As the UK and EU debate how to source the vast quantities of electricity they’ll need to power their grand visions of home-grown artificial intelligence (AI), the gas turbine sector is confident that governments will soon follow the lead of the United States – by clearing the way for Big Tech to embrace natural gas.
“Sooner or later there will be a wake-up call for the EU”, said Francesco Ciccola of American gas turbine manufacturer Mitsubishi Power Aero.
DeSmog spoke to Ciccola last month at Datacloud Energy Europe, a tech energy conference dedicated to “defining Europe’s AI power strategy,” held in Brussels, Belgium.
San Francisco-based Global Energy Monitor, a research and advocacy group that tracks global fossil fuel developments tied to data centres, says that Mitsubishi Power Aero is a major provider of turbines for the AI boom in the U.S.
“This new administration in the U.S., they give you a workshop of reality”, said Ciccola, a Europe-based sales director for the manufacturer, which sponsored the conference. “It’s typical, this buffer in time between U.S. and Europe, in everything.”
After the event, Ciccola told DeSmog that “Mitsubishi Power’s mission is to help create a future that works for people and the planet by advancing innovative power solutions that support decarbonization while delivering reliable energy.”
He added: “Any remarks made at Datacloud Energy Europe were intended to describe observed market conditions and customer demand, not to comment on or advocate for any political or regulatory approach.
“Mitsubishi Power Aero operates in full compliance with all applicable permitting, planning, and regulatory requirements in every jurisdiction where we do business. References to differences between markets were descriptive of timing and demand dynamics only.”
Across the U.S., President Donald Trump has championed fossil fuel-powered AI, while tech giants are planning, constructing, and operating their own gargantuan, energy-voracious new AI data center complexes with off-grid gas power plants.
Tech companies including Meta, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Nvidia, and xAI, are currently planning or building out fleets of gas turbines that will generate at least 23 gigawatts (GW) of electricity, according to an analysis by Cleanview – roughly twice as much as New York City uses.
This American AI construction blitz has come at an enormous cost to the climate, skyrocketing the tech industry’s carbon emissions and pushing one tech giant after another to abandon its climate pledges.
Is it now Europe’s turn?
“I just think the American market is ahead of us [and] the same thing is going to happen here”, said a turbine sales representative from UK-based manufacturer Langley Holdings, which also sponsored the March 25-26 Datacloud conference and primarily sells to the UK. “It just will take a bit longer and it will be a bit harder because more people will be saying, ‘hang on a minute, we don’t want to be burning greenhouse gasses.’”
A sales representative from MWM, the European arm of U.S.-based gas generator manufacturer Caterpillar, who asked not to be identified, told DeSmog that the company – another summit sponsor – is “definitely” confident that gas-powered AI will be coming to the UK.
The representative said MWM is working on “numerous” projects in Europe and the UK, each capable of generating up to 100 megawatts (MW). The projects are “getting more concrete” compared to last year, they said, with “actual projects” materialising in Germany and the UK.
MWM and Langley Holdings were approached for comment.
The Datacloud summit came at a pivotal moment. The EU and UK are due to unveil new regulations that will dictate to what extent new AI data centres can construct off-grid gas plants to power their operations – and as gas turbine manufacturers report global order backlogs running to 2030.
Datacloud’s organisers promised that the summit – which involved tech sector and energy leaders, gas turbine industry representatives, and European politicians – would “influence billions in investment” and “reshape regulatory pathways.”
The result was a fierce two-day debate where high-level decision makers in the world of AI and energy fought over whether data centres in Europe will be rolled out with fossil fuels.
“We have to face the reality – there is a real risk of gasification for data centres,” said MEP Nicolás González Casares, a member of the European Parliament Committee on Industry, Research, and Energy. “We cannot gassify this sector. Data centres must become an enabler of the green transition.”
“No planet, no data centre,” said Neal Kalita, senior director of global power and energy at NTT Global Data Centres, the third largest data centre operator in the world. “Being a kind of a continent that develops a digital infrastructure that doesn’t destroy the planet is going to be not just a competitive edge – it’s an imperative.”
Powering Europe’s AI boom with gas, if governments allow it, could decimate net zero goals. A recent analysis by Carbon Brief found that if the UK relies heavily on gas to power data centres, the AI sector would emit 30 metric tonnes of carbon a year by 2035 – as much as the entire country of Denmark. Any increase in emissions will take the UK further away from its goal to cut emissions by 81 percent from 1990 levels by 2035.
The EU’s AI ambitions would demand up to 168 terawatt-hours (TWh) of power by 2030, according to projections by the Kiel Institute – equivalent to what Poland consumes every year. If powered by non-renewables, the report warns, data centres will be putting the EU’s climate goals “at risk.”
Will the gas evangelists win out? Europe is on the cusp of making that decision.
European AI Dash?
Both the UK and the EU have announced plans to triple their AI capacity – in the UK by 2030 and the EU by 2035. The pledges have set off a rush of data centre construction across Europe.
However, years-long wait times to connect new AI data centre projects to electricity grids have pushed many developers to try to skip the queue by requesting direct hookups to gas. In the last year, companies including Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon have pressured the UK government to approve fleets of private gas turbines and generators for their projects in Britain.
In that spirit, off-grid gas-powered data centre projects have begun to crop up across Europe in recent months.
Ireland, which has long embraced data centre development, is emerging as the canary in the coal mine. In 2024, data centres consumed 6,969 gigawatt-hours (GWh), 22 percent of the country’s total electricity consumption. Off-grid gas power is now rolling in to alleviate this energy crunch.
Last month, British off-grid power specialist company AVK, alongside data centre operator Pure Data Centres, announced the completion of the first data centre in Dublin powered by dedicated gas-fired turbines capable of producing 90 MW, enough energy to power 100,000 homes for a year. While AVK says the turbines could theoretically be run on renewable hydro-treated vegetable oil, currently they are running on natural gas as the “primary fuel”. Neither company has given a timeline for the turbines to transition off gas.
Will governments green-light European gas-fired AI projects? Campaigners are concerned about the gas turbine industry’s confidence at this prospect.
“The gas industry evidently sees [European] data centres as a growing market, which is a worrying sign of apparent government apathy towards the climate implications,” said Oliver Hayes, head of big tech at environmental campaign group Global Action Plan. “Using AI as an excuse to breathe new life into destructive oil and gas projects is neither welcome nor wise.”
Gas Powered, Government Approved?
There are indications that Britain may sign on to gas-powered AI, even if it spells calamity for its climate goals.
Future Energy Network, which represents UK pipeline operators, told The Times that seven data centre projects have already been waived through to hook up to the gas grid.
In March, the Labour government gave its approval for a proposed 300 MW gas-powered data centre campus in Wapseys Wood, Buckinghamshire to apply for planning permission as nationally significant infrastructure – which allows projects to bypass the usual local planning requirements.
There are indications that the European public doesn’t support this kind of development. According to an October survey by the campaign group Beyond Fossil Fuels, two-thirds of people in the European Union don’t want data centres powered by fossil fuels.
Europeans “do not want to shoulder the costs” of powering data centres, said Jill McArdle, a campaigner at Beyond Fossil Fuels. She added that the opposition of Americans to sharply rising energy prices “should serve as a warning for Europe.”
“The U.S.-Iran war is exposing European countries’ over-reliance on unstable and expensive foreign imports of fossil fuels”, said McArdle. “Yet Big Tech and the gas [energy equipment] industry are plotting to keep us hooked and grow their profits.”
It may soon become clearer whether EU or UK lawmakers agree. The EU is set to release two new AI regulations in the coming few months: a new law that is expected to include provisions about renewable energy requirements for data centres, and a data centre sustainability rating scheme.
In the UK earlier this year, the Labour government launched an inquiry into the future climate impacts of data centres. Energy and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband has already said these impacts are “inherently uncertain.”
In response to a request for comment, Labour said that its recently-formed AI Energy Council is “exploring opportunities to attract investment and support the development of clean power for data centres”, and that the country’s designation of five “AI Growth Zones” is “driving these partnerships forward.”
This same council pressured the government last year to support off-grid gas for data centres in Britain.
So far, many data centre operators in Europe have avoided reporting their energy usage. A new investigation by Investigate Europe, an independent journalism group, has revealed that U.S. tech companies successfully lobbied the EU two years ago to keep information on the operations of individual data centres secret, including environmental data like energy use and carbon emissions. Only 36 percent of Europe’s data centres submitted any data to a 2025 European Commission report on their energy usage. In the Netherlands, Microsoft and Google have come under fire for failing to report the energy usage of their Dutch data centers to the government.
McArdle said that the UK and EU governments need to intervene to ensure the sector is held to account. “Only regulation and fossil fuel phaseout will protect Europeans from rising energy costs,” she said. “Otherwise, we will pay the price for the reckless profit-making schemes of Big Tech and the gas industry.”
Facts Only
Mitsubishi Power Aero, a U.S.-based gas turbine manufacturer, is a major supplier for AI data centers in the U.S. and is advocating for similar adoption in Europe.
The Datacloud Energy Europe conference in Brussels, held March 25-26, 2025, focused on defining Europe’s AI power strategy and included gas turbine industry representatives, tech leaders, and European politicians.
U.S. tech companies, including Meta, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Nvidia, and xAI, are planning or building gas-powered data centers totaling at least 23 GW of electricity capacity.
A Cleanview analysis indicates this U.S. AI construction boom is increasing tech industry carbon emissions, leading some companies to abandon climate pledges.
In Europe, data center energy demand is surging, with Ireland’s data centers consuming 22% of the country’s electricity in 2024.
AVK and Pure Data Centres completed Ireland’s first gas-powered data center in Dublin, capable of producing 90 MW, with no timeline for transitioning off natural gas.
The UK government has approved a 300 MW gas-powered data center campus in Buckinghamshire as nationally significant infrastructure, bypassing local planning requirements.
The EU is expected to release new AI regulations, including renewable energy requirements for data centers and a sustainability rating scheme.
A 2024 survey by Beyond Fossil Fuels found that two-thirds of EU residents oppose fossil fuel-powered data centers.
U.S. tech companies successfully lobbied the EU to keep individual data center energy usage data secret, with only 36% of Europe’s data centers reporting data for a 2025 European Commission report.
The Kiel Institute projects that EU AI ambitions could require 168 TWh of power by 2030, equivalent to Poland’s annual consumption.
The UK Labour government’s AI Energy Council has pushed for off-grid gas support for data centers while also exploring clean power investments.
Executive Summary
The debate over how to power Europe's rapidly expanding AI infrastructure is intensifying, with gas turbine manufacturers pushing for natural gas as a solution, mirroring trends in the U.S. where tech giants like Meta, Google, and Microsoft are already constructing gas-powered data centers. At a recent conference in Brussels, industry representatives expressed confidence that Europe will follow the U.S. model, despite concerns from policymakers and environmental groups about the climate impact. The EU and UK are set to unveil new regulations that will determine whether data centers can use off-grid gas plants, with projections suggesting such a move could severely undermine climate goals. For instance, if the UK relies heavily on gas, AI-related emissions could match Denmark's annual output by 2035. Meanwhile, public opposition is growing, with surveys showing most Europeans reject fossil fuel-powered data centers. The situation is further complicated by lobbying efforts from tech companies to keep energy usage data secret, raising accountability concerns. Governments are now at a crossroads, balancing AI expansion with climate commitments and public sentiment.
The tension reflects broader challenges in aligning technological growth with sustainability. While gas turbine manufacturers frame their solutions as necessary for energy reliability, critics argue that fossil fuel dependence risks derailing net-zero targets. The outcome of upcoming EU and UK regulations will likely set a precedent for how AI infrastructure is powered globally, with significant implications for emissions, energy costs, and corporate accountability.
Full Take
The narrative here hinges on a classic tension between technological progress and environmental responsibility, but the framing reveals deeper patterns worth scrutinizing. At its core, this is a story about industry lobbying, regulatory capture, and the weaponization of urgency—where the "inevitability" of AI expansion is used to justify fossil fuel dependence. The gas turbine manufacturers’ confidence isn’t just market optimism; it’s a calculated bet that governments will prioritize short-term energy reliability over long-term climate goals, a pattern seen in other sectors where incumbents frame their solutions as the only pragmatic choice (ARC-0024 Ambiguity: "We’re just describing market demand"). The U.S. precedent is wielded as both a cautionary tale and a blueprint, with industry representatives dismissing European resistance as a temporary "buffer in time" (ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey: "We’re not advocating, just observing").
What’s missing from this debate is a rigorous interrogation of the false binary between "AI growth" and "climate collapse." The assumption that gas is the only viable bridge fuel ignores advances in energy storage, grid modernization, and demand-side management. The secrecy around data center energy use—achieved through lobbying—also fits a pattern of corporate evasion (ARC-0012 Evasion: hiding inconvenient data behind procedural barriers). Meanwhile, the public’s opposition to fossil fuel-powered data centers is treated as a hurdle to overcome rather than a democratic mandate to heed.
The root cause isn’t just energy demand; it’s the unchecked power of tech and fossil fuel industries to shape policy narratives. If governments green-light gas-powered AI, the beneficiaries will be equipment manufacturers and Big Tech, while the costs—climate damage, energy price volatility, and public distrust—will be socialized. The second-order consequences could include a lock-in effect, where gas infrastructure built today becomes a stranded asset tomorrow, or worse, a justification for delaying renewable transitions.
Bridge questions: What would a truly decarbonized AI infrastructure look like, and what policy levers could make it viable? How much of this "energy crisis" is manufactured by industry resistance to efficiency standards? And if the U.S. model is so flawed, why are European policymakers even entertaining it as a template?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign would amplify the "no alternative" framing, suppress public opposition data, and portray gas as a "clean" transition fuel. The article’s content aligns with this playbook in parts—especially the industry confidence and regulatory lobbying—but it also includes critical voices and public pushback, suggesting a more nuanced discourse. No full match detected.
Sentinel — Human
LIKELY_HUMAN (confidence: 0.15)
