Movies and the Attention Span

As young people struggle to sit through even an hour of a film, modern blockbusters are getting longer.
This is an edition of The Wonder Reader, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a set of stories to spark your curiosity and fill you with delight. Sign up here to get it every Saturday morning.
Earlier this year, my colleague Rose Horowitch reported on a new irony in higher education: Students who have chosen to take film classes can’t sit through the films. One professor told her that “his students remind him of nicotine addicts going through withdrawal during screenings: The longer they go without checking their phone, the more they fidget. Eventually, they give in.”
Meanwhile, as young people struggle to sit through even an hour of a movie, modern blockbusters are getting longer, many of them running three hours. Some of these movies manage to hold viewers’ attention with bombastic action scenes that command focus on a big screen. But how long is too long? Today’s newsletter explores what keeps many of us from immersing ourselves in longer works—and some alternatives for when you just can’t handle sitting still for three hours.
On Movies and Attention
The Film Students Who Can No Longer Sit Through Films
By Rose Horowitch
The attention-span crisis goes to the movies.
Six Acclaimed Movies With Short Runtimes
By Stephanie Bai
Bring back the 90-minute film. (From 2024)
The Attention-Span Class Divide
By Xochitl Gonzalez
Who can afford to sit still at the movies?
Still Curious?
- The elite college students who can’t read books: To read a book in college, it helps to have read a book in high school, Rose wrote in 2024.
- 20 perfect TV shows for short attention spans: For both quick laughs and thoughtful reflections, try one of these highly bingeable half-hour comedies, Shirley Li wrote in 2022.
Other Diversions
PS
I recently asked readers to share a photo of something that sparks their sense of awe in the world. Charlotte M., 80, sent this photo of Hanalei Bay, Kauai.
I’ll continue to feature your responses in the coming weeks.
— Isabel

Facts Only

* Young people struggle to sit through an hour of film.
* Modern blockbusters are getting longer, some running three hours.
* A professor observed that students taking film classes fidgeted during screenings, mirroring nicotine withdrawal.
* Six acclaimed movies with short runtimes are recommended.
* Two perfect TV shows for short attention spans are suggested.
* The text references a quote from Rose Horowitch regarding students and screenings.

Executive Summary

Modern blockbusters are increasing in length, with some running three hours, leading to a perceived struggle for young people to maintain attention spans during film screenings. This phenomenon is highlighted by an anecdote from a professor noting that students in film classes exhibit fidgeting during screenings, similar to nicotine withdrawal. The text then suggests alternatives for managing short attention spans, including recommending shorter films and specific TV show suggestions designed for quick engagement. Furthermore, the piece contrasts this issue with the perceived ability of elite college students to manage reading time versus movie viewing time, suggesting a divide in sustained focus.

Full Take

The narrative links an observed contemporary struggle—shortened attention spans—to a structural change in media consumption (longer films). The core implication lies in the tension between passive consumption, which demands sustained focus, and the fragmented nature of modern engagement. The suggestion to shorten movies or pivot to shorter content reflects a demand for efficiency in experience delivery. The contrast drawn between college students' reading habits and movie-watching habits hints at how attention is distributed across different modes of learning and leisure. The underlying pattern suggests that when media resists brief attention, the proposed solutions emphasize brevity as a necessary corrective measure, potentially framing longer media not just as an inconvenience but as an obstacle to cognitive endurance. The question remains whether this focus on runtime modification addresses the deeper structural reasons for diminished sustained engagement, or simply manages the symptom.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

This text reads like curated editorial content blending personal reflection with references to external sources, suggesting human curation of information rather than pure machine generation.

Signals Detected

Moderate sentence length variance; personal narrative framing with clear transitions.

Clear thematic thread linking film attention, education, and media consumption, supported by specific anecdotes.

Structure mimics a newsletter/editorial format with internal links and attributed segments (Rose Horowitch), suggesting human editorial direction.

References to specific reports, named authors (Stephanie Bai, Shirley Li), and dated recommendations suggest a compilation of existing content rather than pure fabrication.

Human Indicators

The text exhibits a narrative flow typical of an editorial or newsletter piece, employing personal framing ('my colleague,' 'I recently asked readers') which resists the flat tone often seen in unconstrained LLM output.

The integration of specific, cited recommendations (e.g., Shirley Li's TV shows from 2022) suggests referencing real-world content rather than generating entirely novel, unconnected facts.