A residential building and a telecommunications tower were struck overnight, as Iran and the US launched more strikes over the control of Strait of Hormuz.
Tehran, Iran – The city of Kuhestak, located in southern Iran’s Sirik County in Hormozgan province, close to the Strait of Hormuz, was the target of multiple overnight attacks by the United States military, with local sources and authorities saying a wedding ceremony was struck.
The Hormozgan governor’s office on Wednesday identified four victims as four-year-old Amir Ali Karimi, 16-year-old Mohammad Malahi, 43-year-old Kolsoum Malahi and 43-year-old Zarkhatoun Taheri. More than 60 others were wounded, some seriously.
Recommended Stories
list of 4 items- list 1 of 4UN watchdog urges access to Iran nuclear sites over proliferation concerns
- list 2 of 4Iran says US bombed a wedding party in Sirik, killing five people
- list 3 of 4‘We had an ordinary life’: Iran fisherwoman navigates uncertainty of war
- list 4 of 4Iran, US exchange new attacks: Who was hit in latest strikes?
Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for US Central Command (CENTCOM), said they were aware of reports of civilian casualties “originated from Iranian state media”.
“The US military never targets civilians, unlike the IRGC,” he said, in reference to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
But while the operational details behind the strikes remain unclear, numerous videos and images from the area, witness accounts and official reports indicate that multiple projectiles hit Kuhestak, some to deadly effect.
Footage showed that several projectiles struck a telecommunications tower located near the city’s shoreline and destroyed it, with some locals saying they believed drones were among the weapons used. Based on fragments found in Kuhestak, defence experts say it might be a variant of the AGM-84K SLAM-ER, which manufacturer Boeing describes as an advanced precision-guided, air-launched cruise missile with “surgical strike capability”.
Wednesday morning’s footage, taken from some distance from the telecom tower, shows at least one direct hit to the roof of the building where the wedding was taking place.
More videos, released by locals and state media, showed partial destruction and debris inside the building, and electricity going out in the area. Women’s and children’s slippers could be seen scattered around. Several other adjacent residential buildings also sustained damage.
A state television reporter said three US missiles were used in the attack, with one penetrating through the roof and creating a 1.5-metre (5-foot) hole in the ground.
A man identified as Ali Malahi, the owner of the targeted building where his daughter’s wedding was taking place, told state television that people inside were all civilians.
State TV footage from a hospital in the area showed several wounded children and their families receiving medical care.
A young local man wounded in the attack said he and others were heading towards the house when they heard jets flying above, and the bombs caused massive explosions while they were arriving.
“Many young children and women were horribly wounded,” he said from the hospital bed.
A woman with bloodied hands said in a video released by state-linked SNN that she was there at the scene and could confirm that people present at the scene were civilians.
“This house was by no means close to any military site,” she said, adding that it appeared the munitions were directly targeting the building.
The Iranian Red Crescent Society said the incident was thoroughly documented, as it released several images from the site of the attack and the children who were injured.
It wrote to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, seeking legal action against the perpetrators of the “grave” attack.
Other prominent attacks on civilians
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the strikes in Kuhestak complete the “catalogue of atrocities against the nation of Iran” by the US.
“This cruelty cannot be separated from the chain of atrocities that preceded it in Minab, Lamerd, Qeshm and elsewhere nor from the strikes on military targets that were dressed in deceptive justifications,” spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei wrote on X.
“More dangerous than the bomb itself is the normalisation of bombing; and more dangerous than silence is the conversion of silence into legitimacy,” he said.
In Minab, also located in Hormozgan province, the deadliest strike of the war in terms of civilian casualties largely destroyed an elementary school packed with children on the first day of the war on February 28. The attack killed about 170 people, mostly schoolchildren, as well as teachers, parents and others.
Despite evidence that its Tomahawk missiles were used in the attack, the US military has refused to release findings from its investigation. CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper claimed the school was located “on an active IRGC cruise missile base”.
In the southern Fars province’s city of Lamerd, evidence and witness accounts pointed to a missile strike on a sports hall being used by a women’s volleyball team on the first day of the war, killing 21 people, including four children.
While CENTCOM denied responsibility and accused Iran, investigations by The New York Times, BBC and independent analysts concluded that a US Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) was responsible for the destruction.
The munition was designed to explode midair, scattering thousands of tungsten pellets that could claim casualties and deal damage to buildings and vehicles in a large area.
During over six months of war on Iran, the US and Israel have also struck critical infrastructure like oil and gas facilities, fuel depots, steel and petrochemical factories, airports, ports and bridges, as well as power installations, medical centres and water facilities.
More than 3,500 Iranians have been killed since the start of the war, including more than 50 during the 60-day truce amid renewed fighting in July, according to authorities.
Facts Only
* Residential building and a telecommunications tower were struck overnight near Kuhestak, Iran.
* The attacks occurred while Iran and the US launched strikes over the control of the Strait of Hormuz.
* Four victims identified are Amir Ali Karimi (four), Mohammad Malahi (sixteen), Kolsoum Malahi (43), and Zarkhatoun Taheri (43).
* More than 60 people were wounded, some seriously.
* Projectiles struck a telecommunications tower near the city's shoreline and destroyed it.
* Footage showed at least one direct hit to the roof of the building where a wedding was taking place.
* Three US missiles were reported as being used in the attack, with one penetrating the roof and creating a 1.5-meter hole in the ground.
* Witnesses stated that people inside the targeted building were civilians.
* Multiple adjacent residential buildings also sustained damage.
* The Iranian Red Crescent Society released images of the site and injured children.
Executive Summary
Multiple overnight attacks by the United States military struck Kuhestak, a city in Sirik County, Hormozgan province, near the Strait of Hormuz, in Iran. The targets included a residential building and a telecommunications tower. Local sources indicated that a wedding ceremony was targeted. Four individuals were identified as victims: Amir Ali Karimi (four), Mohammad Malahi (sixteen), Kolsoum Malahi (forty-three), and Zarkhatoun Taheri (forty-three). More than sixty people were wounded, some seriously. A spokesperson for US Central Command stated that reports of civilian casualties originated from Iranian state media and asserted that the US military does not target civilians, unlike the IRGC.
Evidence from the area, including videos and witness accounts, showed projectiles hitting the telecommunications tower near the shoreline, which was destroyed. Defence experts suggest fragments found might be a variant of the AGM-84K SLAM-ER missile system. Footage indicated direct hits to the roof of the building where the wedding occurred, with reports suggesting three US missiles were used in the attack. Eyewitnesses reported explosions while they were arriving at the location, and some confirmed that the people present were civilians. The Iranian Red Crescent Society documented the incident and sought legal action against perpetrators.
Full Take
The narrative presented centers on the invocation of civilian vulnerability within a conflict zone, juxtaposed against claims of targeting military objectives. The operational details are obscured by competing narratives: the US asserts non-targeting of civilians while local reports and physical evidence suggest otherwise; similarly, Iranian state media frames these actions as part of an ongoing pattern of atrocities. This creates a dynamic where accountability is contested between sources that operate under different legitimacy frameworks—official military statements versus ground-level witness accounts and humanitarian documentation. The escalation from a localized event (a wedding) to the broader context of strikes on civilian infrastructure and public spaces suggests a strategic deployment of imagery intended to solidify a specific geopolitical position, as exemplified by the comparison made to previous incidents in Minab and Lamerd. The ambiguity surrounding missile identification and accountability—with the US refusing to release full investigation findings—leaves a critical void where causal certainty resides. This pattern highlights how information warfare functions not just through the delivery of facts, but through the contestation of whose reality is validated by documented evidence.
Bridge Questions:
What independent verification methods exist for distinguishing between kinetic strikes against military targets and those resulting in civilian harm in contested areas? How does the deliberate framing of specific incidents (like a wedding) function to normalize broader patterns of violence for different audiences? What mechanisms are needed to establish shared, verifiable standards for accountability when international actors rely on state-controlled media to disseminate information about aerial operations?
Sentinel — Human
The article reads like a compilation of investigative reporting that weaves official statements with eyewitness accounts and expert analysis of military technology, pointing toward human journalistic structuring rather than pure synthetic generation.