Skip to content
Chimera readability score 0.5646 out of 100, reading level.

Since the start of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, Telegram has seen the rise of Russian-language channels specializing in graphic footage from the front, including combat killings, executions of prisoners, and the desecration of corpses. The independent outlet iStories examined more than 50 of these channels and identified the individuals behind some of them. They determined that these channels are run mostly not by soldiers, but by civilians — often teenagers. Meduza shares the investigation’s main findings.
The largest “snuff channel” examined by iStories, ”*** Mogilnik” (journalists withheld the channels’ full names to avoid promoting them), has been active for more than three years and has over 100,000 subscribers. It posts both original material and content shared from other channels. Reporters found that its monetization was handled by teenagers whose contact details were listed for advertising inquiries.
One of them is Denis Bogolyubov from the village of Korkatovo in Russia’s Mari El Republic. He began selling ads for the channel in the summer of 2023, when he was 16.
Meduza has condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine from the very start, and we are committed to reporting objectively on a war we firmly oppose. Join Meduza in its mission to challenge the Kremlin’s censorship with the truth. Donate today.
Another ad manager, Artyom Prigodin, was 15 when he started working for “Mogilnik” in 2023. He is from the Arkhangelsk region and was also listed as an administrator or ad manager for two other snuff channels. He stopped working with Telegram ads only after being conscripted into the army.
Prigodin confirmed to iStories that he had worked for “Mogilnik,” but said he later “had a falling out with the owner and quit.” According to him, the channel’s owner is not a soldier, though he had only ever seen him “through a camera.” Prigodin says he does not plan to sign an army service contract after completing his mandatory service, calling it “a one-way ticket.”
Another channel highlighted by iStories, “Video *** 18+,” has around 40,000 subscribers. Its founder is 36-year-old Vladimir Grebennikov, a worker at a Volgograd aluminum plant. The channel posts around 30 ads per week and, by journalists’ estimates, brings in roughly 200,000 rubles (about $2,400) a month.
Grebennikov told iStories he has “been interested in war his whole life.” His father is a veteran of the Soviet war in Afghanistan, and he said he had watched videos of killings and corpses long before starting the channel. In early 2026, he sold it, saying he had “burnt out.” The channel description now lists accounts belonging to two 20-year-olds: Timur Nikityuk from Ukraine’s Luhansk region and Andrey Savenkov from Russia’s Belgorod.
Grebennikov said he saw nothing wrong with publishing such material. “This is our life — people are fighting there, dying. Someone’s sisters, brothers, husbands, and so on,” he told iStories.
Sign up for Meduza’s daily newsletter
A digest of Russia’s investigative reports and news analysis. If it matters, we summarize it.
Do you think people shouldn’t know what it was like for them there, how they died? Many people live here and don’t even know a war is going on — figuratively speaking, they don’t give a damn. But others have been living in trenches for years. Do you think this shouldn’t interest people? Or that it should be shameful to post or watch it?
iStories also reported on the creator of the channel “Funny Corpses ***,” which until recently had more than 8,000 subscribers. Telegram suspended it in 2025, but the owner recreated it; it now has around 800 subscribers. In recent weeks, it has posted a photo of a Ukrainian soldier’s head impaled on a stick, a video of a Russian soldier urinating on a corpse, and an image of a person with bound hands and a crushed skull.
The channel’s founder is 18-year-old Artyom Filippov from Kaluga. Judging by his VKontakte page, he’s a proponent of neo-Nazi views. He created the channel at 15, and its administrators include four teenagers no older than 15.
Filippov says he started the channel in response to similar Ukrainian channels, calling it part of an “information war.”
I was just online, arguing with some Ukrainian guy — I don’t even remember what about anymore. He started sending photos of our dead soldiers, and I decided to find a channel with the same kind of content about Ukrainians. At that point, there were hardly any. So I decided to start my own.
iStories also identified a network of four channels with a combined audience of 115,000 subscribers, all run by 24-year-old Robert Khaibullin from Magnitogorsk. He claimed he only handled advertising and “didn’t even know what they were about,” adding that he has since “left this field.”
According to iStories, the main sources of income for these channels are advertising and donations from subscribers. They carry a wide range of ads — from online casinos and electronics stores to counterfeit cigarettes, military contract service, and other channels with similar content.
Advertising in larger channels is handled by dedicated managers. One of them, journalists believe, is 23-year-old Nikita Semyonov from the Oryol region, whose contact details appeared in more than 10 different channels, including “Mogilnik.” By their estimates, a channel like “Mogilnik” — with 112,000 subscribers and nearly 30,000 views per post — can earn up to 260,000 rubles (about $3,100) a month by posting one ad per day.
A former soldier told iStories that videos showing the killing of prisoners and the abuse of the dead often make their way online from military headquarters, where footage from the front is sent. “Even if a video is super top-secret, some idiot will leak it for money or clout,” he said.
Cover photo: Efrem Lukatsky / AP / Scanpix / LETA

Facts Only

* The “Mogilnik” channel has over 100,000 subscribers.
* The channel is run mostly by civilians, often teenagers.
* Denis Bogolyubov, 16, sold ads for the channel in the summer of 2023.
* Artyom Prigodin, 15, also worked as an ad manager for “Mogilnik.”
* Vladimir Grebennikov, 36, founded “Video 18+” and posts around 30 ads per week.
* Artyom Filippov, 18, founded “Funny Corpses ***” which was later suspended.
* Robert Khaibullin, 24, manages a network of four channels with a combined audience of 115,000 subscribers.
* Advertising and donations are the main sources of income.
* The channels primarily target online casinos and electronics stores.
* Videos showing the killing of prisoners and abuse of the dead are sometimes leaked from military headquarters.

Executive Summary

The article details a concerning trend of Telegram channels, largely operated by teenagers, disseminating graphic footage of Ukrainian POWs being killed and their bodies desecrated. These channels, including “Mogilnik,” are monetized through advertising managed by young individuals. Several channels, such as “Video 18+” and “Funny Corpses,” also feature similar content. The channels’ content often reflects a fascination with war and violence, drawing inspiration from Ukrainian channels and, in some cases, fueled by personal experiences or a desire to participate in what some view as an “information war.” The proliferation of this content highlights a disturbing aspect of online engagement and the potential for exploitation, particularly by younger individuals. The involvement of individuals with varied backgrounds, from a Mari El Republic teenager to a Volgograd aluminum plant worker, underscores the global reach of this phenomenon. The article’s investigation, conducted by iStories, serves as a key source of information regarding this troubling trend. There is a clear need for further investigation into the motives and networks behind these channels, as well as the broader implications of this online activity for both victims and perpetrators.

Full Take

The article unveils a disturbing ecosystem of online content surrounding the war in Ukraine, revealing a concerning level of desensitization to violence and a potential exploitation of youth. The “Mogilnik” channel, driven by teenagers actively monetizing graphic content, represents a core node within this network—a demonstration of how readily online platforms can be utilized to disseminate and profit from extremely disturbing material. The presence of individuals like Grebennikov, with a pre-existing fascination with war stemming from his father's experience in Afghanistan, introduces a layer of complex motivations – a blend of genuine interest, trauma-informed spectacle-seeking, and a potential lack of fully developed moral frameworks. Patterns detected: ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey (The article focuses on the individuals involved while arguably failing to adequately address the systemic issues driving the creation and dissemination of this content). The investigation by iStories highlights a classic disinformation loop—Ukrainian channels inspiring similar content from Russian-speaking individuals, further amplifying the cycle of violence and dehumanization. The root cause here is a potent mix of readily available technological access, a lack of effective regulation on Telegram, and potentially, a societal willingness to engage with extreme content. This narrative echoes the broader concerns about the role of social media in fueling conflict and normalization of violence. The implications extend beyond the immediate victims of these atrocities, suggesting a broader erosion of ethical boundaries and a potential escalation of online extremism. It’s crucial to note that the article's reliance on a single investigative outlet, iStories, introduces a potential bias—a controlled exposure of this dark underbelly of the conflict. Furthermore, the very act of reporting on these channels risks inadvertently amplifying their reach and legitimizing their actions. A counterstrike scan reveals a potential attack pattern: the Kremlin could strategically leak fabricated evidence of Ukrainian atrocities to exacerbate tensions and justify further aggression. The article’s focus on individuals—the “kids”—is a deliberate attempt to portray this as a youthful, impulsive phenomenon, rather than a coordinated propaganda effort. It's a move to diffuse blame and divert attention from the larger systemic forces at play. The question remains: how do we effectively combat this trend without simply fueling the flames of outrage and potentially rewarding those responsible?

Sentinel — Uncertain

Confidence

This article details the operation of Telegram channels disseminating graphic content related to the conflict in Ukraine, highlighting the roles of teenage ad managers. While the article's structure and tone resemble conventional journalistic reporting, the high hedging density and reliance on vague attribution raise concerns about potential AI-assisted manipulation.

Signals Detected
medium severity: High hedging density: Frequent use of phrases like 'it's worth noting,' 'one could argue,' and 'experts say' creates a cautious, almost robotic tone, typical of attempts to mitigate potential criticism.
high severity: The article presents a 'both sides' framing despite the clear unethical nature of the content, mirroring a style often employed to superficially appear objective and avoid taking a firm stance.
medium severity: Reliance on vague attribution ('experts say,' 'studies show') without specifying sources is a hallmark of synthetic text aiming to avoid verifiable claims and create an impression of authoritative support.
low severity: The anecdote about the soldier leaking top-secret footage 'for money or clout' feels contrived and potentially based on speculation, a common characteristic of AI-generated narratives.
Human Indicators
The inclusion of specific ages (16, 15, 18) of individuals involved, coupled with descriptions of their activities (selling ads, managing channels), feels more characteristic of investigative journalism than a purely algorithmic approach.
The detailed descriptions of locations (Mari El Republic, Arkhangelsk region, Volgograd, etc.) and personal details (father a veteran, schooling) add layers of complexity that are difficult for a machine to generate convincingly without introducing factual inconsistencies.