Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Andrew Macintosh is a professor of environmental law and policy at the Centre for Environmental Markets, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
It is a dark time for climate policy and global affairs. Wars in Ukraine, the Gaza Strip and now Iran, as well as the domestic and international policy and trade agendas of US President Donald Trump’s administration, are diverting attention from efforts to cut greenhouse-gas emissions. Momentum for mitigating climate change is now in retreat, as it was after the 2008 global financial crisis.
Economist Nicholas Stern pushes against that tide in his latest book. The Growth Story of the 21st Century is drawn from lectures at the London School of Economics in 2024 and builds on his earlier works in an attempt to reinvigorate worldwide efforts to limit global warming.
Stern’s 2006 report for the UK government, The Economics of Climate Change, is arguably the most influential work on that topic, both because of its content and the fierce debate that it prompted. The report, and his 2016 book Why Are We Waiting?, pushed the case for immediate and aggressive efforts to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, based mostly on the argument that it is cheaper to decarbonize than it is to deal with the potentially catastrophic costs of climate change.
The Growth Story reiterates that point. It also repeats Stern’s critiques of the mainstream economics community, which he argues has oversimplified climate change, downplayed its risks and misleadingly portrayed climate action as being incompatible with economic growth. But the book’s main contribution and focus is on how a new ‘clean’ economy, constructed around sustainability and cooperation, can provide a more efficient, prosperous and healthy society.
The case Stern makes for sustainable development is not new; others have made similar arguments in the past. What sets the book apart is its breadth, accessibility and the practical prescriptions for reform. Rather than hiding behind abstraction, The Growth Story provides a well-defined vision of what sustainable development might look like and how it might be achieved.
Promise of a clean economy
Stern’s vision is laid out in four parts. Part one lays the foundations by introducing sustainable development and Stern’s preferred definition of it: maintenance of physical, human, natural and social capital so that future generations have opportunities that are at least as good as the current generation has. It then describes the existing international climate-policy frameworks and how they have evolved, the basics of climate science and the case for urgent decarbonization.
From there, Stern turns to the history and geography of greenhouse-gas emissions and the ethics and economics of mitigation, before focusing on the factors that provide an opportunity to accelerate climate action. These include rising public concern and youth activism, declining costs of clean energy, the rise of artificial intelligence and increases in innovation and investment.
Part two describes key drivers of growth in the new economy: rapid innovation, increasing investment and returns on clean technologies, more efficient use of resources, stronger productivity (including in transport and energy systems) and improved health. Because of these drivers, Stern argues, rapid decarbonization does not need to involve economic sacrifice. It can usher in more prosperous, vibrant and efficient economies.
To realize this promise, Stern sets out the actions needed to shift the global economy onto this sustainable path and the role of the state in fostering and directing these reforms. Outlined priorities for investment include accelerating the energy transition, helping communities to adapt to and become more resilient to climate-change effects, and preserving and restoring nature. He also discusses the importance of ensuring a ‘just transition’, in which the immediate losers from structural change are looked after.
Stern places low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), excluding China, at the centre of his narrative, because they will probably be the fastest-growing economies for the rest of this century. LMICs should play a more prominent part in leading the transition, he argues, because their development path over the coming decades will dictate global climate outcomes.
Part four of the book is devoted to debunking counterarguments and fallacies, and pushing the case for his optimistic vision of the future. “Yes, we can” is the takeaway message.
Enjoying our latest content?
Log in or create an account to continue
Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research
Facts Only
Andrew Macintosh is a professor of environmental law and policy at the Australian National University.
Nicholas Stern is an economist who authored *The Economics of Climate Change* (2006) and *Why Are We Waiting?* (2016).
Stern’s new book, *The Growth Story of the 21st Century*, is based on lectures from the London School of Economics in 2024.
The book argues that decarbonization is cheaper than addressing climate change impacts.
Stern critiques mainstream economics for oversimplifying climate change and portraying climate action as incompatible with growth.
The book proposes a "clean" economy centered on sustainability and cooperation.
Stern defines sustainable development as maintaining physical, human, natural, and social capital for future generations.
Key drivers of growth in the new economy include innovation, clean technology investment, resource efficiency, and productivity gains.
The book emphasizes the role of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in leading the climate transition.
Stern advocates for a "just transition" to support communities affected by structural economic changes.
The book debunks counterarguments and promotes an optimistic vision of sustainable development.
Global conflicts and political shifts, such as the Trump administration’s policies, have reduced momentum for climate action.
Executive Summary
Nicholas Stern, a prominent economist, has released a new book titled *The Growth Story of the 21st Century*, which builds on his earlier works, including the influential 2006 *Stern Review* on climate economics. The book argues that decarbonization is economically advantageous and that sustainable development can drive prosperity without sacrificing growth. Stern critiques mainstream economics for downplaying climate risks and frames climate action as compatible with economic progress. He emphasizes the role of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in leading the transition, given their projected economic growth and influence on global emissions. The book outlines practical steps for accelerating the energy transition, adapting to climate impacts, and ensuring a just transition for affected communities. Stern’s vision is optimistic, asserting that rapid innovation, declining clean energy costs, and increased investment can create a more efficient and prosperous economy.
The context includes ongoing global conflicts and political shifts, such as the Trump administration’s policies, which have diverted attention from climate action. Stern’s work seeks to counter this momentum loss by presenting a clear, actionable path forward. While his arguments are not entirely new, the book stands out for its accessibility and concrete prescriptions. It also addresses counterarguments, reinforcing the feasibility of his proposed clean economy. The narrative centers on the idea that sustainable development is not only necessary but also economically beneficial, particularly for LMICs, which will shape future climate outcomes.
Full Take
**STEELMAN:** Stern’s narrative is compelling in its integration of economic logic with climate urgency. By framing decarbonization as an economic opportunity rather than a sacrifice, he bridges the gap between environmentalism and growth-oriented policymaking. His emphasis on LMICs as leaders in the transition is strategically sound, given their demographic and economic trajectories. The book’s practical prescriptions—such as accelerating clean energy adoption and ensuring a just transition—provide actionable steps that policymakers and businesses can rally around. Stern’s critique of mainstream economics also highlights a legitimate blind spot in traditional models, which often underestimate systemic risks like climate change.
**PATTERN SCAN:** The narrative employs a classic *ARC-0012 Hope-Based Framing*, where the focus on optimism and feasibility ("Yes, we can") may downplay the political and structural barriers to implementation. While Stern acknowledges counterarguments, the book’s tone leans toward *ARC-0024 Ambiguity* in glossing over the complexities of global coordination, particularly in LMICs with competing development priorities. There’s no overt manipulation, but the framing risks *ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey*—where the "motte" (safe, uncontroversial claim: "sustainability is good") shields the "bailey" (contentious claim: "LMICs can lead without trade-offs").
**ROOT CAUSE:** The paradigm here is *technocratic optimism*—the belief that innovation and policy reforms can outpace systemic inertia. This echoes post-WWII development economics, where growth was seen as the cure for all ills. The unstated assumption is that political will and capital flows will align with Stern’s vision, despite historical evidence of misaligned incentives (e.g., fossil fuel subsidies, short-term electoral cycles).
**IMPLICATIONS:** For human agency, Stern’s framework empowers policymakers and investors by offering a roadmap, but it may underestimate the agency of incumbent industries resistant to change. LMICs stand to benefit from green growth, but the costs—such as stranded assets or social disruption—could fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations. Second-order consequences include potential greenwashing (where "sustainable" labels mask unsustainable practices) and geopolitical tensions over resource access (e.g., rare earth minerals for clean tech).
**BRIDGE QUESTIONS:**
1. If LMICs are to lead the transition, what mechanisms ensure that wealthier nations don’t offload their own decarbonization burdens onto them?
2. How does Stern’s model account for the political economy of fossil fuel dependence in both high-income and developing nations?
3. What historical precedents exist for a "just transition" at scale, and what lessons do they offer?
**COUNTERSTRIKE SCAN:** A bad actor pushing this narrative might exaggerate the ease of transition, omit the role of vested interests, or frame dissent as "anti-progress." Stern’s book avoids these pitfalls by acknowledging challenges and counterarguments. The content aligns with genuine advocacy rather than coordinated manipulation.
Sentinel — Human
It is likely that this text was written by a human journalist rather than an AI. The article shows signs of human inconsistency in sentence length variation and the presence of idiosyncratic emphasis and personal voice.