The narrative presented by CISA and Stryker paints a picture of a contained, albeit disruptive, cyberattack originating from Iran-aligned actors. However, the framing subtly reinforces existing geopolitical tensions and creates a potentially dangerous focus on nation-state adversaries as the primary threat. The emphasis on “God-like” administrative keys, while accurate, leans heavily into a vulnerability narrative—a classic “boiling the ocean” approach that risks diverting attention from more sy...