A 50 percent tariff has disrupted dairy exports, leaving Canadian farmers with milk that cannot be redirected overnight.
Abbotsford, British Columbia – Every second day, 28,000 litres of raw milk leave Casey Pruim’s farm in Abbotsford in western Canada, entering a distribution system built on the assumption that the milk and the products made from it will have somewhere to go.
While most is consumed in Canada, some had been sold across the border to the United States.
Those sales have largely come to a standstill since US President Donald Trump’s 50 percent tariff on $20bn in Canadian goods, including dairy products, came into effect on August 22.
Pruim, who is also chair of the British Columbia Dairy Association representing about 400 dairy farmers across the province, told Al Jazeera that Canadian farmers do not individually decide which products are exported.
Instead, producers such as Pruim – whose farm has 330 cows milked three times a day – sell into the provincial milk-marketing system, which distributes milk to processors according to demand, including for products exported to the US.
If a processor loses US demand, it may require less milk, with the impact then spread across the provincial pool.
Dylan Kruger, director of public affairs at BC Dairy, told Al Jazeera “there is still considerable uncertainty around the impact of the US tariffs”.
He said it was too early to know how the industry would be impacted or whether milk no longer sold to the US could be sold elsewhere, mitigating financial losses.
But the tariffs and wider trade tensions have already introduced uncertainty and instability for businesses.
“If the processor who’s exporting some of his product to the United States can no longer sell into that market because he’s now priced out of the market with a 50 percent tariff, that’s how it would impact the dairy farm,” Pruim said.
Pruim said if processor demand is squeezed, farmers would be forced to dump the milk. In the worst-case scenario, the herd has to be cut.
“Cows aren’t like a tap; you can’t just turn them on or off,” he said.
His warning captures dairy’s particular vulnerability in a tariff war: Milk is highly perishable, collected on a tight schedule and dependent on processors whose demand can change much faster than farmers can adjust production.
“These tariffs are completely unwarranted,” David Wiens, president of the Dairy Farmers of Canada, told Canada’s CBC News, adding that they would affect “the supply chain, not only in Canada but in the US as well”.
Supply-management system
Dairy trade between Canada and the US has largely operated under a free trade agreement between the US, Mexico and Canada, known as CUSMA in Canada.
Canada manages the supply of dairy, poultry and eggs through a national agricultural policy known as supply management. The system uses production quotas and import controls, including tariffs, to provide farmers with more stable and predictable prices while maintaining domestic supply.
Critics describe the system as protectionist and as a government-backed cartel.
Washington argues that Canada’s supply-management system restricts US dairy exports. Trump posted on Truth Social that “Canada had been ripping off the United States of America for years” and accused it of imposing “ridiculously high tariffs” that made life impossible for US farmers.
Canadian producers reject that argument, saying the existing trade agreement already gives US imports substantial tariff-free access that is not fully utilised.
Canada’s dairy trade deficit with the US has grown significantly since CUSMA came into force on July 1, 2020, according to the Dairy Processors Association of Canada.
In 2020, Canada exported 241.3 million Canadian dollars ($173m) in dairy products to the US and imported 647.4 million Canadian dollars ($462.7m) worth of dairy and dairy products. In 2025, Canadian dairy exports had risen to 308.7 million Canadian dollars ($220.7m) while dairy imports from the US had more than doubled to 1.355 billion Canadian dollars ($968.5m), accounting for 13.8 percent of total value of US dairy exports, according to the association.
Bryan Yu, chief economist at Central 1 credit union, said the immediate shock of losing a major market could be difficult for Canadian producers to absorb because replacement buyers cannot be found quickly.
“There is going to be pain in the near term for a lot of our producers,” Yu told Al Jazeera.
“You really can’t quickly adjust to a 50 percent tariff, because it’s uncharted waters for a lot of industries … and ultimately it shuts [Canadian producers] out, because a lot of them don’t have the margins that they can play with,” he said.
Yu said Canadian consumers might absorb some of the additional supply while exporters search for new markets and higher-value products, but neither adjustment is instantaneous.
“There are global markets as well, especially when you talk about chilled, chilled beef, chilled products and really it’s a question of whether … other types of markets that could be available.”
Canada has also imposed retaliatory tariffs, which came into effect on September 8 and cover $20bn worth of US products.
Dairy products are among the targeted goods. The list includes a 50 percent tariff on milk, cream and whey products and a 25 percent tariff on many cheeses imported from the US.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has framed Ottawa’s response as both retaliation and an attempt to build greater economic resilience.
Announcing the collapse of the latest negotiations, he said Canada would match Washington’s new tariffs “dollar for dollar” to protect workers, farmers, families and businesses.
But retaliatory measures carry risks of their own.
“Canada’s new retaliatory tariffs will help some industries but hurt most and weaken economic growth across the country by raising costs for producers and consumers,” Oxford Economics said in a report.
For now, geography remains important for perishable goods like dairy products that once moved quickly across the US border and cannot be redirected overnight to a distant market without new buyers, logistics and regulatory approvals.
Ottawa’s Trade Commissioner Service is advising affected companies to check their CUSMA compliance, explore available relief and contact trade commissioners about potential new markets.
Yu predicted that the US and Canada could reach a tariff deal in the following months but said the interim period could bring “higher prices, weaker economic activity and deeper mistrust”.
For Pruim, the uncertainty is as destabilising as the tariff threat itself.
“I think, like [for] any Canadian, it’s disappointing to have these trade talks collapse again and just the uncertainty around it.”
Facts Only
* US President Donald Trump implemented a 50 percent tariff on $20bn of Canadian goods, including dairy, on August 22.
* Canada implemented retaliatory tariffs on $20bn of US products on September 8, including 50 percent on milk, cream, and whey, and 25 percent on many cheeses.
* Canadian dairy is managed via a supply-management system using production quotas and import controls.
* Canadian dairy exports to the US rose from 241.3 million CAD in 2020 to 308.7 million CAD in 2025.
* US dairy imports into Canada rose from 647.4 million CAD in 2020 to 1.355 billion CAD in 2025.
* Casey Pruim operates a farm in Abbotsford, British Columbia, with 330 cows.
* David Wiens is president of the Dairy Farmers of Canada.
* Mark Carney is the Prime Minister of Canada.
* The CUSMA trade agreement governs dairy trade between the US, Mexico, and Canada.
* Ottawa's Trade Commissioner Service is advising companies to check CUSMA compliance and seek new markets.
Executive Summary
A trade conflict has emerged between the United States and Canada following the imposition of 50 percent tariffs on billions of dollars in goods, specifically impacting the dairy sector. The US administration argues that Canada's supply-management system is protectionist and restricts US exports. In response, Canada has implemented "dollar-for-dollar" retaliatory tariffs on US dairy and other products to protect domestic workers and farmers.
The immediate impact falls on Canadian producers who sell into a provincial marketing system. Because milk is highly perishable and production cannot be instantly adjusted, processors facing lost US demand may reduce their intake, potentially forcing farmers to dump milk or reduce herd sizes. While some suggest that domestic consumers or alternative global markets could absorb the surplus, these transitions are not instantaneous. Economic analysts indicate significant near-term pain for producers due to tight margins and the inability to quickly find replacement buyers. There remains considerable uncertainty regarding whether a diplomatic resolution will be reached in the coming months or if the period of instability will persist.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative is a cautionary tale of interdependence: a highly specialized, rigid production system (Canadian supply management) colliding with volatile geopolitical leverage. It highlights the physical reality of agriculture—where "cows aren't like a tap"—against the abstract speed of trade policy.
This situation is a textbook example of the friction between national sovereignty (protectionism) and globalized supply chains. The core tension lies in the definition of "fair trade." The US views Canada's supply management as a cartel; Canada views its current CUSMA concessions as more than sufficient. This is a clash of economic paradigms, not just a dispute over percentages.
The root cause is the weaponization of market access to force systemic policy changes. By targeting perishable goods, the aggressor applies maximum pressure on the most vulnerable link in the chain—the farmer—to create domestic political pressure on the government. The second-order consequence is a degradation of trust that extends beyond dairy, potentially impacting long-term economic growth and increasing costs for consumers in both nations.
Patterns detected: none
If this were a coordinated influence campaign, the playbook would involve amplifying the imagery of "dumping milk" to trigger a populist rural uprising against the current administration. The actual content avoids this by balancing the farmers' plight with macroeconomic data and official government responses.
Bridge Questions:
1. To what extent does a supply-management system create a "fragility" that makes a nation more susceptible to trade warfare?
2. If retaliatory tariffs raise costs for domestic consumers, at what point does the cost of "standing firm" exceed the benefit of protecting the industry?
3. What alternative mechanisms exist for resolving trade disputes that do not involve the immediate disruption of perishable food supplies?
