The other night, we watched the brief but powerful 9/11 documentary Boatlift with our kids. Made in 2011 and narrated by Tom Hanks, Boatlift is a 12-minute film on the largest waterway evacuation in American history.
The story is simple: As the towers fell and people ran through the chaos of lower Manhattan looking to escape the danger without access to mass transit and with roads and bridges closed off, the Coast Guard put out a general call for a volunteer boatlift. The massive response created a civil convoy that surpassed anyone’s expectations and produced one of the better stories of American selflessness and heroism in the country’s history.
Yes, in the country’s history. Just to give readers an idea of what this boatlift accomplished: According to Britannica, the Dunkirk evacuation in World War II carried 338,000 British, French and Belgian troops to safety over nine days.
The 9/11 boatlift ferried 500,000 people to safety in nine hours.
It’s not an apples-to-apples comparison, of course, but hopefully it at least paints a picture of the magnitude of the ad hoc effort.
“I saw four businessmen lifting up an old woman with a seeing-eye dog… and they lifted her up like a surfboard and passed her over the handrails” and onto a boat, recalled one official. Sometimes spouses, separated and each unaware of the other’s fate, were reunited on these boats.
We talk a lot about the lessons of 9/11, of the changed world that emerged from it, of geopolitical realignment, of domestic security policy, of Islamist terrorism and the War on Terror. For my generation in particular, born after Vietnam but too young to fully appreciate the fall of the Iron Curtain, it was a defining moment.
And one unforgettable element of that day was the heroism. Younger Americans have no memory of that day, and what they are missing out on, aside from the terror and the grief and the anger, is the way the civilian response filled one with a deep sense of gratitude for the cosmic gift of being an American.
Which is why 9/11 education ought to be mandatory, and young Americans should learn not only the Big Ideas around this earthshattering event but what happened on that day itself at the granular level.
Here’s what I mean. The Associated Press this week produced a state-by-state summary of 9/11 curriculum requirements. Much of it is optional or flexible, and much of it misses the point.
Arkansas requires students to learn about the “change and continuity in foreign policy since 2001 after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.” One world history prompt for California 10th-graders states: “Since 9/11, the hopes for a more peaceful world that the end of the Cold War spawned have been displaced by a resurgence of international conflict.” In Idaho, we learn, “High school U.S. history students now must assess government responses to terrorism, ‘including those after Sept. 11, 2001, and analyze the causes, progression and aftermath’ of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.” In Missouri, high-schoolers are tasked with “unpacking post-9/11 foreign policy.”
After 9/11, since 9/11, post-9/11, etc. Those are important lessons! So are the ones that require students to talk about what happened before 9/11. But what about on 9/11?
I admit I was, at first, rather appalled at the list provided by the AP. But it is just a summary and should not be taken as the full extent of what actually goes on in classrooms around the country, where teachers and administrators have plenty of flexibility to shape students’ understanding of 9/11 and how it should be memorialized. And there is bound to be a range of differences among the 50 states.
But I also noticed that some states pretty much nailed it. Here is the AP’s description of Florida’s educational approach to 9/11:
“A 2023 Florida law requires at least 45 minutes a year of 9/11-related instruction in some middle and high school classes. The statute lists points to cover: historical context on terrorism, the attack timeline, acts of heroism and charity, the ‘importance of respecting civil liberties while ensuring safety and security,’ and more. It notably mentions not only those killed and wounded but also people who fell ill after being exposed to toxins when the World Trade Center’s burning twin towers collapsed. State standards go into still more detail. It’s all intended ‘to ensure this important event in America’s history is not only remembered but also integrated into civics and resiliency education statewide,’ the state Department of Education said.”
Exemplary. New York’s requirements are a mixed bag with plenty of potential. Pennsylvania’s aren’t bad. Both states were directly affected by the attacks themselves, so it’s no surprise to see their plans include moments of silence on each anniversary.
Virginia has the right idea, too. There, middle-schoolers give “special attention to the heroism displayed by passengers on the plane that went down in Pennsylvania. High school juniors analyze 9/11 and other ‘key events and conditions that have given rise to terrorism as an attack on democracy and the United States’ role in defending democracy.’”
Children aren’t born knowing what happened on 9/11. We have to teach them. And among the earliest lessons that are appropriate for young students is one that reminds them what that day means for Americans, including the miracles that the American people are capable of in the face of terror and tragedy.
Facts Only
* Boatlift is a 12-minute documentary narrated by Tom Hanks and released in 2011.
* The 9/11 boatlift evacuated 500,000 people from lower Manhattan in nine hours.
* The Dunkirk evacuation of World War II transported 338,000 troops over nine days.
* The Associated Press published a state-by-state summary of 9/11 curriculum requirements.
* Arkansas curriculum focuses on foreign policy changes since 2001.
* California 10th-grade prompts address international conflict following the Cold War and 9/11.
* Idaho high school students assess government responses to terrorism and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
* Missouri high school students analyze post-9/11 foreign policy.
* A 2023 Florida law mandates at least 45 minutes of 9/11-related instruction annually for some middle and high school classes.
* Florida's requirements include the attack timeline, acts of heroism, civil liberties, and health effects of toxins.
* Virginia middle schoolers study the heroism of passengers on the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.
Executive Summary
The 9/11 boatlift represents one of the largest emergency waterway evacuations in American history, moving 500,000 people to safety in a nine-hour window. This event serves as a primary example of civilian heroism and ad hoc cooperation during a national crisis. While the scale of the effort is often compared to military evacuations like Dunkirk to illustrate its magnitude, it remains a distinct instance of non-governmental mobilization.
Current educational approaches to 9/11 vary significantly across U.S. states. Many curricula focus on "big idea" outcomes, such as shifts in foreign policy, geopolitical realignment, and the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Other states, notably Florida and Virginia, emphasize a more granular approach, incorporating the timeline of the attacks and specific acts of individual heroism. There is an ongoing debate regarding whether 9/11 education should prioritize the systemic political aftermath or the immediate human experiences and civic resiliency demonstrated on the day of the attacks.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative argues that the historical memory of 9/11 is being sanitized into academic abstractions—foreign policy and geopolitical shifts—at the expense of the human stories of courage and civic unity that define the American character. By focusing on the "post-9/11" world, educators may inadvertently strip the event of its visceral, moral significance for younger generations.
The argument relies on a contrast between "granular" heroism and "Big Idea" policy. While the author acknowledges that policy lessons are important, they use a specific, highly emotive example—the 9/11 boatlift—to frame the current educational status quo as deficient. This creates a narrative where the "correct" way to remember the event is through the lens of national resiliency and gratitude, rather than systemic analysis.
Patterns detected: none
The driving paradigm is one of civic exceptionalism. It assumes that the primary value of historical education is not just factual or analytical, but the cultivation of a specific emotional bond to national identity. The implication is that without this "granular" focus on heroism, the "cosmic gift" of citizenship is lost on the youth.
Bridge Questions:
1. Is there a fundamental conflict between teaching the systemic political consequences of 9/11 and teaching the individual acts of heroism, or can they be integrated?
2. How does the selection of specific "heroic" narratives shape a student's understanding of national identity compared to "policy-driven" narratives?
3. What criteria should determine which "granular" details of a tragedy are mandatory for students to learn?
Counterstrike Scan: A coordinated campaign would use specific, heart-tugging anecdotes to discredit academic curricula as "out of touch" or "anti-patriotic" to push for state-mandated emotional narratives. The actual content does not match this; it provides specific examples of existing state laws and acknowledges the validity of policy-based education.
