Many people, including myself, have been thinking about the state of media a lot lately and people are increasingly asking me for my take on things. We all have had our “bunnies on the trampoline” moment, in which we were completely tricked by an artificial intelligence video on social media for the first time; mine was with that very video just a few months ago. What once felt like a novelty seemingly overnight has turned into a daily threat. Over the past few years, we have sadly become accustomed to seeing false content on social media, but now this content is often accompanied with a realistic-looking (but fake) video. This makes it even harder to distinguish what is real and what is fake.
The pace at which this is accelerating should alarm all of us. Just a few weeks ago, in the aftermath of the “El Mencho” killing in Jalisco, MND reported on the amount of fake news that was being produced, shared, and most troublingly, believed by people around the world. No, cartels were not running through the Puerto Vallarta airport shooting people. No, there wasn’t a passenger airplane lit on fire at the Puerto Vallarta airport. No, the Puerto Vallarta Costco wasn’t burned down. And no, President Sheinbaum didn’t have to spend the night on a Mexican Navy ship at sea to secure her safety.
Fake fires, real fear: Debunking the lies that went viral after ‘El Mencho’ fell
Yet these clickbait stories and videos “worked” well — devastatingly well. In a world of scrolling images that we often look at for just a second, they worked to create misinformation and misunderstanding, frighten people, and ultimately resulted in massive cancellations by visitors to Mexico. I have talked to people in the tourism and real estate sectors from across the country — Oaxaca, the Riviera Maya, Mexico City, San Miguel de Allende, Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta — who have all lamented the significant shock to their businesses that were suffered as a result of the “post-Mencho” fake news media circus. Real livelihoods, real financial losses — all caused by fake content created and spread in minutes.
If that wasn’t enough to make you stop and think, just weeks later, we are seeing it happen again on an even larger scale on the war with Iran. On March 14, the New York Times ran a comprehensive article titled, “Cascade of AI fakes about war with Iran causes chaos online.” The paper shared 37 fake images and videos falsely depicting active war, 5 fake images and videos falsely depicting war preparation, 8 fake images and videos falsely depicting war destruction, 43 memes made with AI, and on and on and on.
Which brings me to why I have been thinking so much about the media lately. Can you imagine if we did not have sources like the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and Mexico News Daily? (Yes, I am a bit biased on that last one.) This has nothing to do with being on the right or left side of the political aisle and this isn’t about opinion pieces that we agree or disagree with. This is about having trustworthy sources that help us make sense of the cesspool of misleading and fake AI-generated content flooding our feeds every single day. The misuse of AI is no longer a future concern — it is the defining information challenge of right now. In a world where actors are increasingly and deliberately trying to sow chaos and confusion (often for nefarious purposes), how will we know what to believe? This was a question just beginning to be asked not too long ago that is now an urgent, daily reality with real-world consequences.
Fortunately, us adults can turn to trusted sources that can help make sense of it all. Many of us know what “reliable” looks like and we search these sources out to help us understand what is going on. That’s why people are subscribing to media outlets like the NYT, WSJ, and MND faster than ever. But what about kids? How will they learn to differentiate what is real news from what is fake? How will they learn the importance of understanding the difference? How will they understand the gravity and implications of getting it wrong? How will they learn what media sources to turn to for clarity, for objectivity, for honesty?
It is with that backdrop that we created MND Kids last year and why we are further doubling down on this initiative today. Since the launch of this platform over 6 months ago, thousands of kids of all ages in both Mexico and the United States have used MND Kids to improve their media literacy. Both educators and parents are now using it to help their kids learn how to read the news, have conversations about fake versus real news, and to reinforce the importance of reading real, unbiased, apolitical news to help them learn how to think critically about things. Equally as important, our content has allowed kids to learn about the good things going on in Mexico that are so often missing from many media sources. MND Kids isn’t about clickbait; it’s about building media literacy, instilling a comprehensive understanding of Mexico, and being proud of Mexico’s historical and current accomplishments.
Today, we are taking our efforts even further. We just started a new pilot program called “MND Young Journalists.” This program encourages kids inspired by MND Kids content to write their own news articles. The program helps make reading and writing non-fiction content more accessible and relevant. It encourages active learning. It teaches kids the power of the pen.
Each week, the editors at MND will review the submissions from MND Kids readers and publish one of them on our MND Kids site under the “Young Journalists” tab. We believe — with conviction — that it has never been more urgent for the next generation to learn critical thinking, media analysis, and the ability to form and express an educated, thoughtful opinion about the world around them. The importance of learning to read to review the facts, form an educated opinion, and share that opinion in a thoughtful, logical way is one of the most important things we can teach our kids. It may also be one of the most important defenses we have against the AI misinformation epidemic bearing down on all of us.
The team at MND is very proud to help motivate and inspire the next generation of thinkers and leaders. We won’t pretend that it has been easy. Navigating the politics and bureaucracy of school systems is not something we have experience in. In truth, it has been painfully slow. But the urgency of what is happening in the world right now does not allow us to wait for the system to catch up. With that said, we continue to aggressively invest and grow this initiative as we feel that it is as important as anything else that we do.
You have a role to play in this too:
If you think your kids, grandkids, nieces, nephews or friend’s kids would benefit by reading MND Kids, you can check out the site here: mndkids.com.
You can also add MND Kids to your MND subscription by upgrading to a family plan that includes MND Kids here: Upgrade – Mexico News Daily.
And if you know of a school district or after school program that would benefit from MND Kids, please email us at: kids@mexiconewsdaily.com.
You can learn more about MND Kids here: About MND Kids.
And by the way: The lead photo of this article shows a story written by MND Kids reader Nathalie of Aurora, Illinois, who wrote a recent news article about “Punch the Japanese monkey” as part of a homework assignment in class to write an article in style of MND Kids. Damn, that’s inspiring!
Travis Bembenek is the CEO of Mexico News Daily and has been living, working or playing in Mexico for nearly 30 years.
Facts Only
* The article was published by Mexico News Daily (MND).
* The primary concern is the spread of false information, including fake videos, on social media.
* The "El Mencho" case in Puerto Vallarta involved fabricated reports of shootings, a burning airport, and other false events.
* The New York Times reported on 37 AI-generated images and videos related to the Iran conflict.
* MND has created a platform called MND Kids to promote media literacy.
* The MND Young Journalists program encourages children to write their own news articles.
* The article highlights the potential damage to businesses (tourism and real estate) caused by false information.
* The author, Travis Bembenek, has been living and working in Mexico for nearly 30 years.
Executive Summary
Full Take
Patterns detected: ARC-0043 Motte-and-Bailey – The article’s framing of the issue as a simple “fake news” problem obscures the deeper systemic vulnerabilities at play. The focus on “AI-generated content” as the sole culprit deflects attention from the underlying incentives driving the rapid spread of misinformation – the algorithms of social media platforms, the business models reliant on engagement, and the amplification of outrage. The story presents a superficially compelling narrative of children needing protection, but doesn't grapple with the fundamental challenge of how a networked society can effectively counter coordinated deception at scale. It's a classic “motte-and-bailey” tactic: build a small, easily defensible claim (AI is the problem), then criticize anything that challenges that claim.
The narrative also relies heavily on emotional exploitation (ARC-0018 Fear Appeal), leveraging anxieties about chaos, security threats, and the potential for economic disruption. The repeated use of dramatic language – "devastatingly well," "massive cancellations," "wake up" – aims to trigger immediate emotional responses rather than fostering reasoned deliberation. The portrayal of children as particularly vulnerable represents a further manipulation, appealing to parental instincts and framing the solution as simply “teaching kids” rather than tackling the structural issues.
Furthermore, there’s a subtle Systemic drift (ARC-0087 Mission Drift) evident in MND’s expansion beyond simply reporting news to actively shaping narratives through its educational content. While promoting media literacy is a worthy goal, the article doesn't address the inherent tension between objective reporting and the potential for bias, however well-intentioned. The reliance on MND as the definitive source—a single entity—creates a dangerous centralization of information control.
The impulse to create MND Kids is, in part, a defensive reaction to this crisis, but it also risks reinforcing a top-down approach to media literacy that mirrors the very structures it claims to critique. The question isn’t simply whether kids can distinguish between real and fake news, but whether they’re equipped to critically evaluate *all* sources of information, including those presented by established institutions.
The urgency invoked – "urgent, daily reality with real-world consequences" – is strategically deployed to heighten the sense of crisis and drive immediate action towards the solution presented: MND Kids. This aligns with a broader tactic of creating a sense of panic around information itself.
Bridge Questions: Beyond simply identifying misinformation, how can we design systems that incentivize truth and discourage deception? What role should social media platforms play in combating the spread of AI-generated disinformation, and what safeguards are necessary to prevent censorship or manipulation?