'ZDNET Recommends': What exactly does it mean?
ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.
When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers.
ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form.
Dealing with silent robocalls? This is why scam callers keep quiet
Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET's key takeaways
- There's a reason scam callers don't respond when you answer.
- The goal is simply to confirm that your number is active and spammable.
- To deal with a call, hang up and use spam filtering to block them.
Have you ever picked up your phone to answer a call from an unknown number, only for no one to reply? That "hello?" you're shouting into the silent void could be feeding a machine. When you pick up a mystery call and hear nothing but dead air for three seconds, you aren't waiting for a confused human. You're actually waiting for automated dialer to hand you off to a live predator.
Also: This new phone scam has 'carriers' calling to exchange your device - don't fall for it
Yes, there is a method behind the madness. Just knowing that someone answered the call is validation that the phone is owned by a real person and that the number is active. That marks the intended victim and number as available for future scams.
'Automated reconnaissance'
"Calls where no one responds are rarely accidental," Shane Barney, chief information security officer at cybersecurity provider Keeper Security, told ZDNET. "In many cases, they are automated reconnaissance events. Fraud operations run at industrial scale, and before they invest human effort in a target, they validate that a number is active and answered by a real person."
What do scammers then do with your number?
"In modern fraud ecosystems, verified contact data has value," Barney said. "It is bought, sold, and reused. A silent call can serve as a filtering mechanism, separating dormant numbers from reachable individuals. It is less about the conversation and more about confirming that there is someone on the other end."
Also: This simple ChatGPT trick helps you spot scams before you click or respond
In some cases, your confirmed number may lead to phishing calls or emails. In other instances, you might be the target of a more serious type of attack.
"Once that validation occurs, it strengthens the attacker's ability to execute more convincing follow-on attacks," Barney said. "A confirmed number can be paired with a breached email address, used to trigger password reset flows, or targeted for SIM swap fraud."
These types of scams are nothing new, though they were more prevalent years ago, Barney explained. They seemed to go out of style as email and SMS phishing attacks became more common. Seeing them resurface highlights an important aspect of cybercrime. Attackers will reuse tactics and techniques that work.
What about calls in which the person responds after a short delay? That speaks to the automated operations run by spammers and scammers.
Also: I'm a tech pro and an AI job scam almost fooled me - here's what gave it away
"That pause is typically a function of predictive dialing infrastructure," Barney said. "These systems place high volumes of calls simultaneously and use algorithms to detect when a human answers. Once a voice is detected, the system routes the call to a live operator. The delay reflects the handoff process. From an operational standpoint, this model allows scammers to maximize efficiency while minimizing labor costs."
Is voice cloning a threat?
On the flip side, are you exposing yourself to any risks if you speak with the scammer, even just a few words? Voice cloning has always been a concern, especially with the advancements in AI. Could a scammer clone your voice and then use it to authorize purchases or run scams on your family and friends?
"Voice cloning is a real and evolving threat, but it's important not to let it drift into science fiction," Barney said. "Producing a convincing replica of someone's voice typically requires a clear and sustained audio sample, not just a quick 'hello.' A brief exchange is unlikely to give an attacker everything they need."
Also: AI threats will get worse: 6 ways to match the tenacity of your digital adversaries
Rather, risk comes into play when a cloned voice is used as part of a broader scam, Barney explained. If a scammer already has some of your personal details from public sources or data breaches, that cloned voice can add some credibility to the scam. That's why you want to limit what you say to a scammer.
What to do next
With all this in mind, how should you handle these types of calls? Here are three tips.
Hang up. If it's an unknown number and no one responds to your greeting, just hang up. The only downside here is that some calls with that initial silence may be legitimate, perhaps from an office, business, or known company. In that case, they will call back and can let the call go to voicemail. If it's important, the person will leave a message.
Don't respond, but stay on the line. Another strategy is to pick up a call from an unknown or suspicious number, but don't say hello or anything else. If you hear nothing but silence, then just wait to see if the call disconnects. If the spammer or scammer doesn't detect a voice on the other end, they may then consider your number inactive and remove it from their call list.
Also: iPhone full of unknown texts? 4 ways to filter them out in iOS 26
Use spam call filtering. iPhones and Android phones do have built-in ways to block and identify spam calls. But a spam filtering app or service provides more granular control. In the US, the three major carriers -- Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile -- offer their own tools for dealing with spam calls. You'll also find a variety of third-party spam filtering apps. Some apps to consider are RoboKiller, Truecaller, and Hiya.
But will these call filtering apps block you from all spammers and scammers?
The reality of call filtering
"Call filtering applications can significantly reduce the volume of nuisance calls, particularly those tied to large-scale spam campaigns," Barney said. "They are especially good at identifying numbers that have already been reported and flagged by others, however, they are not perfect. Fraud infrastructure changes quickly, and new numbers appear constantly. A highly targeted call can still get through. These tools are helpful in managing volume, but they are not a substitute for sound security practices."
To do their job, these apps also collect certain data from you, most notably your contact lists. Such information reveals who you speak with and how often. That's why you should review the security and privacy permissions of each app to learn what data is collected and how it's handled.
"There is a tradeoff," Barney said. "Reducing spam exposure has clear benefits, but any application with deep visibility into your communications should be chosen deliberately. Filtering tools can reduce noise. Protecting accounts with strong authentication and unique credentials is what limits real damage if something slips through."
Facts Only
Silent robocalls are used to confirm active phone numbers for scamming purposes.
Automated dialers detect human voices and route calls to live operators after a delay.
Verified phone numbers are bought, sold, and reused in fraud ecosystems.
Confirmed numbers may lead to phishing, SIM swap fraud, or password reset attacks.
Voice cloning requires sustained audio samples, making brief interactions low-risk.
Spam filtering apps can reduce nuisance calls but may not block all targeted scams.
Major U.S. carriers and third-party apps offer tools to filter spam calls.
Silent calls may originate from legitimate businesses but will typically leave voicemails if important.
Cybersecurity experts recommend hanging up or remaining silent to avoid validation.
Fraud operations reuse tactics that have proven effective in the past.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative highlights a well-documented and evolving threat: silent robocalls as a reconnaissance tool for fraud. The analysis credibly explains the mechanics of automated dialing systems, the value of verified contact data in fraud ecosystems, and practical mitigation strategies. It avoids sensationalism by clarifying the limited risk of voice cloning from brief interactions and acknowledges the limitations of spam filtering tools.
Pattern scan: The piece avoids emotional exploitation or distortion, focusing on factual explanations of scammer tactics. It does not engage in fear-mongering or false binaries, instead offering actionable advice. The only potential framing issue is the implicit assumption that all silent calls are malicious, which could overlook legitimate cases (e.g., telemarketers with delays). However, this is a minor oversight in an otherwise balanced presentation.
Root cause: The paradigm here is the industrialization of fraud, where scammers optimize for efficiency by automating reconnaissance. The unstated assumption is that individuals bear primary responsibility for protection, which may underplay systemic failures in telecom security or regulatory enforcement.
Implications: Human agency is preserved through education and tool adoption, but the burden of vigilance falls on users. Second-order consequences include normalized distrust of unknown calls, potential over-reliance on filtering apps (with their own privacy trade-offs), and the perpetual arms race between scammers and defenders.
Bridge questions: How might telecom providers better authenticate calls at the network level? What role should regulation play in curbing automated reconnaissance? Could AI-driven voice cloning eventually lower the barrier for convincing scams, even with brief samples?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign might exaggerate the threat of voice cloning to sell security products or justify surveillance. However, this article does not align with that pattern—it downplays the immediate risk of cloning and focuses on verifiable tactics. No structural alignment with manipulation detected.
Patterns detected: none
Sentinel — Human
The article appears to be written by a human journalist, as it exhibits signs of natural sentence structure, a clear editorial voice, and lacks overly formulaic argumentative structure common in synthetic content.