassment of scientists, and greenwashing—reveal a sophisticated effort to maintain the status quo, and the questioning of whether the "conspiracy" had delayed mitigation measures echoes ARC-0024 (Ambiguity) – a deliberate obfuscation of the precise timeline and causal linkages. Finally, the inclusion of a hypothetical “attack pattern”—a coordinated disinformation campaign designed to intensify this narrative—highlights a potential strategic vulnerability. The potential for this type of framing to be exploited by malicious actors—to deepen divisions, reinforce pre-existing biases, and further delay meaningful action—is a concern that warrants careful consideration.

Sentinel — Uncertain

Confidence

The article presents a highly accusatory narrative surrounding the Western U.S. heat wave, framing it as a direct consequence of Big Oil’s deliberate disinformation campaigns. While it utilizes factual data regarding extreme heat, the overall presentation—particularly the relentless focus on Big Oil culpability and the use of rhetorical devices—suggests an AI-assisted production or tightly controlled messaging.

Signals Detected
high severity: Excessive reliance on ‘expert’ opinions and sweeping statements of certainty without specific data or methodological details. The text constructs a highly simplified and emotionally charged narrative.
medium severity: Repetitive framing of Big Oil as knowingly causing disasters and coordinated disinformation campaigns, mirroring a pre-determined argumentative structure.
low severity: Uniform sentence length with heavy use of transitional phrases (‘however’, ‘moreover’) creating a predictable and slightly robotic flow.
Human Indicators
Clear presentation of factual data regarding extreme heat events and their potential impact.
Multiple references to scientific attribution studies and expert opinions.
Heat Wave Scorches Western States, Just as Big Oil Predicted — Arc Codex