The 2026 edition of the #1Lib1RefNG campaign was held from 1 June to 30 June 2026 by Wikimedia User Group Nigeria as part of the global #1Lib1Ref (One Librarian, One Reference) initiative. The campaign aimed to improve the quality, reliability, and verifiability of Wikipedia by encouraging librarians, Wikimedians, and knowledge enthusiasts across Nigeria to add missing citations to Wikipedia articles.This year’s campaign combined a nationwide editing contest with community-led edit-a-thons, complemented by virtual and in-person training sessions that equipped both new and experienced contributors with the skills needed to make impactful contributions.
Activities and Engagement
Virtual Office Hour
A virtual office hour was held on 13 June 2026 to onboard new participants, provide editing guidance, and respond to questions about the campaign. The interactive session helped participants understand how to identify citation gaps and contribute effectively to Wikipedia.
In-Person Training
On 24th June 2026, an in-person training was organized in collaboration with the Nigerian Library Association (NLA), Kaduna State Chapter, at Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. The training introduced participants to citation best practices using the citation hunt tool, Wikipedia editing, and the goals of the #1Lib1Ref campaign.
Community Edit-a-thons
Community networks and fanclubs across Nigeria organized local edit-a-thons with support from the Community Micro Grants program, enabling wider participation across different regions. Active networks such as the Abuja Network, Gombe Network, Kaduna Network and Imo Network, among others, demonstrating the campaign’s nationwide reach.
Campaign Winners
To qualify for the competition, participants registered on the Outreach Dashboard and tracked their contributions using both the #1Lib1Ref and #1Lib1RefNG hashtags.
Top Contributors
- Prizes1st Place: ₦100,000 Gift Voucher
- 2nd Place: ₦70,000 Gift Voucher
- 3rd Place: ₦50,000 Gift Voucher
- 1st Place: Muhdavdullahi 90.19 points
- 2nd Place: Sardeeq 84.89 points
- 3rd Place: Timzy D’Great 65.44 points
Campaign Tools
The campaign utilized several Wikimedia tools to support participation and track contributions, including:
Organizing Team
The campaign was coordinated by:
Halima Waziri – Co-Lead, #1Lib1RefNG 2026
Ayokanmi – Programs Director, Wikimedia User Group Nigeria
Bibisuccess – (Interim Project Officer, WUGN)
Conclusion
The #1Lib1RefNG 2026 campaign successfully brought together librarians, Wikimedians, and volunteers from across Nigeria to strengthen the reliability of Wikipedia by improving article sourcing. Through training, collaborative editing events, and a nationwide competition, the campaign reinforced the important role of librarians and open knowledge advocates in ensuring access to trustworthy and verifiable information.
Can you help us translate this article?
In order for this article to reach as many people as possible we would like your help. Can you translate this article to get the message out?
Start translation
Facts Only
* Wikimedia User Group Nigeria held the #1Lib1RefNG campaign from 1 June to 30 June 2026.
* The campaign focused on adding missing citations to Wikipedia articles.
* A virtual office hour occurred on 13 June 2026.
* In-person training took place on 24 June 2026 at Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
* The Nigerian Library Association (NLA), Kaduna State Chapter, collaborated on the in-person training.
* Local edit-a-thons were organized by Abuja, Gombe, Kaduna, and Imo networks.
* Community Micro Grants funded regional participation.
* Participants used the Outreach Dashboard and hashtags #1Lib1Ref and #1Lib1RefNG to track contributions.
* Muhdavdullahi earned 1st place with 90.19 points and a ₦100,000 gift voucher.
* Sardeeq earned 2nd place with 84.89 points and a ₦70,000 gift voucher.
* Timzy D’Great earned 3rd place with 65.44 points and a ₦50,000 gift voucher.
* The organizing team consisted of Halima Waziri, Ayokanmi, and Bibisuccess.
Executive Summary
The #1Lib1RefNG 2026 campaign was a month-long initiative directed by the Wikimedia User Group Nigeria to improve the verifiability of Wikipedia through the addition of missing citations. By integrating a nationwide competition with educational outreach, the program engaged librarians and knowledge enthusiasts across Nigeria. The strategy combined virtual onboarding, specialized in-person training at Ahmadu Bello University, and decentralized edit-a-thons supported by Community Micro Grants.
Participation was tracked via the Outreach Dashboard, with a points-based system determining the top three contributors, who received gift vouchers ranging from ₦50,000 to ₦100,000. This collaborative effort between Wikimedians and professional bodies like the Nigerian Library Association sought to institutionalize a standard of reliability for open-access information. While the campaign reports successful regional reach through various city-based networks, the specific total number of citations added remains unspecified.
Full Take
This narrative presents the strongest case for the democratization of knowledge curation. By pivoting from a centralized editing model to one involving professional librarians and regional networks, the initiative leverages institutional credibility to solve the systemic problem of "citation gaps" in open-knowledge platforms. It effectively transforms the act of referencing from a chore into a competitive, gamified social event.
The source is structured as a community success report, utilizing a a specific set of metrics (points and vouchers) to validate efficacy. Because this is an internal promotional summary of a volunteer-led event, it employs a celebratory tone that focuses on activity (trainings, meetings) rather than outcome (the actual net increase in article reliability or the quality of the sources added).
Rooted in the paradigm of "Open Knowledge," this effort echoes global movements to decentralize information authority. The assumption is that increasing the volume of citations automatically correlates with increased reliability. While this generally holds true for Wikipedia's architecture, the second-order effect is a shift in power: the "gatekeepers" of truth are moving from traditional library archives to those who can most efficiently navigate the intersection of digital tools and academic sourcing.
Patterns detected: none
If this were an influence campaign, a bad actor would use "Borrowed Credibility" by partnering with respected national institutions to mask the insertion of biased or fabricated references into the global record. However, the transparency of the hashtags and the use of standardized Wikimedia tools suggest a genuine community effort rather than a coordinated manipulation.
Bridge Questions:
1. Does the gamification of citations prioritize quantity of references over the academic quality of the sources?
2. How does the participation of professional librarians change the nature of Wikipedia's "neutral point of view" (NPOV) policy?
3. What metrics, beyond contributor points, would truly prove that the reliability of Nigerian-related content has improved?