Skip to content
Chimera readability score 47 out of 100, College reading level.

Read more from John D. Wilsey in his new book, God and Country: Upholding Faith, history, and National Identity (B&H Academic, 2026).
The past is ever-present. You may not be interested in history, but history is interested in you.
That’s because none of us can escape the past. The events of the past are relevant to the present. Past causes produce present effects that compel the living to reckon with the legacies left by the dead. Someone may enjoy historical movies, documentaries, novels, or tourist sites but not see much relevance to the pressing events of the day. Whether or not we understand the past, appreciate it, and find it personally interesting, we cannot escape the perennial relevance of what is past.
Historian John Lukacs describes history as “the memory of mankind” and “the remembered past.” Acknowledging that all sentient animals have some sort of memory, Lukacs observes that only human persons intentionally remember their past. We tell stories, sing songs, write books, build statues, memorialize significant sites, bury our dead in cemeteries, and dedicate things to past people or events. We do these to make sense of what is past in our present.
This is especially significant for Christians, because our faith has been handed down to us from the past by the saints (Jude 3). Christianity is a faith rooted in history, so we Christians have a primary interest in the study of the past for both temporal and eternal purposes. It’s vitally important that we conduct our historical investigations with virtue.
History as Human Endeavor
Humans have a historical consciousness because we’re created by God in his image. He’s the Maker of time, and he gave us the ability to mark time—the past, the present, and the future. Not only did he give us a historical consciousness, but he placed the sun, the moon, and the stars in the sky to “be for signs and for seasons and for days and years” (Gen. 1:14). God made the great lights to be an immutable frame of reference for our marking the passage of time.
So to study the past for the purposes of the present and to base aspirations for the future is one of the most essentially human activities we do.
You may not be interested in history, but history is interested in you.
We study history to make sense of the past. To study history is to pursue truth. History doesn’t give us a God’s-eye perspective on the truth of the past, but it directs us to truth. Since history is the pursuit of truth, it’s a moral exercise. And for that reason, historical thinking requires virtue.
The apostle Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 13:6 (NASB), “[Love] does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth.” All the classical virtues find their perfect expressions in the theological virtue of love.
Virtues in History
The classical virtues are wisdom, justice, courage, and temperance. Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) writes, “As to virtue leading us to a happy life, I hold virtue to be nothing less than perfect love of God.”
He sees wisdom as love differentiating that which drives a person toward God and that which compels a person to abandon God. Justice is love that gives every person his or her due: God first, and others second. Courage is the bearing of all things for the love of God and for others. Temperance is the love for those things that God loves, resulting in a holy life and the enjoyment of the good, the true, and the beautiful.
It may sound strange to say we owe the dead our love. After all, they aren’t here to receive, or return, our love. We can’t know them in relationship, because they are no more.
How can we show love to the dead? We can tell the truth about them. We don’t idealize their lives and actions to deify them, nor do we emphasize their faults to demonize them. We bring their lives, actions, and intents into the light as best we can in the interest of representing them with truthfulness. We don’t rejoice in wrong, thus we neither worship them nor condemn them. We rejoice in the truth, so we pursue the truth as we seek to make sense of their lives’ contributions and legacies.
We get wisdom from the study of the past, but we must bring wisdom to our study if understanding is our goal. Thus, we humbly recognize our limitations as we approach the past. We acknowledge that the dead were once as we are now, and one day, we’ll be as they are.
We also remember that we cannot know the things they knew in their time from their perspective. We have our own perspective, which gives us the ability to see their lives from start to finish, but we can never see the moments in their lives from their perspectives. We exercise wisdom to know when and how to make sound judgments of a past life and how to refrain from self-righteous condemnation.
Measured Justice and Courage
Justice comes into our study of the past when we give the dead their due. We don’t treat them as good guys or bad guys and thus idealize or demonize them. We in the present have the duty to speak for the dead, because they aren’t here to speak for themselves. We represent them truthfully as best we can, given the available evidence. And for those who never had anyone to speak for them, we rise to tell their stories truthfully, as the evidence leads us.
We get wisdom from the study of the past, but we must bring wisdom to our study if understanding is our goal.
Peering into the events, lives, and ideas of the past can be unsettling, uncomfortable, and disturbing. Slavery, genocide, war, poverty, pestilence, and all kinds of suffering are to be found in every civilization at every time.
It takes courage to wade into the suffering of people across time, especially for someone who has an emotional, national, traditional, or familial connection to those who suffered or those who caused the suffering. Courage, according to Aristotle, is being afraid of the right things for the right reasons, and cowardice is fear of the wrong things for the wrong reasons. We should fear ignorance, self-righteousness, and short-sightedness more than we fear the passing sentiments of a transient zeitgeist.
Finally, temperance in historical thinking is found in the exercise of self-control. We control our passions when we engage the past, and we take the past on its own terms. We don’t seek to advance a political agenda by using the past to our advantage, because to do so is intemperate, indecorous, and contrary to the pursuit of truth.
Our times are marked by innumerable vices, all of which serve as obstacles to the attainment of truth. To be countercultural in the 21st century, think Christianly about the past. As you do so, you’ll treat the dead with charity and come to the past with virtue.
Free eBook by Rebecca McLaughlin: ‘Jesus Through the Eyes of Women’
If the women who followed Jesus could tell you what he was like, what would they say?
Jesus’s treatment of women was revolutionary. That’s why they flocked to him. Wherever he went, they sought him out. Women sat at his feet and tugged at his robes. They came to him for healing, for forgiveness, and for answers. So what did women see in this first-century Jewish rabbi and what can we learn as we look through their eyes today?
In Jesus Through the Eyes of Women, Rebecca McLaughlin explores the life-changing accounts of women who met the Lord. By entering the stories of the named and unnamed women in the Gospels, this book gives readers a unique lens to see Jesus as these women did and marvel at how he loved them in return.
We’re delighted to offer this ebook to you for free.

Facts Only

John D. Wilsey authored a book titled *God and Country: Upholding Faith, History, and National Identity*, published by B&H Academic in 2026.
Historian John Lukacs describes history as "the memory of mankind" and "the remembered past."
Christianity is presented as a faith rooted in history, with Jude 3 cited as a reference.
The article references Genesis 1:14, noting that God created celestial bodies for marking time.
Classical virtues—wisdom, justice, courage, and temperance—are linked to the theological virtue of love, as described by Augustine of Hippo.
1 Corinthians 13:6 is quoted to emphasize that love rejoices in truth, not unrighteousness.
The text argues that studying history requires virtue, including truthfulness and humility.
It suggests that historical thinking involves giving the dead their due without idealizing or demonizing them.
The article mentions that courage is needed to confront uncomfortable historical truths, such as slavery and genocide.
Temperance in historical study is described as avoiding political agendas and taking the past on its own terms.
A free eBook, *Jesus Through the Eyes of Women* by Rebecca McLaughlin, is offered to readers.
The eBook explores the experiences of women who interacted with Jesus in the Gospels.

Executive Summary

The article explores the enduring relevance of history, emphasizing that the past shapes the present and future. It argues that humans uniquely engage with history through memory, storytelling, and memorialization, distinguishing this from other animals. For Christians, history is particularly significant because their faith is rooted in historical events and traditions passed down through generations. The text highlights the moral and virtuous approach required to study history, drawing on classical virtues like wisdom, justice, courage, and temperance. It suggests that historical inquiry demands truthfulness, humility, and a balanced perspective—neither idealizing nor demonizing past figures. The piece also promotes a Christian perspective on history, advocating for love and truth in interpreting the past, and concludes with a promotional offer for a free eBook about Jesus through the eyes of women in the Gospels.
The discussion frames history as a moral endeavor, where virtues guide how we remember and represent the dead. It acknowledges the discomfort of confronting past suffering but encourages courage in facing historical truths. The text also critiques contemporary vices that hinder truth-seeking, positioning a Christian approach as a countercultural alternative. The inclusion of the eBook offer ties the historical and theological themes to a practical resource for readers.

Full Take

This piece presents history as an inescapable force shaping identity, particularly for Christians, and frames historical study as a moral act requiring virtue. The strongest version of its argument is that history is not just an academic exercise but a human endeavor demanding truth, humility, and love—especially in how we remember and represent the dead. It effectively ties classical virtues to Christian theology, using Augustine and Scripture to bolster its claims. However, the narrative leans heavily on a Christian worldview, which may limit its appeal to secular audiences. The call for "truthful" representation of historical figures is commendable, but the piece doesn’t address how competing interpretations of truth might complicate this ideal.
The pattern scan reveals a subtle appeal to authority (ARC-0012 Appeal to Authority) through citations of Augustine, Scripture, and historical figures, which could be seen as borrowing credibility to reinforce its claims. The promotional inclusion of the eBook at the end introduces a potential mission drift (ARC-0031 Mission Drift), as the transition from historical analysis to marketing feels abrupt. The root cause of this narrative is a Christian humanist paradigm that views history as a moral teacher, assuming that virtue and truth are objectively discernible. This echoes historical patterns of religiously framed historiography, where faith and reason are intertwined to justify a particular worldview.
The implications for human agency are significant: if history is a moral endeavor, then individuals bear responsibility for how they engage with the past. The beneficiaries are those who seek a virtuous, truth-oriented approach to history, while the costs may include exclusion of non-Christian perspectives or oversimplification of complex historical debates. Second-order consequences could include a polarization between those who see history as a moral duty and those who view it as a neutral academic discipline.
Bridge questions: How might non-Christian historians engage with the virtues outlined here without the theological framework? What historical figures or events might challenge the idea of a single "truthful" representation? Would the author’s approach to history change if applied to figures or events outside the Christian tradition?
Counterstrike scan: If this were part of a coordinated campaign, the playbook would likely involve framing history as a moral battleground to rally a Christian audience around a specific worldview, using authoritative sources to lend credibility. The actual content aligns with this pattern but stops short of overt manipulation, focusing instead on constructive engagement with history. No concerning alignment detected.

What We Owe the Dead: The Role of Virtue in History — Arc Codex