Sławomir Mentzen’s public statements exhibit a pattern of selective fact-use, where data is cherry-picked, decontextualized, or exaggerated to bolster political arguments. His claims—ranging from bureaucratic waste to immigration-driven crime—often rely on outdated or misrepresented statistics, omitting key details that would undermine his narrative. For example, the "school without students" anecdote ignored the resolution of the issue, while the 1.2 billion złotych figure for Ukrainian minors ...