Skip to content
Chimera readability score 81 out of 100, Specialist reading level.

April 29, 2026
The Google Research Science team
Since introducing Empirical Research Assistance in the fall, Google Research scientists have been using it to address real-world applications in epidemiology, cosmology, atmospheric monitoring, and neuroscience, providing a hint of AI’s transformational capabilities to accelerate scientific discoveries.
AI’s capabilities to advance scientific discovery are growing every week, with outcomes that promise not just to enable breakthrough discoveries but to transform how science is done. In September, we released a preprint introducing Empirical Research Assistance (ERA) to help scientists generate expert-level empirical software. That included novel solutions to six diverse and challenging benchmark problems in fields ranging from cell biology to neuroscience.
Since then, Google scientists and our academic collaborators have been developing and using ERA to test its capabilities and explore potential applications. These efforts go beyond proof-of-concept tests to real-world scenarios in epidemiology, geospatial analysis, and more, revealing how AI can democratize access to the power of computational modeling, find solutions to unsolved problems, unlock deeper insights from existing data collections, and go beyond black-box modeling to discover interpretable, mechanistically accurate solutions.
It’s been inspiring to see the excitement of Google research scientists, visiting faculty researchers and academic collaborators as they experiment with ERA. We are thrilled to see these capabilities expand as it nears more widespread availability to support AI-assisted scientific discovery for global benefit.
Public health: Hospitalization forecasts for flu, COVID-19, and RSV
In the preprint, authors used ERA to predict U.S. hospitalizations for COVID-19, showing that it was able to retrospectively match or outperform existing tools from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and leading research institutions. As a follow-on effort, the team has now expanded to generate forecasts not just for COVID, but also for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and has been submitting prospective forecasts in real time every week.
When the CDC’s long-running flu forecast challenge opened in November for the 2025-26 season, Google began submitting weekly forecasts for every U.S. state and at all time horizons, up to four weeks in the future. Late last year Google also joined CDC’s year-round live forecasts for state-level COVID-19 hospitalizations, as well as CDC’s recently launched hub for forecasting RSV. Public leaderboards for flu and COVID-19 run by Nicholas Reich, a biostatistics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and consultant on this project, show that Google has been performing at or near the top of both leaderboards during the time they have been submitting forecasts to each project (see figure). Although there is no public leaderboard for RSV, internal analyses show a similarly strong performance.
An AI-powered tool that can meet or exceed the forecasting accuracy of leading public health agency tools promises huge public health benefit for tracking newer conditions and in broader locations, democratizing access to computational modeling for epidemiology for a wider range of infections and geographies.
Cosmology: Cosmic strings and gravitational energy radiation
Cosmic strings are theoretical defects in the fabric of spacetime, believed to have formed in the early universe and predicted to emit gravitational radiation. Calculating the spectrum of this emitted energy is an unsolved problem, largely because the governing equations contain singularities — mathematical points where values approach infinity and traditional models break down. Last fall, a paper used OpenAI’s GPT-5 to find a partial solution for the gravitational energy radiating from cosmic strings, but only for the simplest case of a square loop where the angle α = π/2, or 90 degrees. A unified exact solution — a single, complete mathematical formula that solved the integral perfectly — remained an open problem.
To address this, we combined ERA with Gemini Deep Think. By systematically exploring mathematical techniques capable of navigating these singularities, we successfully derived six general solutions and a concise formula for the asymptotic limit, which we shared in March. This illustrates the powerful potential of pairing ERA with advanced LLMs to unlock precise, novel solutions at the frontier of cosmology.
Climate and sustainability: Using weather satellites to monitor CO2
Regular observations of carbon dioxide (CO2) began at Hawaii’s Mauna Loa Observatory in the late 1950s, yielding the iconic Keeling Curve that documents rising global CO2 concentrations in Earth’s atmosphere. Mapping human greenhouse gas emissions and understanding how plants, trees, soils and oceans absorb those emissions requires us to track how CO2 varies across regions and over time. Current space-based CO2 sensors, like NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) were designed to make high-precision observations, but they only map a tiny fraction of the Earth’s surface and return to each location just once every 16 days. Geostationary satellites, such as the GOES East satellite designed to support weather forecasting, orbit the Earth from a much higher altitude and can scan an entire hemisphere every 10 minutes. However, none of the existing geostationary satellites were designed to map CO2.
Google researchers used ERA to develop a single-pixel, physics-guided neural network to distill a column-averaged CO2 signal from the existing GOES East observations. To do so, the model combines data from 16 wavelength bands from GOES-East with lower-troposphere meteorology, solar angles, and day of the year. After training on the sparse observations from OCO-2 and OCO-3, the model was then able to derive estimates of column-averaged CO2 everywhere and every 10 minutes.
Research shared at the International Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Measurements from Space shows that the AI-developed model is able to leverage the high spatial and temporal density of the GOES East observations to track column-averaged CO2 with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. Comparisons against independent data from additional years of OCO-2 observations, and from the ground-based total column carbon observing network, confirm the model’s ability to capture real CO2 variability.
These results show how an AI algorithm can extract additional value from existing observational instruments, especially for resource-intensive satellite research missions. This project is among several questions related to climate and greenhouse gases that Google researchers are exploring using ERA.
Neuroscience: Discovering mechanisms of neural circuits
Although we can now map tens of thousands of neurons in living brains, untangling the functional circuits is the next step. Google researchers used ERA to tackle this challenge in both real and simulated zebrafish, a popular model organism for studying how a vertebrate detects stimuli, processes information and responds. In natural settings, light passing through ripples on the water’s surface creates patterns of light and dark stripes on the seafloor or riverbed. Zebrafish have evolved to instinctively respond to changes in those stripes in order to stay in shallow water and avoid getting swept away.
In a new study, we looked at the zebrafish neural circuit corresponding to this environmental stimulus. We provided ERA with the wiring diagram of simZFish, a simplified zebrafish body and brain simulator. Guided by this information — revealing what cellular connections exist, but omitting the mathematical rules that govern them — ERA was able to propose circuits that connect stimulus to neural activity to motor response. Testing these AI-hypothesized circuits against new visual stimuli showed that they were not just statistical shortcuts, but accurate neural mechanisms that generalize to other, similar situations.
This builds on results from the preprint, which showed that AI-developed models could outperform baseline methods at predicting the activity of over 70,000 neurons captured in the Zebrafish Activity Prediction Benchmark, ZAPBench, a dataset of neural activity from experiments that mimic typical environmental stimuli.
While ZAPBench proved ERA's ability to find state-of-the-art predictive solutions, the simulated environment reveals how it can go beyond black-box modeling. Equipped with structural information, ERA discovered interpretable, mechanistically accurate solutions, providing a powerful blueprint for addressing scientific grand challenges in living brains.
Conclusion: AI-assisted science
These four projects are among a growing list of results that show how LLM-backed systems can advance science and accelerate the pace of discovery. These examples represent a range of fields and also types of problems, from theoretical math to data forecasting to analyzing data from observational instruments and simulation output. They also showcase the potential for AI-enabled science to solve open problems, democratize access to computational modeling, and maximize the utility of existing observational data. We’re excited about the progress being unlocked by ERA and other Google tools — including co-scientist and PAT — designed to accelerate scientific discovery.
Acknowledgments
We’d like to thank our collaborators on developing ERA, and all the scientists who are among the early adopters. The epidemiological forecasting work is led by Zahra Shamsi, Sarah Martinson, Nicholas Reich, Martyna Plomecka, and Brian Williams. The cosmological paper is authored by Michael Brenner, Vincent Cohen-Addad, and David Woodruff. The research on carbon dioxide monitoring is led by Aarón Sonabend-W, Sean Campbell, Renee Johnston, Vishal Batchu, Carl Elkin, Christopher Van Arsdale, John Platt, and Anna Michalak. The paper on neural circuits was authored by Jan-Matthis Lückmann, Viren Jain, and Michał Januszewski. We also acknowledge leadership support from John Platt, Michael Brenner, Lizzie Dorfman, Vip Gupta, Alison Lentz, Erica Brand, Katherine Chou, Ronit Levavi Morad, Yossi Matias, and James Manyika.

Facts Only

Google Research introduced Empirical Research Assistance (ERA) in September 2025 to help scientists generate empirical software.
ERA has been applied to epidemiology, cosmology, climate science, and neuroscience.
Google scientists used ERA to forecast U.S. hospitalizations for COVID-19, influenza, and RSV, submitting real-time predictions to CDC leaderboards.
Google’s flu and COVID-19 forecasts have ranked at or near the top of CDC leaderboards since submissions began.
In cosmology, ERA combined with Gemini Deep Think derived six general solutions for gravitational energy radiation from cosmic strings.
A paper using OpenAI’s GPT-5 had previously solved only a simplified case of cosmic string radiation.
For climate monitoring, ERA developed a model to estimate CO2 levels from GOES East satellite data, trained on OCO-2 and OCO-3 observations.
The CO2 model provides estimates every 10 minutes with high spatial resolution, validated against independent data.
In neuroscience, ERA proposed neural circuits in zebrafish that generalize to new stimuli, moving beyond black-box modeling.
ERA outperformed baseline methods in predicting neural activity in the Zebrafish Activity Prediction Benchmark (ZAPBench).
Collaborators include academic researchers from institutions like the University of Massachusetts Amherst and NASA.
ERA is part of Google’s broader AI tools for scientific discovery, including co-scientist and PAT.

Executive Summary

Google Research scientists have been leveraging Empirical Research Assistance (ERA), an AI tool introduced in September 2025, to accelerate scientific discovery across multiple fields. ERA helps generate expert-level empirical software, enabling breakthroughs in epidemiology, cosmology, climate science, and neuroscience. In public health, ERA has been used to forecast hospitalizations for COVID-19, influenza, and RSV, with Google’s models performing at or near the top of CDC leaderboards for flu and COVID-19 predictions. In cosmology, ERA combined with Gemini Deep Think derived six general solutions for gravitational energy radiation from cosmic strings, addressing a long-standing mathematical challenge. For climate monitoring, ERA developed a model to extract CO2 data from existing weather satellites, providing unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. In neuroscience, ERA discovered interpretable neural circuits in zebrafish, demonstrating its ability to uncover mechanistic insights rather than just statistical patterns. These applications highlight AI’s potential to democratize computational modeling, solve open problems, and maximize the utility of existing data. While promising, these advancements are still in early stages, with broader accessibility and real-world validation pending.

Full Take

This article presents a compelling case for AI’s role in accelerating scientific discovery, but it warrants scrutiny through multiple lenses. The strongest version of this narrative highlights ERA’s versatility—from forecasting infectious diseases to solving theoretical physics problems—demonstrating AI’s potential to democratize computational modeling and extract insights from existing data. However, the piece leans heavily on Google’s internal validation, with limited independent peer review or replication discussed. The cosmology breakthrough, for instance, is framed as a definitive advance, yet the absence of external validation or comparison to traditional methods raises questions about robustness. Similarly, the public health forecasts are impressive but rely on CDC leaderboards, which may not fully capture real-world variability or edge cases.
Patterns detected: none. The narrative avoids overt manipulation, but the framing subtly emphasizes Google’s leadership in AI-assisted science, which could reflect institutional bias. The root cause paradigm here is the techno-optimist assumption that AI can universally accelerate discovery, a claim that merits caution. While ERA’s applications are promising, the long-term implications—such as over-reliance on AI models without mechanistic transparency—remain unexplored. Who benefits? Primarily researchers with access to Google’s tools, though the article suggests broader democratization. Who bears costs? Potentially smaller institutions lacking resources to adopt such systems.
Bridge questions: How would these models perform in resource-limited settings? What safeguards exist against overfitting or biased training data? Would independent replication of these results strengthen confidence in ERA’s capabilities? The counterstrike scan reveals no overt attack pattern, but the absence of critical limitations or failed cases in the narrative aligns with a common tech-industry tendency to highlight successes while downplaying challenges.