After last week’s catastrophic flash flooding caused hundreds of deaths and an estimated $5 billion of destruction in Nepal, some board members of the UN's new loss and damage fund board have called for an extraordinary meeting to allocate money to help the Himalayan country.
Following a direct appeal for funding from Nepal's government on Monday, developing-country board members gathered online and eight signed a letter, seen by Climate Home News, asking the fund's board to hold a meeting to respond to the request.
The letter, signed by eight African, Asian and Least Developed Country board members, said the debris-laden torrent - which scientists believe was unleashed by a glacial slope collapsing after unusually hot weather - constitutes "precisely the kind of climate-related extreme weather events the fund was established to address".
For 15 years we’ve rigorously reported on the decisions shaping our climate.Upgrading to a paid subscription is how readers like you help keep this work going.
After last week’s catastrophic flash flooding caused hundreds of deaths and an estimated $5 billion of destruction in Nepal, some board members of the UN's new loss and damage fund board have called for an extraordinary meeting to allocate money to help the Himalayan country.
Following a direct appeal for funding from Nepal's government on Monday, developing-country board members gathered online and eight signed a letter, seen by Climate Home News, asking the fund's board to hold a meeting to respond to the request.
The letter, signed by eight African, Asian and Least Developed Country board members, said the debris-laden torrent - which scientists believe was unleashed by a glacial slope collapsing after unusually hot weather - constitutes "precisely the kind of climate-related extreme weather events the fund was established to address".
"The scale of loss of life, displacement, and destruction of energy, transport, and economic infrastructure warrants the board's urgent consideration of how the fund's existing instruments should be mobilised to support Nepal's government and affected communities," the letter said.
We need a strategy for navigating the huge risks to ecosystems and societies
The rules of the fund's initial phase, which it is now in, allow for it to support "rapid response", the letter noted. The fund's governing instrument says it can provide funds "complementary to humanitarian actions taken immediately after an extreme weather event" as well as funds for "immediate or long-term, reconstruction or rehabilitation", the letter added.
Governments agreed at UN climate talks to set up the fund in 2022 and it launched its first call for proposals at the end of last year. It received 180 submissions, mainly for long-term projects to help countries reduce the risks from climate threats, like improving water infrastructure in Jamaica or flood response in Bangladesh.
After delaying decisions at its last board meeting as it continued to work out processes, it has yet to approve any funding requests. Despite being set up on the back of the 2022 floods in Pakistan, the board has not yet given out any money in response to climate disasters nor expressed a clear willingness to do so.
The secretariat of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication. A few days ago, it expressed solidarity for those affected by the disaster in a social media post.
Rapid response precedent
The board members signing the letter on Nepal want to set a precedent, with the letter saying the board should consider "any procedural lessons" the response to the flooding "offer for strengthening the Fund's rapid-response modalities and operational protocols for sudden-onset extreme weather events".
Harjeet Singh, global convenor of the Fill the Fund campaign, told Climate Home News civil society has pushed "really hard" for the FRLD to be a rapid response fund rather than just inviting requests for project funding and reviewing them at regular board meetings as other UN climate funds do.
"Climate disasters like the one unfolding in Nepal cannot wait for scheduled committee cycles," he said. "The Loss and Damage Fund was built for moments exactly like this."
Nepal has received multi-million dollar humanitarian pledges from several governments already and the United Nations' Central Emergency Response Fund is designed to rapidly disburse aid cash for disasters.
But Singh - also founding director of India's Satat Sampada Climate Foundation - said that, with disasters becoming more frequent and severe, the humanitarian system cannot support all countries in their recovery efforts and the fund should bridge the gap.
"The Board Co-Chairs must heed the call of developing nations, convene an emergency session immediately, and prove that this Fund is ready to deliver real support when frontline communities need it most," he told Climate Home News.
While the FRLD's response to Nepal's recent disaster could set an important precedent, it is only likely to be of limited practical help. The fund's rules mean it can only give out a maximum of $20 million to each project in its current initial phase. With only $820 million pledged by rich countries and not all of that yet delivered, it has allocated a total of $350 million to spend so far and without further contributions could run of money next year.
Nepalese climate negotiator Manjeet Dhakal, who visited the affected area just days before the flood, told The Nationmagazine that while $20 million "may only be a symbolic gesture", it "could set an important precedent for how the fund responds when such disasters strike vulnerable countries in the future".
The government's preliminary estimate of the damage is $5 billion, with many homes and critical infrastructure destroyed, as well as over 1,000 people dead.
A letter to the FRLD board from Nepal's finance and environment ministers said that Nepal had only contributed "negligibly to global greenhouse gas emissions yet continues to bear disproportionate and escalating climate impacts".
Requesting the fund's board take a special decision to allocate funding to Nepal, the ministers emphasised that "time is of the essence". "A prompt response would help protect affected populations, restore essential services, prevent further suffering and demonstrate that the fund can translate international solidarity into timely support for vulnerable countries and communities when it is most urgently needed," they wrote.
Glaciers 'melt like butter'
Despite initial reports of an earthquake, the US Geological Survey has said the floods were caused by a glacier collapsing and the resulting landslide hitting the bottom of the valley causing "subsequent catastrophic impacts downstream".
Alton Byers, a scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder's Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, told journalists this week that global warming has seen glaciers recede, glacial lakes forming and glacial lake outburst floods increasing.
He said that a heating glacier is like butter taken out of the refrigerator. "It becomes mushy. It no longer has the ability to hold together. What that means is that masses of rock and glaciers no longer are as resistant to gravity as they once were," he explained. "Add to that melting water at altitude, which lubricates the interface between the rock and the glacier and you get an increased likelihood of slippage."
He added that a trigger - like gravity or an earth tremor - can then set off the sudden release of masses of bedrock and glacial ice, "which is what happened last week".
As well as reducing emissions to rein in climate change, Byers said that authorities can adapt to climate change by not building in flood plains. Many of the destroyed buildings in Nepal were located in places that have flooded before, he noted.
The disaster took place on the Himalayan border of Nepal and Tibet, which is governed by China. Chinese state media are reporting at least 16 people dead and hundreds missing. China's government has made no appeal to the loss and damage fund and the board's letter does not mention China or Tibet.
The FRLD board's co-chairs are now expected to respond to the letter, with any extraordinary board meeting likely to be held online, so that members from around the world can attend at short notice.
Our unprecedented reporting provides experts and professionals globally with the analysis and insight they need to navigate the most important climate issues.
Trusted by the UN, World Bank, and governments around the world, sign up today and see why our award-winning coverage has been considered the authority for almost 15 years.
Essential
£0
A few top stories each week alongside our Climate Weekly newsletter.
While many countries remain locked in a reactive cycle of disaster response, public policy can shift investment upstream to build resilience and cut risks
As governments look towards COP31, India must push not only for more adaptation finance, but for funds to arrive in time for projects that limit disasters like Assam’s floods
Pacific leaders will launch the first call for proposals next week for a new regional fund designed to swiftly channel climate finance to local communities
With fossil fuel firms set to report huge profits off the back of the Iran war amid heatwaves and wildfires in Europe, public debate is asking who should pay for the damage?
Civil society wants a mechanism to be launched at COP31 but insists it must be more than a talking shop and include different social groups and a wide view of transition
While many countries remain locked in a reactive cycle of disaster response, public policy can shift investment upstream to build resilience and cut risks
As governments look towards COP31, India must push not only for more adaptation finance, but for funds to arrive in time for projects that limit disasters like Assam’s floods
Pacific leaders will launch the first call for proposals next week for a new regional fund designed to swiftly channel climate finance to local communities
A new bill prevents corporations being sued for the climate damage their emissions cause, as the government says climate action should be handled at the national level not in court
The government is restricting nickel production to push up prices but producing more sustainable nickel for a premium requires addressing the industry’s coal issue
15 years covering the climate decisions that matter.
Create a free account to join the community of readers — diplomats, negotiators, and campaigners — who rely on Climate Home News.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Facts Only
* Flash flooding in Nepal caused hundreds of deaths and an estimated $5 billion in destruction.
* Some board members of the UN's loss and damage fund called for an extraordinary meeting to allocate money to help Nepal.
* Developing-country board members gathered online and eight signed a letter requesting a response to Nepal's funding appeal.
* The signatories stated the debris-laden torrent constituted climate-related extreme weather events the fund was established to address.
* The request emphasized the scale of loss of life, displacement, and destruction warranting consideration of the fund's instruments.
* The letter suggested mobilizing existing funds for "rapid response" and "immediate or long-term, reconstruction or rehabilitation."
* The fund's initial phase allows support for "rapid response" and funds complementary to humanitarian actions and reconstruction.
* The Fund has not yet approved any funding requests despite being set up following the 2022 Pakistan floods.
* Nepalese ministers emphasized the urgent need for a prompt response to protect populations and restore services.
* Scientists believe the flooding was caused by a glacial slope collapsing after unusually hot weather.
* A scientist stated that melting glaciers increase the likelihood of sudden release of ice masses due to warming and lubrication.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The dynamic presented here highlights a structural tension between the established, slow-moving architecture of international climate finance mechanisms and the acute, immediate demands of climate disasters. The call for an emergency board meeting by developing-country representatives reflects a critical recognition that existing protocols are ill-equipped to handle the immediacy of climate-related crises. The argument shifts from procedural adherence—reviewing applications through scheduled board meetings—to recognizing climate events as immediate emergencies requiring swift financial action, pushing for a shift toward a rapid response paradigm.
A significant pattern emerges regarding the operational constraints of the Loss and Damage Fund. Despite its mandate to address loss and damage, the fund's current structure, which involves a lengthy process for funding approval and limited existing capital—only $350 million allocated to date—creates a gap between international solidarity expressed by member states and tangible, timely support for frontline communities. This institutional inertia contrasts sharply with the scientific urgency described by the evidence of glacial instability, which points toward events that defy conventional scheduling.
The underlying implication is one of agency: whether international mechanisms can truly translate high-level political acknowledgment into effective, immediate relief for vulnerable populations. The focus on establishing precedent for "rapid response modalities" suggests a struggle to redefine the fund’s function from a long-term risk mitigation tool into an operational emergency conduit. This necessitates examining who controls the procedural levers of climate finance and whether institutional readiness aligns with existential vulnerability.
Bridge Questions: If immediate, non-procedural allocation is deemed necessary for survival, what specific governance changes are required within the Fund to enable such agility without undermining accountability? How can mechanisms be established to ensure that appeals for rapid response supersede standard committee cycles during acute crises? What systems of accountability must be put in place to verify that pledged funds translate into timely support rather than remaining stalled in bureaucratic processes?
Sentinel — Human
The text reads like well-sourced, engaged journalism that synthesizes unfolding events with expert commentary, exhibiting characteristics of human editorial narrative construction.