(London) – Bangladeshi authorities should immediately take steps to end the prolonged pretrial detention of politicians and others linked to the deposed Awami League government, Human Rights Watch said today. Police detained thousands of party officials, activists, and supporters after Sheikh Hasina was forced to step down as prime minister in August 2024 following weeks of protests, and hundreds remain in prison without being charged with any crime.
Though some officials may have been complicit in the Hasina government’s serious rights violations, many were arrested without apparent evidence on allegations of murdering protesters. Their family members and lawyers allege that the detainees, many of them older people, some with serious health conditions, have been denied basic rights including bail and medical care. At least 10 Awami League office holders, most of whom were not charged with any crime, have died in prison since Prime Minister Tarique Rahman took office in February 2026.
“Under one government after another, hundreds of opposition members have been locked up without evidence or due process,” said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman has pledged reform, and as a first step he should end the prolonged arbitrary detention of political opponents.”
Instead of pursuing reforms, the government’s new National Human Rights Commission bill—if adopted in its current form—would prevent the new commission from investigating alleged arbitrary arrests. Those detained without charge include former Awami League members of parliament, other former lawmakers that supported Hasina’s administration, and activists, officials, and journalists who had backed the Awami League government. Others, including members of the security forces, are accused of serious international crimes including extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances. Some are also accused of corruption.
Prosecutors have repeatedly sought to deny bail in cases in which no evidence has been produced. The lower magistrate and district courts have consistently refused bail, and High Court bail orders have been circumvented as government authorities file fresh cases.
In one example, ABM Khairul Haque, 82, a former chief justice, was arrested on July 24, 2025, for allegedly murdering a protester. Over the following three months, he was arrested in four more cases, including for corruption. The lower courts denied bail in each of these, though his family told Human Rights Watch he was in poor health and had a heart attack while in prison. The High Court granted the bail applications, but on March 10, 2026, the day before the court granted bail in the final case, the police applied for him to be arrested in two new cases, preventing his release.
The lower courts refused bail in both of these new cases, and the High Court on May 12 granted him bail. But before Haque could be released, police filed another murder charge. They alleged he was at a murder scene at exactly the same time as an earlier murder alleged against him, though the two locations are over 10 kilometers apart.
The process was repeated once again, with the High Court granting bail and the police, for the third time, filing a further case, with the authorities this time seeking to evade a new High Court bail ruling requiring the police not to “arrest and harass” Haque “unless there is a specific case against him.” He was finally released on August 19 after intervention by the Appellate Division. Throughout this period, he was not charged with any offense.
Lawyers for other detainees told Human Rights Watch that they now advise their clients not to seek bail, as if they succeed the police simply file a new case against them.
Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal, a domestic court to prosecute international crimes, allows detention without charge beyond one year only in “exceptional circumstances” that are set out in writing. The tribunal has not released on bail any of the over 160 people it has detained, who have no right to appeal bail rejections.
Dr. Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, 81, a former Hasina advisor, was first detained by the tribunal in October 2024 and has now spent 22 months in custody without charge. When he sought bail in April 2026, the tribunal neither allowed bail nor set out any “exceptional circumstances.” It instead adjourned proceedings twice, most recently until the end of August.
A former parliament member, Kamal Ahmed Majumder, 75, has also been detained by the tribunal for 22 months. In jail, his family told Human Rights Watch, he suffered gangrene on his foot requiring amputation of three toes and broke his hip when he fell. The tribunal refused bail in July.
Many families say that their detained relatives are not receiving adequate medical care. Activists have called for the release of Shahriar Kabir, 75, who suffers chronic ailments and needs a wheelchair. RAM Obaidul Muktadir Chowdhury, 71, has been in detention for 22 months without charge and has serious heart problems.
Ramesh Chandra Sen, 85, a former Awami League lawmaker, who was arrested in August 2024 for three cases of murder and an explosives case, remained in detention until his death on February 7, 2026. His family said he was denied proper medication and refused bail. Similar concerns relate to the death of SM Ziaul Haque Zia, 65, a Jamalpur district Awami League member who was already in poor health when he was detained on January 6. He died on April 14, after he was denied bail.
International human rights law permits some use of pretrial incarceration or release with conditions. However, such detention should be the exception, not the rule, and should be determined on an individual basis. A judge or equivalent should review the detention of every detained person to consider the legality and necessity of their detention, and anyone so detained is entitled to a speedy trial or release. Any pretrial restrictions must be consistent with the right to liberty, the presumption of innocence, and the right to equality.
“A justice system that lets older people die in custody before they are ever charged is not treating pretrial detention as the exceptional measure it always should be,” Pearson said. “The Bangladeshi government should order independent inquiries into all prison deaths under its watch and stop arbitrarily detaining people for prolonged periods without charge.”
Facts Only
* Police detained thousands of party officials, activists, and supporters after Sheikh Hasina stepped down as prime minister in August 2024.
* Hundreds remain in prison without being charged with any crime.
* At least 10 Awami League office holders have died in prison since Prime Minister Tarique Rahman took office in February 2026.
* Some officials were arrested without apparent evidence regarding allegations of murdering protesters.
* Detainees, including some older people with health conditions, have allegedly been denied bail and medical care.
* Former Awami League members of parliament, former lawmakers supporting Hasina's administration, activists, officials, and journalists have been detained.
* Some detainees, including members of the security forces, are accused of serious international crimes like extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances, as well as corruption.
* ABM Khairul Haque was arrested on July 24, 2025, for allegedly murdering a protester and subsequently in four more cases including corruption charges over three months.
* The High Court granted bail for ABM Khairul Haque, but police filed subsequent murder charges against him, leading to repeated legal proceedings before his release on August 19.
* The International Crimes Tribunal allows detention without charge beyond one year only in "exceptional circumstances."
* Dr. Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, a former Hasina advisor, has spent 22 months in custody without charge since October 2024.
* Kamal Ahmed Majumder, a former parliament member, has been detained by the tribunal for 22 months.
Executive Summary
Bangladeshi authorities are urged to end the prolonged pretrial detention of politicians and others associated with the deposed Awami League government, as reported by Human Rights Watch. Police detained thousands of party officials, activists, and supporters following Sheikh Hasina's resignation as prime minister in August 2024, with hundreds remaining imprisoned without charges. Allegations exist that many detainees, including older individuals with health issues, have been denied basic rights like bail and medical care. Furthermore, at least ten Awami League office holders have died in prison since Prime Minister Tarique Rahman took office in February 2026.
The situation involves ongoing legal challenges where prosecutors have sought to deny bail without producing evidence, with lower courts and High Courts refusing bail, and subsequent arrests filed by authorities often circumventing these orders. Specific cases, such as that of ABM Khairul Haque, illustrate this dynamic, involving repeated attempts by police to file new charges against detainees, even when prior bail was granted. Detainees and their families report inadequate medical care. International human rights law suggests pretrial detention should be the exception, not the rule, requiring individual review of legality and necessity, and ensuring access to speedy trials or release consistent with liberty and innocence.
Full Take
The narrative reveals a systemic friction between state power, legal procedures, and fundamental human rights within Bangladesh. The repeated pattern of detention without charge—especially against political opponents and activists—establishes a context where the presumption of innocence is functionally suspended, particularly for those linked to a deposed administration. The procedural maneuvers described in the case of ABM Khairul Haque, where bail is granted only to be immediately followed by new arrests, suggest that the legal system functions less as an impartial adjudicator and more as a mechanism for sustained control and attrition against dissent. This structure shifts the burden of proof onto the accused while simultaneously using procedural delays (like protracted court battles) as a means of extended incarceration, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations who lack resources to navigate complex legal defenses or access necessary medical support. The contradiction between international standards permitting conditional detention and the reality of prolonged, uncharged imprisonment highlights a gap in accountability mechanisms, particularly concerning prison mortality and access to justice for political detainees. The pattern suggests that while high-level political rhetoric may signal reform, the operational enforcement prioritizes the maintenance of existing power structures over judicial independence and individual liberty.
Pattern detected: ARC-0018 Injustice Narrative, ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey, ARC-0024 Ambiguity, ARC-0061 Systemic.
Sentinel — Human
The text reads like a well-researched journalistic report that effectively synthesizes legal arguments with detailed, personalized accounts to build a case against prolonged detention practices.
