DARPA program aims to create a 30-year battery minimally viable prototype by early 2027.
How many missions could a drone or satellite fly with a battery pack that can last decades? And what if that battery could be fueled by nuclear waste?
That’s the future scientists are working toward in DARPA’s “Rads to Watts” program, which aims to create lightweight batteries with a high energy density. And a recent $3.37 million contract award aims to fund a viable proof-of-concept device that can produce more than 10 watts per kilogram with a yearslong shelf life.
“Solar cells directly convert sunlight into electricity…Ours directly convert radiation into electricity,” said Stafford Sheehan, CEO and founder of Project Omega, which describes their radioisotope power sources as mini-generators that replace traditional batteries.
“We already have some of these small devices running; the ones that are specifically designed to meet the DARPA figure of merit are going to come out early next year.”
Several organizations are participating in the program, with Morgan State University serving as the prime contractor and handling basic research and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory handling nuclear materials and testing. Northrop Grumman and ARA will bring computational modeling to make sure the prototype meets performance standards.
Project Omega will build the nuclear power generator based on a radioisotope found in nuclear waste, and Widetronix is designing the semiconductor power converter. The goal is to produce a working prototype by early 2027 at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
The power cells could be used in “any application where a battery dying is a pain point,” Sheehan said. “One example is on satellites: if you lose power on a satellite, you lose the satellite, it's gone…if your batteries die and you don't have any sort of backup power.”
These power sources use isotopes separated from nuclear waste and convert radiation directly into electricity.
“At a high level, we take nuclear waste, we recycle it into two products: one is fuel for reactors…the other are power isotopes, so isotopes you can use to power things,” Sheehan said.
Radioisotope power sources have been used in everything from smoke detectors to space systems. But Project Omega hopes to do it on a larger scale.
“There are over 100,000 metric tons of nuclear waste sitting in the 52 reactor sites around the country; so there's plenty of nuclear waste currently. The federal government gets sued for billions of dollars every year just because they haven't dealt with the nuclear waste,” Sheehan said. “It's very valuable to have a battery that lasts.”
Omega’s power cells consist of a solid state, or “chunk,” of isotope that will be layered with the semiconductor to generate power. They also work in extreme temperatures—something that would benefit military operations using unmanned systems in harsh environments.
“We have been using these radioisotope power systems in space for decades,” Sheehan said. “We're just taking the systems that we use for space and we're using a different isotope,” Strontinum-90, which is less hazardous than the Plutonium-238 isotopes used in similar systems.
The award comes as the Pentagon grapples with increased demand and use of drone systems
that have to be charged and the persistent need for more power generation on the battlefield.
“Over the next 18 months, the program will focus on reducing technical risk, testing system performance under realistic conditions, and generating the data needed to inform future development and transition pathways,” a PNNL official wrote in a statement to Defense One. “Key challenges include improving energy conversion efficiency, validating long-term reliability, managing radiation effects, and ensuring safe, secure handling and deployment.”
Facts Only
* DARPA program aims to create a 30-year battery minimally viable prototype by early 2027.
* A contract award targets a proof-of-concept device producing more than 10 watts per kilogram with a yearslong shelf life.
* Project Omega describes radioisotope power sources as mini-generators replacing traditional batteries.
* Power sources convert radiation directly into electricity by using isotopes separated from nuclear waste.
* Omega’s power cells consist of a solid state isotope layered with a semiconductor to generate power.
* The power cells operate in extreme temperatures.
* Radioisotope power sources have been used in smoke detectors and space systems.
* Project Omega intends to use Strontium-90 isotopes instead of Plutonium-238 for radioisotope power systems.
* The program focuses on reducing technical risk, testing performance under realistic conditions, and managing radiation effects over the next 18 months.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The framing positions a potential energy solution derived from existing waste streams—nuclear isotopes—as a direct response to pressing defense needs for long-duration power in unmanned systems. The narrative pivots on reframing a legacy liability (nuclear waste) into a critical resource, simultaneously addressing military and infrastructure energy demands. The emphasis on reducing the "pain point" of battery failure suggests an underlying anxiety about systemic vulnerability; if batteries die, operational continuity is lost.
The deployment of radioisotope power sources introduces complexities related to safety, handling, and proliferation—issues explicitly mentioned by the PNNL official regarding managing radiation effects and secure deployment. The contrast between using existing space technology systems and adapting them with alternative isotopes (Strontium-90) highlights a pattern of seeking incremental technological shifts rather than fundamental paradigm breaks when applied to high-stakes applications. The underlying assumption is that solving the power density problem inherently solves major security and logistical friction points, yet the necessary safety and regulatory hurdles—radiation management and secure handling—are positioned as secondary challenges within the development timeline.
What constraints govern the perceived value of this technology versus established, albeit less energy-dense, solutions? Who bears the risk associated with the transition from managing waste to deploying novel power sources in operational environments? If the primary motivation is mitigating drone/satellite loss, does this approach inadvertently shift risk from kinetic engagement to long-term radiological stewardship? What independent validation exists for the projected longevity and safety profiles of these systems under real-world stress?
Sentinel — Human
The text reads like a factual news report synthesizing specific research program details, involving named organizations and quoted experts, suggesting a human editorial source.
