County surveillance failed to detect that measles transmission reached epidemic threshold in schools

A nationwide analysis of measles vaccination records from more than 50,000 US schools shows that measles transmission risk crossed the threshold that can lead to epidemics at the school level in the 2–3 years before the 2025–2026 outbreaks, whereas county-level estimates always remained below that threshold.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles cases and outbreaks. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/measles/data-research/index.html (2026). This is the source of the primary surveillance data for the >3,500 confirmed US cases of the 2025–2026 measles epidemic.
Do, L. A. H. & Mulholland, K. Measles 2025. N. Engl. J. Med. 393, 2447–2458 (2025). A current review of the drivers of measles resurgence, including vaccine hesitancy and the erosion of population immunity.
Masters, N. B. et al. Fine-scale spatial clustering of measles nonvaccination that increases outbreak potential is obscured by aggregated reporting data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28506–28514 (2020). This study establishes that aggregated reporting hides fine-scale clustering of susceptibility — the principle that our study validates empirically across nationwide multiscale data.
Glasser, J. W., Feng, Z., Omer, S. B., Smith, P. J. & Rodewald, L. E. The effect of heterogeneity in uptake of the MMR vaccine on the potential for outbreaks of measles: a modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 599–605 (2016). This foundational modeling study shows that clustering of unvaccinated individuals can sustain outbreaks even when average coverage seems adequate.
Hackell, J. M. et al. Medical vs nonmedical immunization exemptions for child care and school attendance: policy statement. Pediatrics 156, e2025072714 (2025). This article provides current policy context for the exemption differences underlying divergent state susceptibility trajectories.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This is a summary of: Chen, S. & Bento, A. I. County, district and community-level measles transmission in the United States in 2013−2025. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04561-w (2026).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
County surveillance failed to detect that measles transmission reached epidemic threshold in schools. Nat Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04612-2
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04612-2

* A nationwide analysis of measles vaccination records from more than 50,000 US schools was conducted.
* Measles transmission risk crossed the threshold for school-level epidemics two to three years before the 2025–2026 outbreaks.
* County-level estimates consistently remained below the epidemic threshold.
* A modeling study showed that clustering of unvaccinated individuals can sustain measles outbreaks despite adequate average coverage.
* Studies identify vaccine hesitancy and population immunity erosion as drivers of measles resurgence.
* Policy context exists regarding differences in immunization exemptions influencing state susceptibility.

Nationwide analysis of measles vaccination records from over 50,000 US schools indicates that measles transmission risk crossed the threshold for potential school-level epidemics two to three years prior to the 2025–2026 outbreaks. County-level estimates consistently remained below this epidemic threshold. Foundational modeling studies have shown that clustering of unvaccinated individuals can sustain outbreaks even when average vaccine coverage appears adequate. Current literature points to vaccine hesitancy and the erosion of population immunity as drivers of measles resurgence. Policy context suggests that differences in immunization exemptions influence state susceptibility trajectories.

The data presents a significant divergence between localized surveillance and broad-scale risk assessment. County-level estimates failed to flag the necessary risk, suggesting that relying solely on aggregated local data obscures critical transmission dynamics occurring at the school level. This discrepancy highlights a structural gap where fine-scale spatial clustering of susceptibility is masked by aggregated reporting methods, as demonstrated in previous research. The implication is that standard public health metrics may underreport imminent risk when localized clusters exist, necessitating a focus beyond county-level aggregates to predict and prevent outbreaks effectively. The interaction between vaccine uptake heterogeneity and outbreak potential remains a critical factor, suggesting that mitigating resurgence requires accounting for fine-scale spatial patterns rather than relying solely on average coverage statistics. What assumptions about the representativeness of aggregated data allow this divergence to persist? How can surveillance systems be redesigned to prioritize the identification of localized transmission clusters over broad regional averages?

County surveillance failed to detect that measles transmission reached epidemic threshold in schools

Facts Only

Executive Summary

Full Take

Sentinel — Human

County surveillance failed to detect that measles transmission reached epidemic threshold in schools

Facts Only

Executive Summary

Full Take

Sentinel — Human