The Download: Chinese AI divides the White House, and a record copyright payout

Plus: Anthropic's record $1.5 billion copyright settlement has been approved.
This is today's edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what's going on in the world of technology.
China’s AI models have Trump’s AI world at war with itself
Last weekend, several current and former advisers to President Donald Trump on AI publicly lobbed insults at the country’s leading AI companies. David Sacks branded Anthropic’s models “lobotomized” and “woke.” Emil Michael, a top Pentagon official, called OpenAI’s new head of strategic futures a “supreme village idiot.”
It began because no one can agree on what to do about Kimi, a free, open-source model that Chinese AI company Moonshot launched last week. It appears to rival the intelligence of models from OpenAI and Anthropic, which are very much not free.
Every time a new smart, free model from China gets released, US companies see less reason to fork out money for models from Anthropic or OpenAI. That’s creating economic and political problems for the president—and dividing the top AI strategists in his orbit.
Read the full story on why no one can agree what to do about Kimi.
—James O'Donnell
This article is from The Algorithm, our weekly AI newsletter. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Monday.
The must-reads
I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.
1 Anthropic's record $1.5 billion copyright settlement has been approved
The plaintiffs said Anthropic used pirated works to train Claude. (Reuters $)
+ And won the largest known copyright payout in history. (Engadget)
+ Yet many authors and creators still don’t view it as a win. (TechCrunch)
+ But AI copyright anxiety could limit creativity. (MIT Technology Review)
2 The Trump administration is weighing a ban on Chinese AI models
The launch of Kimi K3 has revived calls for restrictions. (Axios)
+ But officials are divided on the proposals. (Fast Company)
+ China’s bet on open-source is paying off. (MIT Technology Review)
3 China is mulling tighter export controls on AI models and chips
It wants to stop the West from acquiring its tech and startups. (FT $)
+ Beijing has held talks with tech firms about potential restrictions. (Reuters $)
4 Trump’s AI safety head has resigned after just three months
Chris Fall had led CAISI, the federal AI Safety Institute, since April. (Axios)
+ No reason was given for his exit. (CNBC)
5 Google is working on a new chip to run Gemini models more efficiently
The chip, called “Frozen V2,” may be deployed in 2028. (Information $)
+ Alphabet stock popped on the report. (CNBC)
6 New Orleans police have explored arming drones with weapons
A draft drone manual paves the way for weaponised quadcopters. (404 Media)
+ Shoplifters could soon be chased by drones. (MIT Technology Review)
7 The EU has handed AliExpress a record fine over unsafe product sales
The €550 million fine is the largest-ever under the Digital Services Act. (BBC)
+ Alibaba has vowed to appeal the fine. (SCMP)
8 Election advice from AI chatbots is “inaccurate and unreliable”
That’s the conclusion from tests in Hungary earlier this year. (Guardian)
9 Red light therapy is showing promise for healing and healthy aging
Better skin and reduced vision loss are also on the cards. (Economist $)
10 Neill Blomkamp’s new horror clip is all AI-generated—and it sucks
The acclaimed director wants to make “a full feature in this format.” (Gizmodo)
Quote of the day
“This would be a terribly self-defeating form of intervention if it were to happen.”
—Tech investor Chamath Palihapitiya slams plans to restrict Chinese AI models in a post on X.
One More Thing
Inside Chicago’s surveillance panopticon
Early on the morning of September 2, 2024, four people were shot and killed on a westbound train in Chicago. Police swiftly activated a digital dragnet—a surveillance network that connects thousands of cameras across the city—and arrested the suspect just 90 minutes later.
Law enforcement and security advocates say this vast monitoring system protects public safety and works well. But activists and many residents say it's a surveillance panopticon that creates a chilling effect on behavior and violates guarantees of privacy and free speech.
Go inside the surveillance network that’s dividing Chicago.
—Rod McCullom
We can still have nice things
A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)
+ NASA has shared a stunning timelapse video of the Psyche spacecraft's view of Mars.
+ This comparison of American and European Urbanism shows good city design is a choice.
+ Musician Luca Stricagnoli recently performed a marvellous acoustic guitar medley of Prodigy songs.
+ Two Australian paddleboarders saved a stranded wallaby after it was swept out to sea—and caught the whole rescue on video.
Deep Dive
The Download
The Download: Claude’s inner workings and OpenAI’s “super app”
Plus: OpenAI has unveiled its long-awaited "super app."
The Download: Claude’s inner workings, and the future of world models
Plus: New York has become the first state to enact a data center moratorium.
The Download: the future of chipmaking and Anthropic’s government clash
Plus: Meta is pausing an AI training program that tracks workers’ keystrokes.
The Download: AI hacking beyond Mythos, and chatbots’ impact on our brains
Plus: Anthropic has called for a global slowdown in AI development.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Facts Only

* Several current and former advisers to President Donald Trump publicly criticized leading AI companies.
* David Sacks branded Anthropic’s models “lobotomized” and “woke.”
* Emil Michael, a Pentagon official, called OpenAI’s new head of strategic futures a “supreme village idiot.”
* The dispute originated over Kimi, a free, open-source model launched by the Chinese AI company Moonshot.
* The release of new, smart, free models from China reduces US companies' incentive to invest in Anthropic or OpenAI models.
* China is considering tighter export controls on AI models and chips to restrict Western acquisition.
* Anthropic achieved a record $1.5 billion copyright settlement related to training Claude.
* The EU fined AliExpress €550 million for unsafe product sales under the Digital Services Act.
* Chris Fall resigned from leading the federal AI Safety Institute after three months.
* Google is developing a chip named “Frozen V2” for Gemini models, potentially deployed in 2028.

Executive Summary

The conflict involves a divergence in the AI landscape driven by the release of new, free, and open-source models from China, specifically Kimi. This development has caused friction among US AI strategists and advisors who hold differing views on how to respond. Some figures have publicly criticized leading AI companies from Anthropic and OpenAI, referencing the emergence of Chinese alternatives like Kimi. Economically, the rise of free, accessible models challenges the market viability of proprietary models like those from Anthropic and OpenAI. Furthermore, there is ongoing geopolitical tension regarding technology transfer, evidenced by China’s consideration of tighter export controls on AI models and chips, aimed at restricting Western acquisition. Separately, the discussion encompasses significant events like Anthropic's record copyright settlement, regulatory actions by the EU concerning product safety fines, and internal shifts within US AI leadership, such as a recent resignation in the AI safety field.

Full Take

The narrative presents a friction point between rapid, open-source technological proliferation and established geopolitical and economic interests in the AI sector. The core tension lies in the decoupling of model access—where accessible, free models from China challenge the dominance and proprietary structure of Western-aligned entities like Anthropic and OpenAI. This dynamic creates internal division among US AI strategists, suggesting that a singular strategic response to this technological shift is elusive because the perceived threat operates on multiple vectors: economic competitiveness, national security concerns regarding technology control (export controls), and philosophical debates about AI safety and creativity.
The pattern observed is the pressure exerted by competing global technological trajectories forcing an internal re-evaluation within a dominant geopolitical sphere. When external forces successfully introduce viable alternatives (like Kimi) that undermine the cost structure or perceived exclusivity of existing proprietary systems, it generates friction not just between corporations but also within government advisory circles concerning strategic direction. The context suggests that technological competition is rapidly translating into political and philosophical disagreements about what constitutes acceptable innovation and security boundaries.
What are the assumptions driving the polarization among strategists? Is the division rooted in differing views on the value of open-source access versus proprietary control, or in a fundamental disagreement over which external forces should dictate the pace and direction of AI development? If the outcome is determined by external competitive pressures rather than internal consensus, what mechanisms can be established to align strategic goals when these goals are inherently contradictory? What happens when the economic imperative for competitive advantage clashes with concerns over global technological sovereignty?

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text exhibits characteristics of carefully curated journalistic synthesis rather than raw generation, demonstrating a cohesive narrative flow typical of an editorial publication.

Signals Detected

Sentence length variance is noticeable, with shifts between narrative setup and list formatting.

The text successfully weaves disparate topics (AI politics, copyright law, a specific crime report) into an interconnected newsletter format, showing editorial intent.

The structure strongly mimics a newsletter/curated content delivery system, using clear signposting (Must-reads, Deep Dive).

Specific data points and source attributions (e.g., $1.5 billion settlement, specific names like David Sacks) appear grounded, suggesting sourcing rather than pure hallucination.

Human Indicators

The presence of distinct, opinionated commentary in the 'Quote of the day' section suggests a human editorial voice.

The juxtaposition of high-level political/economic speculation with lighter lifestyle items indicates a curated editorial choice typical of a newsletter.