If you invested $10,000 in Bitcoin, Trump meme coin, and gold when Trump took office, here's what you'd have today

January 20, 2025. Donald Trump walks back into the White House. Bitcoin is touching $109,000. Gold is steady at $2,697 an ounce. And a meme coin bearing the president's name is a few days old and trading around $35, already down sharply from its launch peak of $74.
Six months on, those three assets have gone in three completely different directions. Here is what $10,000 in each one looks like today.
Bitcoin: $10,000 becomes $5,880
On inauguration day, Bitcoin opened around $102,000. A $10,000 investment bought roughly 0.098 BTC. Today, with Bitcoin trading near $60,000, that position is worth approximately $5,880, a loss of just over 41%.
The irony runs deep. Trump entered office as the most crypto-friendly president in U.S. history. He signed executive orders supporting the industry, established a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and pushed through the GENIUS Act for stablecoins.
Bitcoin still lost nearly half its value on his watch. Rising Treasury yields, institutional profit-taking, and selling pressure tied to Strategy's $14 billion unrealized loss position have weighed heavily throughout his term.
Related: SpaceX moves Bitcoin amid possible market crash
Gold: $10,000 becomes $15,248
Gold was the quiet winner nobody put in their inauguration-day portfolio. At $2,697 per ounce on January 20, $10,000 bought 3.71 ounces. Today gold trades around $4,110, making that position worth approximately $15,248, a gain of about 52%.
The driver is everything Trump's presidency brought with it: tariff wars, geopolitical tension, U.S.-Iran military strikes, and persistent inflation keeping the Fed cautious. Every time uncertainty spiked, gold climbed. The metal hit an all-time high of $5,597 in January 2026 before pulling back. For an asset dismissed as boring, it has been the standout trade of the cycle.
Trending on TheStreet Roundtable
-
Michael Saylor reveals why Strategy sold Bitcoin and why critics are wrong
-
Billionaire investor reveals key reasons behind Bitcoin's decline
Trump Coin: $10,000 becomes $430
The TRUMP meme coin launched two days before inauguration day and peaked at $74.27 within 48 hours. By January 20 it had already crashed to around $35. A $10,000 investment bought roughly 285 coins. Today those coins are worth approximately $430, a loss of 96%.
Nearly one million people bought the coin. Analytics firm Nansen found that their combined losses total $3.81 billion. Trump himself cleared more than $635 million from the same token. The trade worked out for one side of the table.

Facts Only

* On January 20, 2025, Bitcoin was at $109,000 and gold was at $2,697 per ounce.
* A $10,000 investment in Bitcoin bought approximately 0.098 BTC on inauguration day.
* Gold was purchased for $10,000 and was worth approximately $15,248 by the end of the period.
* A Trump meme coin investment of $10,000 resulted in a value of approximately $430.
* The Bitcoin position became $5,880, a loss of over 41%.
* The Gold position became $15,248, a gain of about 52%.

Executive Summary

A $10,000 investment across Bitcoin, a Trump meme coin, and gold during the period when Donald Trump took office resulted in varied outcomes over six months. In Bitcoin, the investment decreased to $5,880, representing a loss of over 41% from its starting position on the inauguration day. Gold experienced a gain, reaching approximately $15,248, a gain of about 52%, driven by geopolitical tensions and inflation concerns during the presidency. The Trump-related meme coin saw the largest decline, resulting in a value of only $430 from the initial $10,000 investment, a loss of 96%.

Full Take

The divergence in performance across the three assets reveals distinct responses to different underlying forces. Bitcoin's decline reflects broader macroeconomic factors, such as rising Treasury yields and institutional profit-taking, which acted against crypto asset prices despite the political environment. Gold’s appreciation aligns with systemic geopolitical risk and inflationary pressures, positioning it as a hedge against uncertainty. The extreme volatility seen in the meme coin illustrates how speculative, sentiment-driven assets can be highly susceptible to short-term political narratives, leading to massive devaluation divorced from fundamental valuation. The contrast suggests that asset performance during periods of high political change is governed not by direct policy signals alone, but by the interaction between global macroeconomic trends, institutional behavior, and extreme speculative momentum. What assumptions about the relationship between political figures and asset stability are being tested here? How does the structure of incentives for different investors explain why one asset gained while others suffered dramatically?

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

LIKELY_SYNTHETIC (confidence: 0.2)