US President Donald Trump on Saturday said the United States and Israel had agreed to suspend planned military strikes on Iran after receiving a request from Tehran and several Middle Eastern countries, claiming that the framework of a deal to end the conflict had been reached.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the proposed agreement would include the "immediate, complete, and total" reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important shipping routes for oil and gas, which he said had largely remained closed by Iran since the war began on February 28.
"The U.S.A. is locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran, at levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II. Despite this, we have just been asked by Iran, and other Middle Eastern Countries, to hold off any attack in that the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to. This would include the Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran's nuclear threat," Trump wrote.
"Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL," he added.
Trump also said Israel had agreed to join the United States in pursuing the proposed agreement, which he claimed could bring the war to an end.
"Get to work, everybody, and get it DONE," he wrote.
Trump's remarks came a day after he warned that the US was prepared to launch fresh attacks on Iran.
Speaking during a Cabinet meeting at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland on Friday, he said: "We'll be hitting him very hard and, you know, at some point they're going to say, 'We just can't take it anymore'."
According to The Wall Street Journal, Trump had ordered preparations for a new strike intended to pressure Iran into surrendering, with operations potentially beginning over the weekend.
CBS News also reported that the United States and Israel were discussing coordinated strikes on Iran's energy-related infrastructure. Citing unnamed sources, the broadcaster said Trump had not yet given final approval, although both countries were working closely on military planning.
Had the operation gone ahead, it would have marked Israel's first participation in attacks on Iran since the opening phase of the conflict.
The United States resumed military operations against Iran last month after accusing Tehran of targeting commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded by launching attacks on US military facilities in Gulf countries.
The two sides had reached a preliminary agreement in June aimed at ending the conflict. The deal called for an immediate halt to military operations, including in Lebanon, and committed both countries to negotiating a final agreement within 60 days.
However, Trump declared on July 8 that the agreement was "over". Iran later suspended the memorandum of understanding, accusing Washington of "violating all its commitments".
If implemented, the latest proposal would mark the first significant diplomatic breakthrough since the conflict escalated earlier this year.
(With agencies' input)
Stay informed on all the latest news, real-time breaking news updates, and follow all the important headlines in india news and world news on Zee News.
Facts Only
* US President Donald Trump stated an agreement was reached between the United States and Israel to suspend planned military strikes on Iran based on requests from Tehran and Middle Eastern countries.
* The proposed agreement included the immediate, complete, and total reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
* Trump claimed this agreement included an end to Iran's nuclear threat.
* Trump stated he agreed to cancel an attack subject to rapidly making a deal for the future benefit of the world and Iran.
* Trump asserted Israel had agreed to join the U.S. in pursuing the proposed agreement.
* Trump previously warned the U.S. was prepared to launch fresh attacks on Iran.
* A day prior, Trump warned that military action against Iran would be severe.
* The U.S. resumed military operations against Iran last month after accusing Tehran of targeting commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
* The two sides had previously reached a preliminary agreement in June to halt military operations and negotiate a final agreement within 60 days, which Trump later declared "over."
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative presents a dynamic where high-stakes geopolitical maneuvers are framed through the lens of unilateral negotiation and perceived power shifts. The core tension lies between stated military readiness—evidenced by prior threats of strikes and ongoing discussions over coordinated operations—and an agreement predicated on concessions (opening the Strait of Hormuz, addressing nuclear threats). The structure reveals a pattern where immediate, dramatic claims about a framework being established are asserted as settled facts ("the framework of a deal had been reached"), which immediately preempts deeper scrutiny of the mechanism or commitment. This creates a space where real-time military posturing and diplomatic signaling function more to assert dominance than to establish verifiable consensus. The tension between past agreements (the June memorandum) and the current assertion of a new, immediate agreement highlights how established frameworks are treated as malleable tools in an ongoing conflict rather than fixed commitments. The implication is that stability is contingent not on mutual adherence to documented processes but on whichever party asserts the most compelling narrative at any given moment.
BRIDGE QUESTIONS: What independent verification exists for the claims made by President Trump regarding the status and terms of the agreement, beyond his platform? How do the differing historical timelines of agreements influence the perception of current diplomatic breakthroughs? What systemic structures permit high-level military posturing to precede or supersede established diplomatic protocols in conflict zones?
Sentinel — Human
The text appears to be a compilation of reported events regarding diplomatic discussions and military posturing, structured like standard news reporting with multiple source references.