When people think about Wikimedia education work, they often think first about events: edit-a-thons, campaigns, classroom programs, contests, workshops, and training sessions. But over time, one lesson keeps becoming clearer: education work does not scale through activities alone. It scales through infrastructure.
That realization has become increasingly important for the EduWiki Hub as conversations continue around sustainability, coordination, visibility, and long-term support for Wikimedia education communities.
The Wikipedia & Education User Group is the Wikimedia Foundation’s only recognized global affiliate focused entirely on education-related Wikimedia initiatives. Its Theory of Change was designed around a central challenge: how do we help education communities grow sustainably while improving onboarding, coordination, and impact across the movement?
The answer has never been simply “run more programs.” The research behind the Theory of Change identified deeper structural needs: clearer coordination, stronger support systems, better knowledge sharing, and more reliable technical maintenance for the tools organizers depend on every day.
That last point matters more than it sometimes appears.
For many organizers, the Programs & Events (P&E) Dashboard is where Wikimedia education work becomes visible. It is where campaigns are tracked, participation is measured, contributions are documented, and impact becomes easier to explain. Without that infrastructure, much of the work happening across Wikimedia education communities becomes harder to organize, harder to compare, and harder to sustain.
Over time, I have increasingly come to see that infrastructure shapes participation.
When tools are difficult to navigate, campaigns become harder to coordinate. When reporting is limited, organizers struggle to explain outcomes. When discoverability is weak, valuable programs become harder to learn from and build upon. Small frictions in infrastructure often become large barriers for communities trying to grow educational initiatives.
That is one reason why the EduWiki Hub pilot treats technical infrastructure as a core service rather than an optional add-on.
During the 2025 Bogotá conversations around the EduWiki Hub model, participants repeatedly emphasized the importance of robust technical infrastructure alongside stronger coordination, resource sharing, and flexible support systems for programs of different sizes. The consultations made something increasingly clear: if education work is going to scale sustainably across Wikimedia spaces, the infrastructure supporting that work must evolve alongside the communities using it.
That thinking directly shaped the EduWiki Hub pilot structure, including the creation of a dedicated Technical Infrastructure pillar.
One of the clearest examples of this work is the ongoing improvement of the Programs & Events Dashboard.
Recently, community prioritization work around the Dashboard revealed a remarkably consistent set of concerns. Organizers and contributors repeatedly highlighted the need for better organization of campaigns and programs, more detailed participant-level statistics, improved Wikidata integration, contest support tools, and stronger search functionality.
What stood out to me was not simply which features ranked highest, but what those priorities collectively reveal.
They show that communities are asking for infrastructure that helps them think more clearly about participation, coordination, and impact.
The demand for improved search, for example, is not only about convenience. It reflects a broader need for discoverability and navigation across increasingly complex program ecosystems. The request for more detailed participant-level statistics is not just about data collection. It reflects a growing need for organizers to better understand engagement, measure outcomes, support evaluation, and communicate impact.
In other words, these requests are really about making Wikimedia education work easier to sustain.
That is why the recent Advanced Search improvements on the Dashboard matter.
On the surface, advanced search may seem like a relatively small feature update. But in practice, it changes how organizers interact with information. It helps users discover programs more easily, navigate Dashboard data more efficiently, and better understand the relationships between campaigns, organizers, editors, and contributions.
The broader lesson here is that infrastructure work is often invisible until communities feel its absence.
People notice broken workflows before they notice good architecture. They feel friction before they think about systems. But strong infrastructure quietly enables participation, coordination, learning, and growth.
That is especially true for Wikimedia education work, where organizers are often balancing community engagement, reporting, partnerships, teaching, and movement strategy all at once.
Improving the Programs & Events Dashboard is therefore about much more than software development.
It is about making Wikimedia education work easier to organize. It is about helping communities better understand participation and impact. It is about reducing friction for organizers. It is about making educational initiatives more visible across the movement. And ultimately, it is about building infrastructure that helps education communities grow sustainably over time.
The future of Wikimedia education will not depend only on the number of programs we run. It will also depend on whether the systems supporting those programs are strong enough to help communities learn from each other, demonstrate impact, and scale their work sustainably.
That is why infrastructure matters.
This article is part of the EduWiki Hub Programs & Events (P&E) Dashboard Project, which works to improve the Programs & Events Dashboard in response to the needs of the Wikimedia education community. Through its Technical Infrastructure Working Group, the Hub brings together community feedback and technical expertise to support improvements in the Dashboard’s usability, discoverability, campaign organization, and reporting. These efforts aim to make it easier for Wikimedia organizers and educators to coordinate activities, track participation, understand program outcomes, and build on one another’s work.
The project is supported by Wikimedia Brasil, which provides technical development support, and Wiki Education, the original developer of the Programs & Events Dashboard, which manages its backend and reviews proposed deployments.
Can you help us translate this article?
In order for this article to reach as many people as possible we would like your help. Can you translate this article to get the message out?
Start translation