Ramp Accounts Receivable, announced Tuesday (Sept. 22), allows the FinTech’s clients to use Ramp to manage both costs and revenue.
“This has been a top request from our customers,” Geoff Charles, chief product officer at Ramp, said in a news release.
“Finance teams today spend too much time chasing payments for outstanding invoices. Ramp’s AI turns contracts into ready-to-review invoices, prepares informed follow-ups, and matches payments back to the books.”
The release argues that for most businesses, accounts receivable information is spread across contracts, purchases, spreadsheets, email threads and bank teams, creating a host of manual work for finance teams, as well as opportunities for delays and error.
“Ramp Accounts Receivable automates the full invoice-to-cash workflow so businesses get paid faster,” the company said.
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
Finance teams can now create invoices without manual entry, draft quicker follow-ups and have an easier time matching payments to invoices.
The company argues this is particularly important when — per Federal Reserve data — 56% of small businesses say paying operating expenses is difficult and 51% wrestle with uneven cash flow, meaning that a “single late payment can make it harder to pay bills or make payroll.”
Meanwhile, research by PYMNTS Intelligence shows that one-third of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) continue to rely on manual accounts receivable (AR) processes, which create friction and delays even in cases where the underlying payment rail is fast. Beyond that, 32% of businesses point to payment speed as a major pain point, yet many remain married to legacy systems like paper checks because of perceived cost savings.
“However, the tide is turning as the true cost of payment delays becomes clearer,” PYMNTS wrote earlier this year.
“Thirty-five percent of SMBs now explicitly state they are willing to pay fees for instant payments because the stability of their cash flow outweighs the transaction cost. Digitally forward industries are leading this charge, receiving 41% of their payments instantly compared to just 30% for less tech-savvy sectors.”
Ramp’s news release added that this launch follows the company’s announcement last week it was opening its corporate cards, expense management, bill pay and accounting automation to businesses in the U.K.
“The UK is home to some of the fastest-growing companies in Europe, and we built our product to match that,” Jacob Wallenberg, vice president for international expansion at Ramp, said in the announcement. “We have a team based right here in London and we can’t wait to get to work.”
For all PYMNTS B2B coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B Newsletter.
Facts Only
* Ramp Accounts Receivable allows clients to manage costs and revenue.
* The feature automates the invoice-to-cash workflow.
* Finance teams spend time chasing payments for outstanding invoices.
* The system turns contracts into ready-to-review invoices.
* It prepares informed follow-ups.
* It matches payments back to the books.
* Finance teams can create invoices without manual entry.
* Teams can draft quicker follow-ups.
* Teams have an easier time matching payments to invoices.
* 56% of small businesses find paying operating expenses difficult.
* 51% of small businesses wrestle with uneven cash flow.
* One-third of SMBs rely on manual accounts receivable processes.
* 32% of businesses point to payment speed as a major pain point.
* 35% of SMBs are willing to pay fees for instant payments.
* 41% of digitally forward industries receive payments instantly compared to 30% in less tech-savvy sectors.
Executive Summary
Ramp Accounts Receivable introduces a feature allowing clients to manage costs and revenue using Ramp. The service automates the invoice-to-cash workflow, aiming to accelerate payment collection. This addresses the manual workload finance teams face when tracking outstanding invoices across various sources like contracts, spreadsheets, emails, and bank records. The company argues this automation is necessary because finance teams spend significant time chasing payments, which creates opportunities for delays and errors.
The push for this feature is contextualized by financial pressures on small businesses, where 56% find paying operating expenses difficult and 51% struggle with uneven cash flow, making late payments a significant risk. Research indicates that one-third of small and medium-sized businesses still rely on manual accounts receivable processes, which introduce friction despite fast payment rails. Furthermore, while payment speed is a major pain point for 32% of businesses, many remain tied to legacy systems due to perceived cost savings. A shift is occurring as the true cost of payment delays becomes clearer, with 35% of small and medium-sized businesses willing to pay for instant payments due to cash flow stability.
Full Take
The narrative positions manual accounts receivable processes as an inherent source of friction and delay, framing the solution as a necessary evolution driven by financial necessity rather than mere efficiency gains. The core tension lies between legacy inertia—where cost savings justify sticking to manual methods despite existing payment infrastructure—and the emergent economic reality where cash flow stability dictates payment prioritization. The data shifts the frame from simple transactional speed to systemic risk: late payments directly impede survival for small businesses. The introduction of Ramp’s solution, therefore, is not just about automating tasks but about mitigating financial vulnerability imposed by inefficient administrative processes.
The pattern suggests a predictable trajectory: as macroeconomic pressures (cash flow struggles) become more salient, the perceived cost of friction in operations must be re-evaluated against the cost of the solution. The pivot to digital payment acceptance among forward-looking sectors demonstrates that the willingness to absorb transaction costs is directly correlated with the stability of cash flow outcomes. The implication for broader business systems is that features addressing workflow inefficiency are not discretionary luxuries but foundational requirements when operational uncertainty is high. The system appears to be moving from an era where efficiency was a secondary concern to one where resilience, achieved through predictable cash flow management, is paramount.
Bridge Questions: If the focus shifts entirely to payment speed as the primary driver for adoption, how does the argument shift concerning the role of transaction cost versus systemic risk? What are the long-term effects on finance training and skill sets if these processes become entirely automated? Does the focus on SMBs adequately capture the impact felt by larger entities that manage complex, fragmented operational flows?
Sentinel — Human
The text reads like a combination of corporate press material and synthesized reporting referencing specific financial statistics, suggesting human sourcing combined with structured data integration.