Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5548 out of 100, reading level.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
China is pledging to use ‘extraordinary measures’ to support the country's bid to become a global leader in artificial intelligence, quantum technology and other cutting-edge technological fields, according to its 15th five-year plan.
The plan (FYP) was passed by the top legislature in Beijing on Thursday and published on Friday. It will run from 2026 to 2030 and serves as China’s overarching blueprint.
Many researchers noted an air of confidence in the plan. “Five years ago, the sentiment of the Chinese science policymakers was still very much like, we don’t want to be too far behind the US, we are still doing the catching up,” says Meicen Sun, an information scientist at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. “Now, there is this more palpable sentiment that there’s a real chance we can be a true leader,” she says.
The government has promised to boost its research and development (R&D) expenditure over the next five years. And the country’s science budget is also expected to increase to 426 billion yuan (US$62 billion) this year, a rise of 10% from 2025.
The Chinese government now considers science to be as important as other top-level national goals, such as boosting defence, economic growth and the country’s international influence, says Stefanie Kam, who researches Chinese politics at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.
Technology strangleholds
The plan also doubles down on the government’s long-term goal of becoming more self-sufficient by overcoming technological bottlenecks that prevent China from making key technologies, such as advanced semiconductor chips.
It calls for breakthroughs along the ‘whole chain of development’ in six domains: integrated circuits, industrial machine tools (machines that make other machines), high-end instruments, basic software, advanced materials and biomanufacturing.
That essentially means that the country will step up its domestic capabilities in every aspect of those industries, says Steven Hai, a political economist focusing on technology innovation at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University in Suzhou, China.
Although China has tried to overcome technological choke points for many years, the mission has been brought to the fore in the 15th FYP, mainly owing to China–US competition for technological supremacy, says Zhou Weihuan, a legal scholar specializing in China at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.
The plan doesn’t go into detail about what the extraordinary measures will entail, but Sun suggests they will include provisions such as the ‘K visa’, which was rolled out last year to attract foreign scientists. “Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures. This document is a prime embodiment of this,” she says.
The country will also fast-track R&D in areas such as biotechnology, neuroscience and deep-space exploration.
AI strategy
The plan doubles down on the use of artificial intelligence, applying the technology across society, in fields ranging from industrial development to social governance, as part of a national campaign called AI plus, which was announced last year.
AI research is now being treated as a crucial and strategic national resource that requires security along the whole supply chain, including chips, basic software and training to ensure mass adoption, Kam says.
In early 2025, Chinese tech start-up firm DeepSeek shocked the world by releasing two large language models (LLMs) that rivalled the performance of the dominant tools developed by US tech giants — but that were built at a fraction of the cost and computing power needed to train their US counterparts.
Sun says that the country’s AI advances have served as a confidence booster for its “attitudinal change” as to its standing in the global technological race. She expects China to not only develop AI as a technology, but also to “actively and pre-emptively” write the global rule books on AI governance and regulation.
Public and private
Enjoying our latest content?
Log in or create an account to continue
Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research

Facts Only

* China is developing the 15th Five-Year Plan.
* The plan runs from 2026 to 2030.
* China is aiming for global leadership in AI, quantum technology, and cutting-edge tech.
* R&D expenditure is set to increase to 426 billion yuan (US$62 billion).
* The science budget will rise by 10% to 426 billion yuan.
* The plan was passed by the top legislature in Beijing.
* Five-year ago, Chinese science policymakers were cautious.
* Now, there's a "more palpable sentiment" of a chance to lead.
* The government considers science as important as defense, economic growth, and international influence.
* The plan doubles down on becoming self-sufficient.
* It calls for breakthroughs in six domains: integrated circuits, industrial machine tools, high-end instruments, basic software, advanced materials, and biomanufacturing.
* The country will step up domestic capabilities in every aspect of those industries.
* The plan is driven by competition with the US for technological supremacy.
* The ‘K visa’ was rolled out last year to attract foreign scientists.
* The country will fast-track R&D in biotechnology, neuroscience, and deep-space exploration.
* AI research is being treated as a crucial national resource.

Executive Summary

China is undertaking a significant strategic shift in its technological development, aiming for global leadership in AI, quantum technology, and related fields. This ambition is formalized in the 15th Five-Year Plan, set to run from 2026 to 2030, and represents a departure from a previously cautious approach. The government’s commitment is underscored by a planned increase in R&D expenditure to 426 billion yuan ($62 billion), a 10% rise from the previous year. The plan emphasizes self-sufficiency, particularly in overcoming technological bottlenecks like semiconductor shortages. Key areas of focus include integrated circuits, industrial machine tools, high-end instruments, basic software, advanced materials, and biomanufacturing. The government views technological advancement as on par with defense, economic growth, and international influence. Notably, the plan incorporates measures like the “K visa” program to attract foreign scientists and prioritizes AI development across various sectors, viewing it as a strategic national resource. This represents a concerted effort to reduce reliance on foreign technologies and establish dominance in key technological areas.

Full Take

The 15th Five-Year Plan reveals a fundamental shift in China’s geopolitical ambitions, moving beyond a reactive “catching up” strategy to an assertive push for global technological dominance. The scale of the investment – 426 billion yuan – immediately signals a substantial commitment, framed not merely as an economic initiative but as a strategic imperative directly contesting US hegemony in emerging technologies. The emphasis on a “whole chain of development” across six key domains, from semiconductors to biomanufacturing, represents an attempt to create a fully integrated and self-reliant technological ecosystem, tackling the critical bottleneck of reliance on foreign supply chains. The inclusion of the “K visa” and prioritizing AI research, coupled with the “AI plus” campaign, are tactical maneuvers designed to attract top talent and rapidly deploy AI across society – a deliberate move to both drive innovation and shape the future governance of this technology. Sun's observation that China is now “actively and pre-emptively” aiming to write the global rules on AI regulation reveals a profoundly ambitious and potentially destabilizing element: not simply developing AI, but controlling its development and deployment worldwide. This pattern aligns with a broader trend of China utilizing strategic investments – in infrastructure, technology, and soft power – as instruments of geopolitical influence. The inclusion of deep-space exploration alongside biotechnology and neuroscience suggests a pursuit of long-term, transformative capabilities, indicative of a nation seeking to establish itself as a dominant force across multiple technological frontiers. The entire strategy echoes classic “system shock” narratives – deliberate interventions designed to disrupt established power dynamics and reshape the global landscape. Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (regarding the specific “extraordinary measures”); ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (the plan states “extraordinary measures,” but provides no specifics, creating a layered argument); ARC-0017 Pattern Recognition (a predictable pattern of state-led technological advancement).

Sentinel — Likely Human

Confidence

This article presents a largely factual overview of China’s 15th Five-Year Plan focusing on technological advancement, exhibiting characteristics common in reportage but with a degree of stylistic homogenization that warrants further scrutiny for potential AI assistance.

Signals Detected
medium severity: Sentence length variance is moderate; frequent use of declarative sentences with varied lengths.
medium severity: The text presents a balanced view of Chinese ambitions, relying heavily on quotes and framing without deeply exploring potential contradictions or risks.
low severity: Frequent use of transitional phrases ('however,' 'moreover,' 'furthermore') creating a somewhat predictable argumentative structure, lacking a distinct voice or original analysis.
low severity: The reference to the 'K visa' and the DeepSeek LLM release without extensive detail or verification details introduces a potential element of information reliance.
Human Indicators
The use of multiple expert quotes, while common, leans toward a carefully constructed, possibly manufactured, consensus.
The reliance on descriptive language regarding the plan’s goals, rather than critical analysis of their feasibility or potential consequences.