The Commercial Space Race

A strong commercial space industry is an important partner for the U.S. government, as it contributes to building more robust space and defense capabilities and facilitates innovation more broadly. As competition between the United States and China heats up, both countries look to the commercial space sector to help them get ahead in both the space race and defense technologies. We asked five experts: What is a crucial step for the United States to take now to stay ahead in commercial space competition with China?Read more below.Rebekah ReedAssociate Director in the Belfer Center’s Program on Emerging Technology, Scientific Advancement, and Global Policy at the Harvard Kennedy SchoolThe road to deep space and sustained lunar operations depends on a capability we don’t have yet: cryogenic propellant transfer. China is already ahead of us on one piece of this: in 2025, it became the first nation to successfully demonstrate satellite-to-satellite hydrazine refueling in geostationary orbit. The Pentagon is funding multiple vendors through anchor-tenant contracts to build competing in-space refueling capabilities for national security satellites. The United States should apply that same model to cryogenic propellant transfer: NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services and Commercial Resupply Services programs filled the post-shuttle cargo gap, and the Commercial Lunar Payload Services project jumpstarted commercial lunar landing services. Extending this approach to deep-space fuel depot infrastructure would convert America’s heavy-lift lead into lasting operational dominance before China closes the gap. Roads need gas stations. Let’s make sure they are American.Kari A. BingenDirector of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International StudiesU.S. space companies are the world’s benchmark, but that lead is not guaranteed. China’s commercial space sector is expanding with extraordinary speed and ambition. Chinese launch startups, broadband internet companies, and satellite imagery firms are positioning themselves to capture more global market share by offering services from large satellite constellations and reusable rockets,
Members-Only Content
This article is reserved for War on the Rocks members. Join our community to unlock exclusive insights and analysis.
A strong commercial space industry is an important partner for the U.S. government, as it contributes to building more robust space and defense capabilities and facilitates innovation more broadly. As competition between the United States and China heats up, both countries look to the commercial space sector to help them get ahead in both the space race and defense technologies. We asked five experts: What is a crucial step for the United States to take now to stay ahead in commercial space competition with China?Read more below.Rebekah ReedAssociate Director in the Belfer Center’s Program on Emerging Technology, Scientific Advancement, and

Facts Only

* The commercial space industry contributes to building robust space and defense capabilities and facilitates innovation.
* Competition between the United States and China involves both space race and defense technologies.
* China demonstrated satellite-to-satellite hydrazine refueling in geostationary orbit in 2025.
* The Pentagon funds multiple vendors through anchor-tenant contracts to build competing in-space refueling capabilities for national security satellites.
* NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services and Commercial Resupply Services programs filled the post-shuttle cargo gap.
* The Commercial Lunar Payload Services project jumpstarted commercial lunar landing services.
* Extending this approach to deep-space fuel depot infrastructure would convert heavy-lift lead into operational dominance.

Executive Summary

The commercial space industry is presented as a vital partner for the U.S. government because it enhances space and defense capabilities and fosters broader innovation. The growing competition between the United States and China has drawn both nations to the commercial space sector as a means to advance in the space race and defense technologies. Experts suggest that developing cryogenic propellant transfer capability is crucial for deep space and lunar operations, noting that China has already achieved satellite-to-satellite hydrazine refueling demonstration in geostationary orbit by 2025. To counter this, experts propose extending existing government approaches used for funding commercial space infrastructure, such as the NASA Commercial Orbital Transportation Services and Commercial Resupply Services programs, and the Commercial Lunar Payload Services project, to deep-space fuel depot infrastructure. This extension aims to leverage the U.S. heavy-lift advantage into operational dominance by establishing necessary refueling capabilities. Furthermore, the existing lead held by U.S. space companies is not guaranteed, as the Chinese commercial sector is expanding rapidly through launch startups, internet companies, and satellite imagery firms seeking global market share.

Full Take

The narrative establishes a clear linkage between commercial space capabilities and geopolitical advantage, framing the competition not just as an exploration of technology but as a struggle for physical operational dominance through access to critical infrastructure, specifically propellant transfer. The suggestion that the U.S. must apply its successful commercial contracting model to deep-space refueling moves beyond simple technological parity toward asserting long-term strategic control over access points. The implication is that the current advantage stems from established heavy-lift capacity and foundational infrastructure investments (like the NASA programs), which can be leveraged into proprietary operational superiority if extended into novel domains like deep space logistics. This forces a critical examination of whether current defense and space spending prioritizes building operational reach or merely incremental technological superiority. The structure relies on creating an urgent need for action—establishing "American" refueling stations—to solidify a perceived gap that exists between current commercial leadership and potential future dominance, leveraging fear of being overtaken in the strategic race.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text presents an argument framed around US-China competition in space technology, utilizing expert commentary to propose specific infrastructure solutions, suggesting human policy analysis rather than pure synthetic generation.

Signals Detected

Sentence length variance is moderate; the flow transitions from broad context to specific technical claims.

The argument flows logically from a general premise (commercial space importance) to a specific technical recommendation (cryogenic propellant transfer infrastructure).

Uses named experts and references existing programs (NASA, commercial services) as anchors for the argument, suggesting engagement with real policy structures.

The core claims regarding China's hydrazine refueling achievement and the US strategic response are presented as direct policy recommendations grounded in perceived technological gaps.

Human Indicators

Use of specific, named expert titles (Rebekah Reed, Kari A. Bingen) implies sourcing from established policy/academic bodies.

The structure mimics a journalistic inquiry format ('We asked five experts: What is a crucial step...') followed by expert commentary, typical of commissioned analysis.