A U.S. military investigation determined in its preliminary findings that the United States conducted an attack on an Iranian elementary school that killed at least 175 people, most of them children, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the ongoing inquiry. The findings directly contradict assertions by President Donald Trump that Iran struck the school.
The lethal strike on the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school building was the result of a “targeting error” by the U.S. military, which mistook the facility for part of an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps navy base that was adjacent to the school, according to one of the U.S. officials who spoke to The Intercept on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.
U.S. Central Command attacked the school based on long outdated coordinates for the strike provided by another defense agency, one of the officials told The Intercept. While the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school was once connected to the IRGC base by roads, the building was partitioned off by 2016, according to an investigation by New Lines Magazine.
The attack, which came after a yearlong effort by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to gut programs to reduce civilian casualties, killed more civilians than any other strike in Trump’s second Iran war. It was “colossal negligence,” one of the current government officials said.
Trump has repeatedly claimed that Iran was responsible for the strike, despite mounting evidence to the contrary. “In my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran,” Trump told reporters March 7. “They have no accuracy whatsoever. It was done by Iran.”
Wes Bryant — who served until last year as the senior analyst and adviser on precision warfare, targeting, and civilian harm mitigation at the Pentagon’s Civilian Protection Center of Excellence — called the attack on the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school a “failure in fundamental targeting doctrine and standards.”
Bryant, who called in thousands of strikes across the greater Middle East as a Special Operations joint terminal attack controller, said it was common to rely on outdated imagery while conducting operations.
“As a targeter, the imagery and initial intelligence data you receive on a potential target or target set is just the start. You don’t prosecute based solely off any organization — NGA or otherwise — giving you an image and saying they have intelligence that it’s an enemy location,” he told The Intercept, referring to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which specializes in such imagery. “You corroborate with other intelligence, and you conduct as near real time as possible characterization of that target as well as the civilian presence and risk to include collateral damage analysis risk of civilian casualties.”
U.S. Central Command refused to comment on the preliminary findings of the inquiry. “It would be inappropriate to comment given the incident is under investigation,” a CENTCOM official told The Intercept by email.
The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency did not immediately reply to requests for comment on their potential involvement in providing intelligence that led to the strike.
The investigation’s findings were widely expected as evidence of a U.S. attack on the school mounted. A video released on Sunday by Iran’s semiofficial Mehr News Agency showed a cruise missile striking the IRGC naval base beside the elementary school as smoke appears to billow from the school itself, indicating that it had recently been struck. According to Bellingcat, the cruise missile was a Tomahawk missile. The U.S. is the only party to the conflict employing Tomahawk missiles.
“America, regardless of what so-called international institutions say, is unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history,” Hegseth said at a March 2 press conference. “No stupid rules of engagement.”
CENTCOM would not offer an estimated civilian death toll for the U.S. war on Iran. More than 1,300 Iranian civilians have been killed, according to the Iranian Red Crescent Society.
An investigation by Airwars, a U.K.-based airstrike monitoring group, found that the first days of the Iran war saw far more sites targeted than any recent U.S. or Israeli military campaign. “While the rate of civilian harm cannot be solely predicted by the number of targets hit, initial indications suggest it has been high — particularly with U.S. targets correlating with heavily populated areas,” according to the Airwars report. “The targets map heavily onto the highest populated areas.”
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
The Intercept Briefing
Trump’s AI-Powered World Wars
Nick Turse and Hooman Majd discuss war on Iran and other U.S. conflicts, and Sam Biddle breaks down how AI is being used.
Voices
It’s a War With Iran, Not an “Intervention”
Elected officials desperately want to cast our war with Iran as an “intervention” or “operation.” Don’t let them get away with it.
With World's Eyes on Iran, Israel Locks Down the West Bank
The Israeli military has closed checkpoints around the West Bank, restricting Palestinians’ movement as settler violence ramps up.
Facts Only
A U.S. military investigation found that a U.S. attack mistakenly struck an Iranian elementary school, killing at least 175 people, mostly children.
The strike was intended for an adjacent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval base.
The error resulted from outdated coordinates provided by another defense agency.
The Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school was once connected to the IRGC base but was partitioned off by 2016.
The attack occurred after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth reduced programs aimed at minimizing civilian casualties.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed Iran was responsible for the strike.
A video released by Iran’s Mehr News Agency showed a cruise missile, identified as a U.S. Tomahawk, striking the IRGC base near the school.
Over 1,300 Iranian civilians have been killed in the U.S. war on Iran, according to the Iranian Red Crescent Society.
The U.S. Central Command and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency have not commented on the investigation.
The article describes a broader political context, including Trump’s authoritarian actions and erosion of press freedom.
The Intercept calls for public support to expand independent journalism.
Executive Summary
A U.S. military investigation has preliminarily concluded that a U.S. strike mistakenly hit an Iranian elementary school, killing at least 175 people, mostly children. The attack was intended for an adjacent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval base but relied on outdated coordinates, leading to a "targeting error." The incident occurred amid a broader U.S. military campaign in Iran, which has resulted in over 1,300 civilian deaths, according to the Iranian Red Crescent Society. President Donald Trump has repeatedly blamed Iran for the strike, contradicting the investigation's findings. The attack has been described as a "failure in fundamental targeting doctrine" by a former Pentagon analyst, highlighting systemic issues in U.S. military intelligence and civilian harm mitigation. The investigation remains ongoing, with U.S. Central Command declining to comment. The strike has drawn scrutiny for its high civilian toll and the use of outdated intelligence, raising questions about military accountability and the conduct of the war.
The article also contextualizes the incident within a broader political landscape, describing an authoritarian shift under Trump, including the erosion of press freedom and the consolidation of power within loyalist circles. The Intercept frames this as part of a larger assault on democratic norms, with corporate media complicity and the weaponization of information by right-wing billionaires. The piece concludes with a call for independent journalism to counter these trends, emphasizing the need for public support to sustain investigative reporting.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative presents a damning indictment of U.S. military negligence and systemic failures in targeting protocols, compounded by political leadership that denies responsibility. The investigation’s findings—backed by video evidence and expert testimony—undermine Trump’s claims, framing the strike as a catastrophic error rather than an Iranian attack. The piece also situates this within a broader pattern of authoritarian overreach, where institutional checks are dismantled, and media independence is under siege. This dual focus on military accountability and democratic backsliding gives the narrative weight, appealing to both moral outrage and civic concern.
However, the article’s framing leans heavily on emotional exploitation (ARC-0012) and moral panic (ARC-0021), particularly in its latter sections. The shift from reporting the strike to a broader critique of Trump’s administration risks conflating distinct issues—military misconduct and political authoritarianism—without sufficient connective tissue. The call for reader support, while understandable for an independent outlet, could be perceived as an appeal to popularity (ARC-0003) if not carefully contextualized. The piece also omits countervailing perspectives, such as potential Iranian disinformation or the complexities of wartime intelligence, which could weaken its credibility for skeptical readers.
Root causes here include the erosion of institutional safeguards—both in military targeting and democratic governance—and the weaponization of information to serve political narratives. The implications are profound: civilian lives are treated as collateral in a war where accountability is absent, and truth becomes a casualty of partisan warfare. Second-order consequences may include further polarization, diminished trust in institutions, and a normalization of authoritarian tactics.
Bridge questions: What evidence would change your assessment of responsibility for the strike? How might the U.S. military’s targeting protocols be reformed to prevent such errors? What role should independent journalism play in holding power to account during wartime?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign would amplify the strike’s civilian toll while suppressing context (e.g., Iranian military proximity to schools) and framing it as deliberate U.S. malice. It would also exploit the authoritarian narrative to stoke fear and urgency, urging financial support under the guise of "saving democracy." This article aligns partially with that playbook—particularly in its emotional framing—but stops short of outright manipulation by grounding claims in verifiable evidence and expert testimony. The call for support, while self-interested, does not rise to the level of predatory rhetoric.
Patterns detected: ARC-0012 Emotional Exploitation, ARC-0021 Moral Panic, ARC-0003 Appeal to Popularity
Sentinel — Human
The article exhibits strong human characteristics, including a clear editorial voice, varied stylistic choices, and specific sourcing, with minimal indicators of synthetic generation.