Periodistes d’À Punt que van cobrir la gota freda declaren que es van haver de refugiar a un terrat

15.07.2026 - 14:28
|
Actualització: 15.07.2026 - 14:35
Els meteoròlegs d’À Punt van viure amb temor els dies previs a la gota freda del 2024, perquè creien que “venia una cosa molt grossa”. Així ho ha declarat a la jutgessa que instrueix la causa sobre la gestió de la gota freda un dels dos periodistes d’À Punt citats aquest matí com a testimonis. Són dos periodistes que aquell dia van treballar cobrint les inundacions, i que van ser enviats a informar des de pobles afectats.
Segons que ha explicat el periodista Paco Miguel, va discutir amb la cap sobre a quin lloc havien d’anar i finalment optaren per desplaçar-se a Catarroja pensant que “no passaria res”, que “només enregistrarien imatges al carrer”, segons fonts coneixedores de la declaració. Un cop allà van començar a enregistrar imatges i a intentar fer connexions en directe amb la televisió i la ràdio, però la llum se’n va anar i ja no va ser possible. Posteriorment, van perdre també la connexió per mòbil i no van poder contactar amb ningú.
Segons que ha explicat, tot el moviment de salvament es va produir abans de les 20.00 i, a partir d’aleshores, va ser qüestió de “resistir”. Va afegir que es va sentir “com un ban” però que no en va entendre el missatge. La companya que l’acompanyava com a càmera, Maje Jorge, ha dit que un xic els va oferir refugi i que van poder enregistrar imatges des d’aquell espai. També ha relatat que, quan arribaren a Catarroja, l’aigua ja circulava pels carrers i que, en molt pocs minuts, havia assolit una alçada de tres metres.
Ha dit que li va estranyar quan va rebre l’Es Alert, a les 20.11, i que feia una hora que enregistrava des del terrat. Quan va arribar el missatge, ha afegit, no tenien ni cobertura ni llum.

Facts Only

* Meteorologists from À Punt feared a cold snap in 2024.
* Two À Punt journalists were cited as witnesses in a court case concerning the management of the cold snap.
* The journalists were working on flood coverage and informing people from affected towns.
* Journalists planned to go to Catarroja, expecting no events, and only record street images.
* Journalists attempted live connections but lost signal and contact.
* The rescue movement occurred before 20:00, after which the situation required "resisting."
* One journalist felt as if they were in a bath but did not understand the message.
* A cameraman provided shelter and recorded images from a specific area.
* Water was flowing in Catarroja streets upon arrival.
* Water level rose by three meters in a few minutes.
* The journalist received an alert at 20:11, with no coverage or light available.

Executive Summary

Meteorologists from À Punt feared a severe cold snap in 2024, believing something significant was approaching. Two À Punt journalists were cited by a court investigating the management of the cold snap as witnesses. These journalists were covering floods and informing people from affected towns. One journalist reported that they decided to go to Catarroja, assuming nothing would happen, and only record images from the street. They attempted live connections but lost signal and contact. The rescue movement occurred before 20:00, after which the situation became about "resisting." One journalist felt like being in a bath but did not understand the message. A cameraman offered some shelter and recorded images from that space. Upon arrival in Catarroja, water was already flowing in the streets, and a three-meter rise occurred in a short time. The journalist was surprised to receive an alert at 20:11, noting they had no coverage or light when the message arrived.

Full Take

The narrative presents a tension between anticipated threat, the reality of immediate crisis, and the breakdown of communication channels during an emergency. The initial fear expressed by meteorologists contrasts sharply with the journalists' experience of being blindsided by rapid, tangible disaster when they sought to document it. The transition from recording images and attempting contact to complete loss of signal underscores a theme of technological failure intersecting with acute physical danger. The reported experience of feeling submerged ("como un ban") juxtaposed against the objective measurement of water rising demonstrates how subjective human experience interacts with objective environmental reality during catastrophic events. Furthermore, the contrast between prior meteorological warnings and the actual onset of flooding highlights a gap in predictive certainty that remains a fundamental uncertainty in hazard management. The silence following the alert—no coverage or light when the warning arrived—suggests systemic vulnerabilities not just in infrastructure, but in the reliability of the information pipeline itself during high-stress scenarios. This process reveals how external warnings must translate into actionable reality, and where critical failures occur in that translation, impacting the agency of those attempting to respond and record events.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text appears to be a factual recounting of an interview or testimony regarding a specific event, exhibiting the typical structure of news reporting based on direct accounts.

Signals Detected

Sentence length variance shows natural variation; vocabulary is journalistic but flows contextually.

The narrative structure follows a clear account of an event and subsequent testimony, exhibiting a logical flow characteristic of reportage.

No overt pattern matching to known templates; the focus is on direct testimony rather than broad synthesis.

Specific details (times, names, quotes) suggest grounded reporting, though context regarding 'sources' remains generalized.

Human Indicators

The text employs direct quotes and reconstructs a narrative based on specific testimonial accounts, suggesting journalistic sourcing rather than pure generative synthesis.