Starmer accused of 'weaponising' antisemitic attack to target pro-Palestine protests
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been criticised for linking pro-Palestine marches to antisemitic violence after saying that "if you stand alongside people who say 'globalise the intifada', you are calling for terrorism against Jews and people who use that phrase should be prosecuted".
The prime minister made the comments in an address to the nation following the stabbing of two Jewish men, aged 34 and 76, in Golders Green, a neighbourhood of northwest London with a large Jewish population.
A 45-year-old Somali-born British national was arrested on Wednesday afternoon after the attack. He had left a psychiatric hospital just days before the attack, Channel 4 reported on Thursday.
On Friday, London's Metropolitan Police announced that Essa Suleiman had been charged not with terrorism offences, but with two counts of attempted murder and one count of possession of a bladed article in a public place.
Suleiman is also accused, according to the BBC, of attempting to murder Ishmail Hussein, whom he had known for about 20 years, on the morning of the Golders Green attack.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
There have been no recorded incidents in the UK of an antisemitic attack involving the phrase "globalise the intifada". However, in December, the Metropolitan and Greater Manchester police forces announced they would arrest people for chanting "globalise the intifada" or holding placards displaying the phrase.
In January, three pro-Palestine protesters were charged for allegedly chanting "intifada" at a demonstration.
On Friday, it emerged that the Met is reviewing implementing a possible ban on upcoming pro-Palestine marches.
The Stop the War Coalition is planning a demonstration in London on 16 May to mark Nakba Day, which commemorates the forcible displacement of more than 750,000 Palestinians from their homes in 1948.
Meanwhile, Green Party leader Zack Polanski has accused the government of "using the pain of the Jewish community to restrict our right to peaceful protest".
Polanski said on Thursday afternoon: "I am the only Jewish leader of a major political party, and I suffer antisemitic abuse every single day. For other politicians to use antisemitism as a political football, especially after these appalling attacks, is utterly appalling and should be beneath them.
"We must also be clear that any response to these abhorrent attacks that curtail our civil liberties would be wrong."
Surge in antisemitic attacks
Starmer said on Thursday evening: "Antisemitism is an old, old hatred. History shows that the roots are deep, and if you turn away, it grows back. Yet far too many people in this country diminish it.
"They either don’t see it or they don’t want to see it. Take the marches that happen regularly across Britain.
"Of course, we protect freedom of speech and peaceful protests in this country. But if you are marching with people wearing pictures of paragliders without calling it out, you are venerating the murder of Jews."
Three women were found guilty of a terror offence in February 2024 for having displayed images of paragliders on their clothes in a march on 14 October 2023, shortly after the 7 October Hamas attack on Israel.
It has not been common for attendees of pro-Palestine marches to display images of paragliders.
On Thursday evening, Starmer called on "everyone decent in this country to open their eyes to Jewish pain, Jewish suffering and Jewish fear".
There has been a large surge in antisemitic attacks in recent months, including numerous arson attacks and incidents investigated by the Met as antisemitic hate crimes in the past month.
In 2020, Suleiman was referred to the Prevent counter-extremism programme.
Calls for ban on pro-Palestine marches
An obscure group that first appeared online on 9 March, Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia (Hayi), claimed responsibility for the attack on Wednesday afternoon.
The claim has not been verified or substantiated. No details have emerged to suggest how a middle-aged British-Somali man who had been in a psychiatric hospital could have taken instruction from such a group.
Hayi has claimed responsibility for numerous attacks across Europe in the past two months.
The Israeli government has said the group is linked to Iran, but British police have not established any such connection, although they are understood to be investigating its possibility.
Activist groups have criticised attempts to link pro-Palestine protests to antisemitic attacks.
Pro-Palestine activists have strongly denied that "globalise the Intifada" is antisemitic or a call for violence, and British Jews have been prominent in pro-Palestine marches in the UK.
Intifada comes from the Arabic root word nafada, which means "to shake off" or "to rise up", and translates to "uprising".
On Thursday, the UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall, called for a "moratorium" on pro-Palestine marches because of recent antisemitic attacks.
Hall said on Times Radio: "It pains me to say this, but I think we may have reached a point where we need to have a moratorium on the sorts of marches that have been happening.
"It’s clearly impossible at the moment for any of these pro-Palestine marches not to incubate within them some sort of antisemitic or demonising language."
In response, the Stop the War coalition criticised Hall's remarks as "unacceptable".
The coalition said: "We condemn unequivocally these attacks, as we do all forms of antisemitism and racism. No one should be attacked for their race or religion.
"However, the attempts by Hall, sections of the media and some politicians to connect such attacks with the Palestine marches are wrong."
Stop the War added: "These marches are supported by many Jewish people who attend. They are not the ‘hate marches’ described by right-wing politicians but expressions of solidarity and support for those under attack."
The left-wing outfit Your Party, led by Jeremy Corbyn, said: "Politicians are weaponising the abhorrent stabbings to take away our civil liberties and baselessly attack the Palestine movement."
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.
Facts Only
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer linked pro-Palestine marches to antisemitic violence in a national address.
Two Jewish men, aged 34 and 76, were stabbed in Golders Green, London.
Essa Suleiman, a 45-year-old Somali-born British national, was arrested and charged with two counts of attempted murder and possession of a bladed article.
Suleiman had been discharged from a psychiatric hospital days before the attack.
The Metropolitan Police are reviewing a possible ban on upcoming pro-Palestine marches.
The Stop the War Coalition is planning a demonstration on 16 May for Nakba Day.
Green Party leader Zack Polanski accused the government of using antisemitism to restrict protest rights.
Starmer stated that chanting "globalise the intifada" should be prosecuted, though no UK antisemitic attacks have involved this phrase.
Three pro-Palestine protesters were charged in January for allegedly chanting "intifada" at a demonstration.
The UK’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall, called for a moratorium on pro-Palestine marches.
An obscure group, Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia (Hayi), claimed responsibility for the attack, but no evidence supports this claim.
British police are investigating potential links between the suspect and extremist groups, though none have been confirmed.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative here hinges on the tension between free speech and security, with Starmer’s framing of pro-Palestine protests as incubators of antisemitism serving as a focal point. The strongest version of this argument is that public safety justifies preemptive restrictions on speech perceived as inciting violence, especially given the surge in antisemitic attacks. However, the pattern scan reveals potential distortions: the phrase "globalise the intifada" is being weaponized as a proxy for broader protest suppression, despite no direct link to violence. This aligns with **ARC-0024 Ambiguity**—using a loaded term to conflate political dissent with terrorism—and **ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey**, where the "motte" (condemning antisemitism) is used to defend the "bailey" (restricting protests).
The root cause appears to be a paradigm where security concerns are leveraged to curtail civil liberties, echoing historical patterns of state overreach during periods of social unrest. The implications are significant: if protests are banned based on perceived associations rather than direct evidence, it sets a precedent for eroding democratic freedoms. Who benefits? Politicians seeking to appear tough on extremism; who bears the cost? Activists and marginalized communities whose voices are silenced.
Bridge questions: What evidence would justify banning protests, and who gets to define "incitement"? How do we distinguish between legitimate security concerns and political opportunism? If the suspect’s mental health history is relevant, why is the focus on protest rhetoric rather than systemic failures in care?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign would amplify fear of protests while downplaying contextual factors (e.g., the suspect’s psychiatric history). The actual content partially matches this—Starmer’s rhetoric escalates the threat level without proportional evidence—but stops short of outright fabrication. The pattern is concerning but not definitive.
Sentinel — Human
This text functions as a complex news analysis that integrates specific legal facts with highly charged political commentary, exhibiting characteristics of human-led editorial synthesis.