Skip to content
Chimera readability score 61 out of 100, Academic reading level.

The archtop guitar is a uniquely American instrument which can be traced directly to the creative genius of one person – Orville Gibson.
In the mid 1890s, the man who later formed the company started building guitars and mandolins with carved tops and backs, and though his creations were quite different from a modern jazz guitar, there’s no question his instruments were the inspiration for the archtops that followed.
Upon first inspection, this 1935 Gibson appears to be an L-5 neck on a Super 400 body. Labeled an L-5 Special, it most likely is the earliest 18″-wide archtop f-hole model made by any builder. It is also very likely a prototype of the Super 400, as it precedes the introduction of that model by several months.
Though it appears to be the earliest f-hole guitar with this body size and shape, Gibson would have had forms for it dating back to oval-soundhole instruments built by Orville. Gibson’s first f-hole archtop was the 16″ L-5, and one known example (made in 1923) was signed by Lloyd Loar, an acoustic engineer at Gibson (more Loar-signed models were made through December of ’24).
The L-5 remained the only archtop f-hole model in Gibson’s line until the introduction of the L-10 in 1929 (though it was not shown their catalog until ’31) and the L-12 in 1930, both with 16″ bodies.
Gibson did not produce any archtop f-hole guitars larger than 16″ until 1935, when it introduced the 17″ “Advanced” L-5, L-7, L-10, and L-12 models, then followed with the introduction of the 18″ Super 400 (the original version used the body form designed by Orville with a 121/2″ upper bout, and, early in the history of the company, a few were made with 18″ lower bout and 243/4″ scale). In early ’37, the Super 400’s body was given an enlarged upper bout (135/8″) and the scale was lengthened to 251/2″. The Advanced models not only had a larger body, but fancier Art Deco ornamentation with flashy inlays and bold bindings. Prior to 1930, the L-5 had narrow script “The Gibson” and “flowerpot” peghead inlays with simple dot fingerboard inlays. By 1930, the L-5 had block inlays starting at the third fret, but overall ornamentation of 16″ guitars was understated compared to the Advanced 17″ guitars of ’35 onward.
In 1931, Epiphone entered the market aggressively by introducing a line of archtop f-hole acoustics ranging from small-body student models on up to the 163/8″ Deluxe. Gibson was caught by surprise but responded in ’32 with the competing L-50, L-75, and L-7 models; Epiphone made many of its earliest f-hole archtops with slightly wider bodies than their Gibson counterparts, and continued the trend even after Gibson introduced the Advanced models. In an effort to surpass Gibson’s 18″ Super 400, the Epiphone Emperor had an 181/2″ body when introduced in ’35, while the Epiphone Triumph, Broadway, and Deluxe were enlarged to 173/8″ to trump Gibson’s 17″ Advanced models. Not to be outdone, circa ’36, D’Angelico started producing the 18″ New Yorker and 17″ Excel models, followed shortly by Stromberg’s 19″ Master 400 and Master 300.
The L-5 Special featured here has a Super 400-style 18″ body, spruce top with f holes, figured maple back and sides with sunburst finish, multiple body bindings, maple L-5-style neck with walnut backstripe, ebony fretboard with pearl block inlays, and pearl peghead inlays. Gibson records indicate it was shipped to Coy Davison on September 6, 1935. According to research by Joe Spann (Spann’s Guide to Gibson 1902-1941), Davison was employed at Gibson as a string tester from 1937 to ’39. According to his family, he played music professionally in the ’30s and onward, and presumably was a player of some merit.
At Gibson, the guitar was listed as “Spl L-5” both times it was returned for repair – in August of ’36 and December of ’42. Though it’s clear the guitar has been modified, Gibson records don’t provide insight about the work that was completed. However, photos provided by the Davison family not only show the original appearance of this guitar, but help create a timeline for the modification in the late ’30s and early ’40s. In photos from the mid/late ’30s, the guitar has a Super 400 tailpiece (without the model name engraving) and pickguard, engraved/pen-back Grover tuners, a bell-shaped truss cover, and sunburst top finish with bound f holes. In later photos, it has an L-5-style pickguard, Grover Imperial tuners, and a natural-finish top with unbound f holes (natural finish was not standard until ’38, though it was available as a custom option). With the exception of the truss cover, which had clearly been changed in the 1938 photo, all modifications appear to have taken place at the Gibson factory from 1940 to ’42.
Though this instrument has been modified significantly from its original specs, the changes were made at Gibson not long after it was built. Prototypes were viewed as experimental, and as a result were frequently modified in the course of testing. It’s interesting to see that remarkably detailed records have been preserved for this and numerous other Gibsons. Quite a few salesman samples – and a surprising number of instruments – were shipped and returned several times, some even reconditioned prior to being re-sold. This instrument represents the final stage of a model’s evolution, and as such is an important piece of Gibson history.
Lynn Wheelwright and André Duchossoir (1949-2020) contributed research to this feature, which was originally published in the January ’15 issue of VG.
This article originally appeared in VG’s November 2025 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

Facts Only

* The archtop guitar is traced to Orville Gibson's creation of guitars and mandolins with carved tops and backs in the mid-1890s.
* A 1935 Gibson is inspected as an L-5 neck on a Super 400 body.
* This 1935 model likely represents the earliest 18″-wide archtop f-hole model by any builder and a prototype of the Super 400.
* Gibson had forms for oval-soundhole instruments dating back to Orville's work.
* The first f-hole archtop was the 16″ L-5, with a known 1923 example signed by Lloyd Loar.
* The L-5 was the only archtop f-hole model in Gibson’s line until the introduction of the L-10 and L-12 models in 1929 and 1930, respectively.
* Larger bodies were introduced starting in 1935 with the 17″ "Advanced" models and the 18″ Super 400.
* The featured L-5 Special had an 18″ Super 400-style body, spruce top with f holes, figured maple back and sides, and a sunburst finish.
* Modifications to the guitar occurred at the Gibson factory from 1940 to 1942.
* These modifications included changes to tailpiece, pickguard, tuners, and the top finish.

Executive Summary

The archtop guitar traces its origin to Orville Gibson, who developed earlier carved tops and backs for guitars and mandolins in the mid-1890s, which inspired subsequent archtops. A specific 1935 Gibson instrument is described as an L-5 neck on a Super 400 body and is likely the earliest 18″-wide archtop f-hole model made by any builder, potentially a prototype of the Super 400. Gibson had forms for oval-soundhole instruments dating back to Orville's work, with the first f-hole archtop being the 16″ L-5, exemplified by a 1923 model signed by Lloyd Loar. The L-5 remained the sole archtop f-hole model in Gibson’s line until the introduction of larger models like the L-10 and L-12, both with 16″ bodies. Later, Gibson introduced larger bodies in 1935 with the 17″ "Advanced" models and then the 18″ Super 400. Competitors, Epiphone and D’Angelico, entered the market with archtop f-hole acoustics, prompting Gibson to introduce competing models. The specific guitar featured was shipped to Coy Davison in 1935. Over time, the instrument underwent modifications at the Gibson factory between 1940 and 1942, including changes to hardware and finish, reflecting an evolutionary stage in model development.

Full Take

The narrative of this instrument functions as a history of iterative design, where an initial prototype evolves through commercial competition and factory modification. The transition from Gibson's foundational work by Orville Gibson to the later models illustrates a tension between creative genius (Gibson) and industrial realization, complicated by the reactive strategies of competitors like Epiphone and D’Angelico. The significance shifts depending on whether one views the instrument as an artifact of early innovation or a case study in late-stage industrial refinement.
The evidence of multiple factory modifications underscores that prototypes are not static; they exist within a dynamic process where experimental forms are subjected to commercial pressures, leading to phased evolution rather than discrete development steps. This pattern suggests that perceived "final" forms often arise from an accumulation of necessary adjustments driven by external market forces and internal testing protocols rather than pure, linear artistic progression. The detailed tracking of alterations across years implies that the history of a physical object is not just about its initial design but about the continuous negotiation between an artist's vision and industrial capability.
What assumptions shape the reading of this timeline? Does the focus on modifications inherently devalue the original theoretical design, or does it simply map the reality of production? If the ultimate value lies in the accumulated history of evolution, how do we separate aesthetic development from manufacturing compromise? What is the nature of the relationship between the inspiration provided by an individual genius and the subsequent historical fact of industrial adaptation?

L — Arc Codex