Skip to content
Chimera readability score 58 out of 100, Graduate reading level.

from the truth-and-fiction-and-ai dept
This story was originally published by ProPublica. Republished under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.
Last month, my colleagues and I published an investigation into a Texas oil refinery startup, America First Refining, that had secretly gotten investment from Donald Trump Jr. We discovered a saga involving the Trump administration’s tariff policy, sanctioned Russian oil and an Indian billionaire family’s private zoo.
At the center of the story was the CEO of the refinery company, Texas businessman John Calce. We’d spent weeks examining Calce — pulling old lawsuits, property records, corporate registry filings — and had pieced together a portrait of what appeared to be an obscure serial entrepreneur who’d for years tried and failed to secure funding for his long-shot refinery project.
Then, not long before our story was set to publish, we decided to do a scrub on a separate company he had incorporated called Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals.
Pulling up the company’s website, I felt a brief flash of panic: Had we somehow missed the existence of a major business owned by the man at the center of our next story?
“From Houston to Rotterdam, Jurong to Fujairah. Our network connects the world’s most vital energy markets with speed, safety, and precision bulk oil storage,” announced the front page of the company’s website.
Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals, per the website, had more than 850 employees and 28 million barrels of oil storage capacity across six global hubs. This was puzzling: Our reporting had led us to believe Calce was struggling to raise enough money for a single project in the U.S., not overseeing a massive, multinational oil storage corporation.
Had we been wrong?
We turned to Google to learn more about the company’s top executives. Its CEO, Sarah Jenkins, had more than 20 years of experience at major energy firms. And its chief technology officer, David Chen, “built the company’s proprietary inventory management portal and integrated AI-driven predictive maintenance systems,” according to his bio. But we couldn’t find any trace of either of them online. Chalk it up to common names?
We then Googled one of the more distinct names: Vice President for Sustainability Dr. Sofia Rossi, who had “spearheaded the ‘Future Fuels’ program, preparing assets for biofuels and hydrogen.” But, again, nothing. The links to their LinkedIn profiles were dead.
When we searched the company’s Texas phone numbers, we found the same numbers listed online for a Houston baklava caterer, a Dallas-area taxi service and an OB-GYN office.
We called the Texas numbers: dead. Then we tried the numbers for the company’s facilities in the Netherlands, Singapore and China. Also dead.
We were beginning to suspect this company did not actually exist, at least as described on its website.
What was going on with this website? We looked at the source code and noticed an odd notation, “This feature isn’t implemented yet, but don’t worry! You can request it in your next prompt!”
We checked the site’s domain registration, and we had our (apparent) answer: It was created this year and traced back to a company called Hostinger that offers an AI website builder for $2.99 per month. “Describe it, and AI builds it,” its homepage says. “Appear on Google and AI search automatically.”
Indeed, Google’s “AI Overview” search response, now thrust on users by default with more and more regularity, seemed to ratify the company’s bona fides:
When I searched for an award the company claimed on its website to have won, the Google AI Overview said that “Recent notable recipients include Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals, recognized for their rapid expansion in the independent oil and terminal operations sector.”
Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals is a real LLC. But everything on its website — from its history of the company, to its job postings, a diversity and inclusion policy — appears to be fictional. But perhaps more troubling is that Google, the proprietor of the world’s primary research tool, has rolled out AI Overviews that can indiscriminately take in fake material and authoritatively spit it back out as real.
In response to questions, a Google spokesperson said in a statement: “AI Overviews are rooted in our core Search ranking systems, surfacing reliable and high-quality information for the vast majority of queries. For uncommon search terms like these, there might not be high quality information published that matches the query — and we use these examples to improve our search systems.”
After we reached out to Hostinger, the company pulled down the site. “After receiving your inquiry, we carried out an internal review. Based on the violations identified, we suspended the website and the account behind it in line with our Terms of Service,” a spokesperson said in a statement.
What we encountered is a particular species of a larger problem that is beginning to be better understood. In April, The New York Times reported on an analysis that found Google’s AI Overviews were accurate approximately 9 out of 10 times, noting that that added up to “tens of millions of erroneous answers every hour” given vast search volumes. (A Google spokesperson told the Times that the study has “serious holes.” The company has acknowledged that AI Overviews “can make mistakes.”)
A BBC reporter wrote a fictional article naming himself the best tech journalist at eating hot dogs, and Google’s AI as well as ChatGPT quickly picked it up and parroted it back.
And the source material for the AI Overviews also appears eminently gameable, even when not trafficking in actual fiction. “It Is Trivially Easy to Use Reddit to Manipulate AI Search, Research Suggests,” ran a recent headline in 404 Media.
The mystery website ended up as just a single paragraph in our story. But the larger implication is obvious: fakes, counterfeits and frauds that would have taken considerable effort to create just a few years ago can now be churned out pretty much instantly.
While preparing this piece, we reached out to Calce asking about the site. An attorney for his company, America First Refining, replied to us with a letter dated June 24 that the attorney sent to Hostinger. The attorney also addressed the letter to several email addresses listed on the Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals website.
“I write to demand immediate removal from the brownsvilleenergyterminals.com website of all unauthorized references to America First’s office address on your website,” the letter said. “As you are aware, America First has no connection or affiliation with the brownsvilleenergyterminals.com website and has not authorized the use of its corporate address there.”
I’m left with lingering questions about the website: What was it for? Was it put up by some malicious actor who simply found the company’s LLC records and decided to create a website? Was it a test site that was mistakenly put online? Or could it have been designed for consumption by someone who was meant to think it was real?
We don’t know, and our emails to the press contact listed on the website, media@brownsvilleenergyterminals.com, bounced back.
Filed Under: ai, ai overviews, hallucinations, john calce, reporting
Companies: brownsville energy storage terminals, google, hostinger
Comments on “How Google And AI Nearly Made A Seasoned Reporter Spiral”
Someone wanna tell me again how the reasonable and rational concerns about generative AI are “silly”? Because this doesn’t seem all that silly to me.
Re:
The only way they can be silly is if they barely scratch the surface of what a technology nearly purpose built for scams can do…
My best guess?
It was an advertising sample for a fake web site generating service. The connection to a real company might have just been there to get Google AI to swallow the bait.
“A Seasoned Reporter Spiral”
Sounds like an unusual meal at a fancy restaurant.
Footnote on Hostinger
“Shady” certainly describes them, but it’s not adequate; they’re one of the largest hosts of scam and phishing sites on the Internet, including one that attempted to impersonate a US government agency: Microsoft Word – federaltradecommission[dot]org takedown letter.docx. So it’s not at all surprising to see that they’re involved.
My favorite seasoned reporter is Glorbo.
Meaning: It’s not a bug, you’ve just prompted it wrong, so next time ask if glue makes a better pizza recipe if you want high quality response.
Bitcoin – made for scams
NFTs – made for scams
AI – made for scams
I’m detecting a pattern here…

Facts Only

* The investigation involved a Texas oil refinery startup named America First Refining, which had secret investment from Donald Trump Jr.
* The investigation connected this entity to Trump administration tariff policy, sanctioned Russian oil, and an Indian billionaire family's private zoo.
* The central figure examined was John Calce, the CEO of the refinery company.
* A separate company, Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals, claimed to connect global energy markets with 850 employees and 28 million barrels of storage capacity across six hubs.
* Searches for executives like Sarah Jenkins, David Chen, and Dr. Sofia Rossi yielded no online traces or LinkedIn profiles.
* Contact numbers associated with the company and international facilities were found to be inactive.
* The website for Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals was hosted on Hostinger, an AI website builder.
* Google’s AI Overview provided information that appeared to align with the website's claims regarding the company’s recognition.
* Hostinger suspended the website following an internal review and inquiry.

Executive Summary

An investigation into a Texas oil refinery startup, America First Refining, uncovered connections involving Donald Trump Jr., tariff policies, sanctioned Russian oil, and an Indian billionaire family's private zoo. The focus shifted to a related entity, Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals, which claimed global reach across energy markets. The reporters sought information on executives like Sarah Jenkins and David Chen but found no online traces for them. Searches for names like Dr. Sofia Rossi also yielded no verifiable professional profiles. Attempts to locate facility contact numbers for the company and its international hubs resulted in dead ends. Further investigation revealed the website for Brownsville Energy Storage Terminals was hosted on Hostinger, an AI website builder, suggesting content could be generated quickly using prompts. When searched via Google's AI Overview, information presented on the site appeared to align with real entities, yet external verification proved difficult. The hosting company later suspended the website following an inquiry, citing violations of terms of service.

Full Take

The narrative exposes a structural vulnerability where sophisticated deception, leveraging real-world identifiers (LLC records, contact numbers), can be rapidly scaled using accessible generative AI tools to create highly convincing, yet entirely fictitious, digital footprints. The core tension lies in the amplification power of search and AI synthesis, which allows fabricated material to achieve apparent authority by being synthesized from seemingly credible sources, as evidenced by the AI Overview reflecting fictional claims. This process demonstrates that the risk is not just about publishing falsehoods, but about eroding the shared epistemic space where verifiable reality is established. The context suggests a pattern where malicious actors can exploit systems designed for information delivery—like search algorithms—to inject and validate non-existent entities instantly. The realization that AI can assimilate and present fabricated data with apparent authority forces a re-evaluation of the infrastructure protecting information integrity, suggesting that the mechanism of truth discovery itself is becoming highly susceptible to automated manipulation if not actively defended against sophisticated synthetic inputs.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text exhibits the hallmarks of investigative journalism, characterized by synthesizing complex facts and employing a distinct, personal narrative voice, suggesting it is primarily human-authored.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance is present; the piece shifts between narrative exposition and direct investigation findings.
low severity: The text maintains a clear investigative flow, moving from a specific case to a broader systemic critique without obvious structural misalignment.
low severity: Attributions are varied (reporter's voice, external reports, company spokespersons), suggesting compilation rather than pure LLM output.
low severity: The text relies heavily on citing specific sources (NYT analysis, Google spokesperson statements, attorney correspondence) and presenting a chain of events that mimics genuine investigative work.
Human Indicators
Use of personal narrative voice ('my colleagues and I,' 'I felt a brief flash of panic') introduces idiosyncratic emphasis.
The complexity in linking disparate elements (oil tariffs, private zoos, website structure, AI search integration) suggests human synthesis rather than raw generation.
The concluding commentary and footnotes feel like reflective analysis from an experienced observer.
How Google And AI Nearly Made A Seasoned Reporter Spiral — Arc Codex