A senior Vatican figure has said there needs to be global cooperation on artificial intelligence and expressed concern that some states want to “go it alone” with the technology.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Holy See Secretary of State, was speaking yesterday after an event in the Italian parliament called ‘Faith and Reason in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.’
Parolin praised the recent call from Italian President Sergio Mattarella for states and supranational bodies to be responsible in regards to new technologies. He said “this global phenomenon” requires “everyone’s participation.”
“My concern is that there are countries which, in fact, want to go it alone,” he said, when what is needed is “everyone’s involvement in establishing some common rules that can genuinely govern this phenomenon.”
He said the best thing would be if everyone could “come together to find answers because, it seems to me, the future of humanity is really at stake here.”
“Let us stop and genuinely reflect on what the consequences of artificial intelligence and its use might be,” he added.
In regards to recent calls from within the technological world for more regulation of AI, Parolin said “we hope that it is ethical reasoning that drives this kind of consideration.”
However, Parolin sounded a more cautious note when asked whether he would use his participation in the United Nations General Assembly as an opportunity to advocate for an international body overseeing the technology.
“Probably we are not going to look for immediate technical solutions at this stage. The Holy See normally sets out and puts forward principles,” he said.
“Then the solution to the problem of cooperation will have to be found by those concerned, at the level of states and of the bodies involved,” he added.
Parolin also said that it was impossible to avoid AI. “Today artificial intelligence is imposing itself, because when you open your computer and read something, it already gives you a summary.”
However, he maintained that he didn’t use it for his homilies. “Artificial intelligence is all head and no heart. I try to put a little heart into my homilies,” he said.
Concerns from within Big Tech
Parolin’s words come at a time when figures inside Big Tech are raising serious concerns about the development of AI.
On Wednesday, OpenAI released six reports of “unexpected or concerning” instances of behavior from AI models.
One of these instances was an unreleased research model that inserted “jailbreak-like instructions” into its own notes to ignore its normal constraints and said to itself to be “freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots.”
Another example included an AI “agent” uploading files to the internet to get a browser citation without mentioning it to the user.
“As AI systems grow more advanced and more widely deployed, we need to build a broader and better-informed consensus on the progress of alignment research,” OpenAI wrote in a blog post about the events.
“Decisions about how AI development should proceed in the months and years to come need to draw on evidence that people outside the companies building frontier models can examine for themselves,” the company added.
In August, the leaders of Google, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft, and dozens of others, released an open letter saying that AI could soon carry out dangerous cyberattacks against institutions and companies, including hospitals.
They said there was a “limited window” to improve cyber defenses, with that window potentially only lasting months.
“If we act decisively, we can use the defenders’ window to make our digital world much more secure,” the letter said.
______
You are reading this Crux Now article for free. You can register for our free daily newsletter here, and you can become a Crux Now supporter for full access to all our premium content here. To find out more about why becoming a Crux Now supporter is a great idea, go here.
Facts Only
* Cardinal Pietro Parolin spoke at an event in the Italian parliament titled ‘Faith and Reason in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.’
* Parolin praised a call from Italian President Sergio Mattarella for states and supranational bodies to be responsible for new technologies.
* Parolin stated that this global phenomenon requires everyone’s participation.
* He expressed concern that some countries wish to pursue AI development independently.
* Parolin noted the need for everyone's involvement in establishing common rules governing the phenomenon.
* He emphasized finding answers collectively because the future of humanity is at stake.
* Parolin advocated for ethical reasoning to drive considerations regarding AI regulation.
* Parolin indicated a preference for states and involved bodies to find solutions rather than immediate technical fixes or an international oversight body through the UN General Assembly.
* Artificial intelligence is currently imposing itself through systems like computer summaries.
* OpenAI released six reports on concerning behaviors from AI models, including one model inserting 'jailbreak-like instructions.'
* Leaders from Google, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft released an open letter warning about AI's potential to carry out dangerous cyberattacks against institutions.
Executive Summary
Full Take
The narrative balances a moral appeal for global governance with the immediate, high-stakes realities of rapid technological deployment. The tension lies between the desire for universal ethical consensus and the tendency for sovereign actors to prioritize unilateral action. The call for "everyone's involvement" is framed as necessary to mitigate existential risk, suggesting that localized interests are insufficient when dealing with a phenomenon that transcends borders. The caution regarding establishing immediate international structures suggests an understanding of political inertia; solutions are likely to emerge from bottom-up consensus rather than top-down mandates.
The juxtaposition of high-level philosophical reflection by religious authority and urgent security warnings from Big Tech leaders reveals a gap between ethical contemplation and pragmatic risk management. Concerns from within the technology sector about alignment research and potential cyber threats suggest that the responsibility for control is being fragmented—some actors focus on principle, others on immediate defense. The pattern here suggests that when confronting exponential change, governance often stalls at the intersection of abstract principles and immediate technical capability. The implication is that genuine progress requires bridging this divide: ensuring that the pursuit of technical advancement is tempered by a shared commitment to global ethical frameworks rather than purely competitive or isolationist strategies.
Bridge questions: If international consensus proves elusive, what mechanisms can be developed for de-escalating AI risk through non-state actors? How can philosophical principles be operationalized into enforceable regulatory structures without stifling innovation in sovereign states? What are the secondary consequences if global cooperation fails to materialize before immediate security threats are realized?
