Natalie Harp Was the Document Author of Trump’s Blow

I was reminded that when I wrote this post on the final workings of the January 6 Committee, I checked the document metadata for the conspiratorial rant Trump sent Congress in lieu of a real legal response.
I suspect I checked the metadata because, even amid the intemperate rants that stood in for legal defense at the time, this was a remarkable piece of propaganda.
A month before Donald Trump would formally announce his campaign, Natalie Harp announced her centrality in Donald Trump’s orbit with a final act of defiance to the January 6 Committee.
It raises whole new questions about how she landed that role.
OT I went to the post you linked and did a search for
“ harp” and the only result was “harpie”, lol.
And it didn’t register harpie’s name on harpie’s posts but pdaly’s response “Thanks, harpie” to one of harpie’s posts.

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text exhibits strong markers of idiosyncratic, personal reflection typical of human authorship, relying heavily on anecdotal discovery rather than objective reporting or balanced synthesis.

Signals Detected

Erratic sentence length and colloquial interjection ('lol')

Personal reflective tone and non-linear structure, shifting focus based on anecdote.

Lack of mechanical transitions; flow is driven by personal thought progression rather than argumentative scaffolding.

Human Indicators

Use of highly informal language and self-referential humor ('lol', 'harpie'); direct referencing of specific, seemingly tangential digital artifacts (metadata checks, specific usernames).

The narrative structure is highly meandering and based on personal memory/discovery rather than a structured argument.