Jul 20, 2026
Sam Lyman is the head of research at the Bitcoin Policy Institute and formerly was a senior advisor and speechwriter for Treasury Secretary Bessent. In Sam’s first appearance on the show, he discusses Secretary Bessent’s secret skill, the competition in the digital payments space between the US and China, why the strategic Bitcoin reserve is important, what the future of Bitcoin holds, where things stand with the CLARITY Act, the Q Day conundrum, whether Satoshi Yakamoto is alive or dead, where Sam thinks the anti-AI sentiment is coming from, and much more.
Watch the full length video on our new YouTube Channel!
Check out the transcript for this week’s episode, now with links.
Recorded on May 21st, 2026
Subscribe to David's Substack: Macroeconomic Policy Nexus
Follow David on X: @DavidBeckworth
Follow Sam on X: @SamLyman33
Follow the show on X: @Macro_Musings
Check out our Macro Musings merch!
Timestamps
00:00:00 - Intro
00:00:49 - Sam’s Career
00:05:37 - Nation-States and Digital Payments
00:14:40 - Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
00:18:29 - Future of Bitcoin
00:24:27 - Bitcoin vs. Dollar-Based Stablecoins
00:38:32 - Update on the CLARITY Act
00:44:48 - Quantum Computing
00:49:34 - Satoshi Yakamoto
00:52:20 - Foreign Campaign Against AI
00:57:44 - Outro
Facts Only
* Sam Lyman is the head of research at the Bitcoin Policy Institute.
* Sam Lyman was a senior advisor and speechwriter for Treasury Secretary Bessent.
* The discussion covers competition in the digital payments space between the US and China.
* The strategic Bitcoin reserve is discussed as important.
* The future of Bitcoin is addressed.
* A comparison is made between Bitcoin and dollar-based stablecoins.
* There is an update regarding the CLARITY Act.
* Quantum computing is mentioned.
* The status of Satoshi Yakamoto is questioned.
* Anti-AI sentiment is analyzed for its source.
Executive Summary
Full Take
Sentinel — Human
This text appears to be metadata or promotional material derived from a recorded interview, characterized by listing names, topics, and links rather than analytical argumentation.
