Multidimensional Political Attitudes and Polarization Across 141 Countries

Physics > Physics and Society
[Submitted on 23 Sep 2026]
Title:Multidimensional Political Attitudes and Polarization Across 141 Countries
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Societies worldwide are described as increasingly polarized, yet issue polarization -- how divided a society is over political positions -- has been measured almost entirely on a single left-right axis developed in Western democracies. Whether that axis describes political division elsewhere is largely untested, because no survey measures political attitudes on multiple dimensions across many countries. Here, we harmonize 1,299 items from nine cross-national survey programs and 23 national election studies to place 1.14 million people from 141 countries on four dimensions: social liberalism, economic left-right, democratic commitment, and anti-elite sentiment. A single left-right axis does not describe political division in most of the world. The median within-country correlation between a person's social and economic positions is -0.015. Societies differ instead in what they are divided about, and they do so by region. European countries divide most often over social liberalism, East Asian and Arab countries over democratic commitment, Latin American countries over economic left-right, and African countries over anti-elite sentiment. Of the 81 countries measured on all four dimensions, 39 are most divided on a dimension no left-right scale would capture. Most political disagreement lies within countries rather than between them, at 58 to 88 percent of the variance. Ideological constraint, long treated as a property of mass publics, holds in nineteen of the eighty-three we can test, most strongly in the United States at +0.70, and there it is concentrated among the politically attentive. Understanding political conflict therefore requires asking not how polarized a society is but what it is polarized about. Our released item bank and fitted parameters place respondents from any future survey on the same scale without re-estimation, once that survey's items are harmonized to the bank.
Current browse context:
physics.soc-ph
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Facts Only

* 1,299 items were harmonized from nine cross-national survey programs and 23 national election studies.
* Data covers 141 countries.
* Four dimensions measured are social liberalism, economic left-right, democratic commitment, and anti-elite sentiment.
* The median within-country correlation between social and economic positions is -0.015.
* European countries divide most often over social liberalism.
* East Asian and Arab countries divide most often over democratic commitment.
* Latin American countries divide most often over economic left-right.
* African countries divide most often over anti-elite sentiment.
* 39 of the 81 measured countries are most divided on a dimension not captured by a left-right scale.
* 58 to 88 percent of political disagreement lies within countries rather than between them.
* In the United States, ideological constraint is strongest at +0.70 among the politically attentive.

Executive Summary

Societies worldwide exhibit polarization, yet existing measures focus primarily on a single left-right axis common in Western democracies, leaving the extent of political division across other dimensions untested globally. The study harmonized data from 1,299 items across nine cross-national surveys and 23 national election studies from 141 countries to measure attitudes across four dimensions: social liberalism, economic left-right, democratic commitment, and anti-elite sentiment. Correlation between social and economic positions within countries is very low, with a median within-country correlation of -0.015. Political division patterns vary significantly by region; European countries are most divided over social liberalism, East Asian and Arab countries over democratic commitment, Latin American countries over economic left-right, and African countries over anti-elite sentiment. Of the 81 measured countries, 39 experience divisions across dimensions not captured by a simple left-right scale. The vast majority of political disagreement occurs within countries rather than between them, accounting for 58 to 88 percent of the variance.

Full Take

The primary implication of this research is that viewing global political conflict solely through a Western left-right lens provides an incomplete and misleading picture of societal division. The finding that variation in polarization occurs along different axes depending on geography—social liberalism in Europe, democratic commitment in East Asia/Arab nations, economic positioning in Latin America, and anti-elite sentiment in Africa—suggests that the structure and source of political disagreement are culturally and geographically contingent rather than universal. This challenges the assumption that a monolithic political divide exists globally. Furthermore, the observation that most variance occurs *within* countries suggests that internal societal structures determine conflict more than inter-state relations do. The focus shifts from measuring *how polarized* a society is to identifying *what* specific social or structural domains are contested within those societies. Future inquiry should explore how these cross-dimensional divisions interact with institutional structures and historical trajectories to understand the mechanisms generating these localized cleavages. What assumptions about universal political frameworks are we allowing to dictate our measurement of global conflict?

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

This text reads like an abstract or summary from empirical social science research, characterized by measured analysis and a focus on methodological limitations rather than declarative opinion.

Signals Detected

Sentence length variance and complex structuring suggest human academic writing.

The text flows logically from a problem statement (single axis limitation) to the proposed solution (multidimensional measurement) effectively.

The presentation of specific statistical findings (-0.015 correlation, 58-88% variance) and the explicit framing of the research gap appears grounded in specific data synthesis.

The technical terminology and structure align with peer-reviewed academic communication, suggesting an origin from research dissemination.

Human Indicators

Use of specific, nuanced statistical findings (-0.015 correlation, 58 to 88 percent variance) that are embedded within a theoretical argument.

The direct challenge to the existing methodology ('A single left-right axis does not describe political division in most of the world') demonstrates an analytical stance rather than simple reporting.