Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5139 out of 100, reading level.

This manuscript’s contents are a centuries-old mystery that still eludes scholars today. But is it really as cryptic as it seems, or are its answers hiding in plain sight?
At first glance, the Voynich manuscript doesn’t look like much. It’s an old book, about the size of a modern paperback, with colourful illustrations of plants and animals surrounding cursive handwritten script.
But on closer inspection, there’s something strange about the plants and animals depicted in the pages. They don’t resemble anything real. And the script isn’t in any recognisable language.
Called the ‘world's most mysterious manuscript,’ the Voynich manuscript has been eluding experts' attempts to decode or explain it for hundreds of years. What could it possibly mean?
A medieval compendium on herbs, healing, and the stars?
“We now know through radiocarbon dating that the Voynich manuscript was created during the early 15th century,” says author and journalist Garry J Shaw, speaking on the HistoryExtra podcast. Specifically, the evidence suggests the manuscript was made between 1404 and 1438.
As to where it was made, that’s less clear, though there are hints.
“There are clues in the style of the illustrations – and little hints like the merlins and the fortifications of a little castle – that suggest Northern Italy as the location it was created,” he adds.
Other than that, nothing is known about why the Voynich manuscript was made, who made it, or what purpose it serves.
The ‘language’ it is written in isn’t any known language, so scholars have divided the book into sections based on the illustrations.
“The first section is dedicated to plants,” Shaw says. “You'll see all these interesting plants, quite unusual ones, often with their roots included as well. There seems to be an emphasis on the roots, which may be a clue to what is going on here.” That part is known as the ‘herbal’ section.
- Read more | Unusual things found in medieval manuscripts
After that come sections on astronomy or astrology with what look like zodiac signs and constellations; bathing, as shown by naked women in waters with unusual creatures around them; cosmology, with fold-out pages showing islands and castles; pharmacy, shown by bits of plants and apothecary jars; and, finally, full pages of text broken up into short paragraphs, which have been interpreted as recipes.
All these things were “trendy” topics of interest for the elite at the time, Shaw notes.
The book has passed through many different hands since the 15th century, and there was a 200-year period where there was no record of its whereabouts. It's named after Wilfrid Voynich, who bought it in 1912 and was the last person to try to decipher it before it was donated to the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University in 1969, where it has been held since.
The language of the Voynich manuscript
The language the manuscript is written in has come to be known as ‘Voynichese’.
The text has some characteristics that suggest it is a ‘constructed language’ (a language intentionally created for a specific purpose such as to accompany a work of fiction, like Klingon in Star Trek) as opposed to a ‘natural’ language which develops naturally and changes over time.
But Shaw doesn’t think the manuscript is a constructed language, because interest in them didn’t really arise until the 17th century, “when scholars started realising that Latin wasn't working for them anymore to communicate their discoveries,” he says. “It doesn’t fit the timeline of the artificial language craze.”
Many people have assumed that it’s a code, or a cipher, for a natural language and therefore has some sort of meaning.
There is some evidence that this is true. For example, there are ‘words’ that are overrepresented in each of the sections, which could be keywords relating to each section’s topic. And there are patterns of word lengths and frequencies, characters that appear more often which could be vowels, and words that commonly follow each other – all of which suggest a grammatical system.
On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be any punctuation, and it has an incredibly regular structure, unlike most known languages. There are lots of words that have incredibly similar spellings or differ only by one letter, which would lead to nonsense if they could actually be ‘translated.’
And lots of people have tried deciphering the writing over the years, including comparing it to languages such as Ukrainian, Latin, Old Turkic, and Mandarin, with no success.
Shaw thinks that the cipher explanation is unlikely. “Ciphers at this time were quite simple and weren't that hard to break. Yet even the great cryptological minds have not broken the Voynich cipher yet, even with the great computing power of today,” he says.
The Black Death
Member exclusive | Listen to our six-part podcast series on how the Black Death shook the Middle Ages
Is the Voynich manuscript a hoax?
In a 2020 paper, medievalist and manuscript expert Lisa Fagin Davis wrote that she believes five different people worked on the Voynich script because of slight variations in the style of the handwriting throughout.
But Shaw says that the “greatest cost of producing a manuscript – up to 75 per cent – was normally hiring the scribes,” so it is unlikely that five different people would be paid to create it. Instead, he suggests that “some enterprising scribes” made it to entice someone rich into spending money.
“You see throughout history that people were just as interested in ripping people off in the past as they are today,” he says.
Because it looks like a medical compendium, complete with herbal recipes and therapeutic bathing practices that were of interest at the time, Shaw says he can imagine someone rich buying it, believing they could crack it – and not realising that they couldn’t until it was already bought for a high price.
He adds, “this was also a time of a great explosion of interest in book collecting, particularly among the elite who were trying to create fabulous libraries.” People would be willing to cough up a lot of money for unique, special books to add to their libraries, no matter the contents or if they had even read them. He thinks this is the most probable explanation.
“I love the Voynich mystery,” he concludes.
“I would love it to be some ingenious cipher from the past that breaks all of our knowledge of that time, or an ingenious early created language and script before the craze for them. So I sincerely hope I’m wrong, but unfortunately, I think the evidence points towards this being a hoax.”
Garry J Shaw was speaking to Emily Briffett on the HistoryExtra podcast. Listen to the full conversation.
Authors
Serafina Kenny is a freelance journalist specialising in the history of health, relationships, and social culture

Facts Only

The Voynich manuscript was created between 1404 and 1438, as determined by radiocarbon dating.
The manuscript contains illustrations of plants, animals, and celestial bodies, along with an unrecognized script.
It is divided into sections: herbal, astronomical, bathing, cosmological, pharmaceutical, and recipes.
The manuscript’s origin is traced to Northern Italy based on stylistic clues in the illustrations.
The script, called "Voynichese," does not match any known language.
The manuscript was purchased by Wilfrid Voynich in 1912 and donated to Yale University’s Beinecke Library in 1969.
Multiple attempts to decipher the text, including comparisons to languages like Latin and Mandarin, have failed.
Some scholars suggest the manuscript may be a hoax, possibly created by scribes to sell to wealthy collectors.
The manuscript’s purpose, author, and intended audience remain unknown.
The text exhibits patterns such as repeated "words" and grammatical structures, but lacks punctuation and has highly regular spelling.

Executive Summary

The Voynich manuscript, created between 1404 and 1438, remains one of the most enigmatic texts of the Middle Ages. Its pages feature illustrations of unfamiliar plants, animals, and celestial diagrams, accompanied by an indecipherable script known as "Voynichese." The manuscript is divided into sections—herbal, astronomical, bathing, cosmological, pharmaceutical, and recipes—suggesting it may have been a compendium of elite interests at the time. Radiocarbon dating places its origin in early 15th-century Northern Italy, though its purpose, author, and intended audience remain unknown. Despite centuries of attempts, no one has successfully decoded the text, leading to theories ranging from an elaborate cipher to an early constructed language or even a hoax. The manuscript’s journey includes a 200-year gap in its recorded history before being acquired by Wilfrid Voynich in 1912 and later donated to Yale University’s Beinecke Library in 1969. While some scholars argue the text exhibits linguistic patterns, others, like Garry J. Shaw, propose it may have been a scam targeting wealthy book collectors during a period of heightened interest in rare manuscripts.

Full Take

The Voynich manuscript’s enduring mystery invites both fascination and skepticism. At its strongest, the narrative presents a compelling case for the manuscript as a genuine artifact of medieval knowledge, possibly an encrypted or constructed language ahead of its time. The structured sections, linguistic patterns, and historical context of elite interests in herbalism and astrology lend credibility to the idea that it served a purpose—whether practical, symbolic, or even esoteric. However, the absence of punctuation, the uncanny regularity of the script, and the failure of modern cryptography to crack it raise doubts. The hoax theory, while less romantic, aligns with historical patterns of fraud in rare book markets, where novelty and exclusivity could command high prices.
Patterns detected: ARC-0024 Ambiguity (the manuscript’s purpose is framed as both mysterious and potentially fraudulent, leaving room for multiple interpretations), ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (the narrative oscillates between "unsolvable cipher" and "elaborate hoax" without definitive evidence for either).
The root cause of this narrative lies in humanity’s fascination with the unknown and the desire to assign meaning to the inexplicable. The manuscript’s ambiguity mirrors broader historical trends where gaps in knowledge are filled with speculation, from alchemy to conspiracy theories. The implications for human agency are profound: if the Voynich is a hoax, it reflects the ease with which even educated elites can be deceived; if genuine, it challenges our understanding of medieval intellectual capabilities.
Bridge questions: What other historical artifacts might be misinterpreted due to modern assumptions about language and knowledge? How does the Voynich manuscript’s ambiguity serve as a mirror for contemporary debates about truth and deception?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign might exploit the manuscript’s mystery to undermine trust in scholarly consensus, framing it as either a cover-up or a testament to hidden knowledge. However, the article presents multiple perspectives without pushing a single agenda, suggesting no alignment with such a playbook.