Is Vine back? Short-form video-sharing app Divine opens to public
- Published
A new app seen as a spiritual successor to short-form video service Vine has been released to the public.
Much like the original, Divine lets users create and share videos which are just six seconds long and repeat on a loop.
The new app also hosts more than two million original Vine videos and - in a bid to further distance itself from other platforms - bans content made by AI.
Divine's founder, former Twitter employee Evan Henshaw-Plath, told the BBC he wanted to create the app because he felt social media needed "a reset".
"I want to see it rival other apps because I think we have gone awry," he said in an interview a few weeks before the public launch.
He said it was important that there was no AI-generated content on Divine, adding he was "sick and tired of seeing videos and not knowing whether it was real".
"I want to be able to have fun and not have to second guess these things," he said.
At its peak, Vine had more than 200 million monthly active users and helped launch the careers of some of the internet's biggest stars.
Jake Paul and Lele Pons are two of those who made their names on the platform before it was shut down by its owner Twitter in 2017.
Divine is backed by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, who had a senior role at the social media platform when it purchased the Vine in 2012.
It is built on a decentralised system called Nostr, meaning it is not controlled by a single company in the same way as platforms such as TikTok or Instagram.
This means users can potentially take their accounts and content with them to other services that use the same system, rather than being locked into one platform.
A similar approach has been used by X rivals Bluesky and Mastodon.
Divine's website FAQs, external outlines several ways for the platform to ensure all videos on the app are human-made, without AI involvement.
For example, users have to record videos live in the app, rather than uploading from elsewhere, and it will use a verification tool called ProofMode - which works like a digital receipt for a piece of media.
When users record something using a device with ProofMode, it can attach information which helps verify elements such as when it was recorded and whether the file has been altered since.
Users will also be able to flag suspected AI content, and automated systems as well as humans will be involved in looking for signs of the tech.
Divine's attempt to do things differently could also be its biggest challenge, according to social media analyst Matt Navarra.
"The mechanisms people dislike about modern social media are often the same that made those platforms extraordinarily good at keeping people there," he said.
"So Divine now has to prove you can remove some of the addiction without removing the magic."
Aside from its new content and features, the treasure trove of old Vines created by some of the platform's biggest stars could well be a draw for those who remember their first time around (and around).
Henshaw-Plath said he initially set out to simply recreate Vine's short-video format, but then wondered if he could bring back its old videos too.
He discovered the Internet Archive had preserved a copy of Vine's data and spent months reconstructing it.
"I was like, oh, this is really cool," he said, initially expecting only a few thousand people to be interested.
Instead, 10,000 people installed the app within its first few hours, overwhelming its servers.
"That's when I went, oh, there's something more here," he said.
As to why people may still have interest in short-form content when many apps such as YouTube and TikTok have moved towards much longer videos, he compared Vine's format to the haiku.
"We could do free-form prose," he said.
"Yet poetry is a form in which we value and which has meaning. And so there's many ways in which Vine was poetry."
The challenge for Divine is to turn that nostalgia into something that works for a new generation of social media users.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Related topics
- Published17 January 2017
Facts Only
* Divine is a short-form video-sharing app released to the public.
* Users create looping videos six seconds in length.
* The platform hosts over two million original Vine videos.
* AI-generated content is banned on the app.
* Founder Evan Henshaw-Plath is a former Twitter employee.
* Jack Dorsey, Twitter co-founder, provides financial backing.
* The app is built on the decentralized Nostr system.
* ProofMode is used as a verification tool for media.
* Users must record videos live within the app rather than uploading files.
* 10,000 people installed the app within its first few hours.
Executive Summary
Divine has launched as a decentralized spiritual successor to Vine, focusing on six-second looping videos and a strict prohibition of AI-generated content. Founded by former Twitter employee Evan Henshaw-Plath and backed by Jack Dorsey, the platform seeks to "reset" social media by utilizing the Nostr protocol. This architectural choice allows users to potentially move their accounts and content between different services, contrasting with the closed ecosystems of TikTok or Instagram.
To ensure human-made content, Divine requires live in-app recording and employs ProofMode to provide digital receipts of media authenticity. The platform also leverages nostalgia by incorporating millions of archived Vine videos. However, the project faces a significant tension: it aims to remove the "addictive" mechanisms of modern social media while attempting to maintain the "magic" that drives user retention. Whether a commitment to authenticity and decentralization can compete with the algorithmic scale of established giants remains an open question.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is that Divine represents a principled rebellion against the "dead internet theory," where AI-generated sludge and centralized algorithmic control erode human connection. By combining the nostalgia of the "Vine era" with the technical sovereignty of Nostr, it attempts to return social media to a tool for human expression rather than a machine for attention extraction.
The root cause of this movement is a growing cultural exhaustion with synthetic media. There is an unstated assumption that "human-made" is inherently more valuable and that decentralization automatically equates to liberation. This echoes the early optimism of the web—the belief that a change in architecture can fundamentally alter human behavior.
The implications for human agency are positive if the model succeeds, as it decouples identity from corporate ownership. However, the second-order consequence may be a fragmented "boutique" internet where authenticity is gated by specific technical protocols, creating silos of "verified humans" versus the general population.
Patterns detected: none
If this were a coordinated influence campaign, a bad actor would use "nostalgia-baiting" and "anti-AI" sentiment to lure users into a decentralized ecosystem where moderation is difficult or non-existent, effectively creating an unpoliceable propaganda hub. The actual content does not match this pattern; it presents a transparent, if idealistic, attempt to replicate a specific historical user experience.
Bridge Questions:
1. Can a platform survive by intentionally removing the "addictive" features that its competitors use to ensure growth?
2. Does the requirement for live-recording truly verify "human" origin, or does it simply limit the tools available for creative expression?
3. Will users prioritize the ability to migrate their data over the convenience of centralized, high-performance algorithms?
