On September 15, Mongolia’s parliament, the State Great Khural, began its autumn session – and it started full throttle. The incumbent government headed by Prime Minister Uchral Nyam-Osor has an ambitious agenda that saw it propose one of the largest state budgets. Among its goals: establishing a sovereign wealth fund, securing energy from China, and building data centers. Parliament will likely scrutinize many of these big initiatives.
The State Great Khural has much to decide, but it is operating within a highly politically divided environment. Mongolia is still wrangling with government instability that began with the ousting of Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai’s administration in June 2025. Uchral’s government only took office on March 31 of this year – less than six months ago.
When parliament convened on September 15, the new government revealed one of the largest state budget proposals in Mongolia’s history, asking for 41.3 trillion tugrik, with a deficit of 2.3 trillion tugrik. Economists and skeptics worry that, with inflation standing at 12.5 percent, such a large deficit will only increase Mongolia’s debt, forcing the government to increase taxes on businesses and individuals. The state budget proposal has already faced massive scrutiny within the parliamentary committees. In a warning sign for Uchral’s government, parliament failed to reach the required quorum last week.
One of the major issues with the 2027 state budget proposal is the 2.3 trillion tugrik deficit. One of the solutions the Uchral government proposed is to utilize the increased Oyu Tolgoi dividend.
On September 11, Mongolia and Rio Tinto agreed to amend the Oyu Tolgoi contract, the Shareholder’s Agreement that was first established 17 years ago. The amendment will allow Mongolia to receive 13 trillion tugrik, approximately $3.6 billion. Uchral also announced that Rio Tinto agreed to reduce operational costs by approximately 30 trillion tugrik, an equivalent of $8.4 billion.
While the Mongolian parliament has to review another state budget amid the constant changes of government, a second issue that will face major scrutiny is the establishment of Mongolia’s Sovereign Wealth Fund. Under the Oyun-Erdene administration, in 2024, the Parliament of Mongolia passed new laws on a Sovereign Wealth Fund. In February 2026, just before it was forced from office, the Zandanshatar Gombojav government signed a preliminary agreement with companies to allocate 60 percent of the benefits from Mongolia’s strategic deposits to the Sovereign Wealth Fund as a new profit-sharing mechanism meant to benefit the public.
The current trajectory and the goal of the Sovereign Wealth Fund, however, may have pivoted from Mongolia’s welfare system, which would have directly benefited the public. The fund is now leaning more toward a corporate governance structure.
The initiative is now part of a larger reform in Mongolia’s state-owned companies. To support this reform, on September 10, Mongolia signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the U.S.-based BlackRock Financial Markets Advisory. BlackRock and the Mongolian government outlined a general framework that looks to explore selling shares in state-owned enterprises in both domestic and international capital markets.
After the MoU was signed, critics asked whether BlackRock’s corporate model – the restructuring of Mongolia’s state-owned enterprises – aligns with the country’s semi-welfare system. The government will need to have access to those funds to provide public assistance to the elderly, the disabled, children, the poor, and for public education and health. These welfare systems are indeed at the heart of Mongolian society today.
In 2025, Mongolia experienced intermittent protests and strikes from educators and medical workers, demanding a pay raise. If the Uchral government fails to deliver these promises, this wealth fund policy and priority changes will have a great impact on the Mongolian people who depend on these funds.
Beyond the financial wrangling, the issue of energy security looms over Mongolia. The Iran-U.S. war has roiled global energy markets, as have repeated Ukrainian attacks on Russian energy infrastructure. Mongolia is uniquely dependent on Russia for fuel, importing over 95 percent of refined petroleum products from its northern neighbor. When Russian supply dwindled, Mongolia felt the pinch. In the summer and fall of 2026, nationwide fuel shortages highlighted the country’s vulnerability and pushed policymakers to seek an additional source: China. In September, delegates from the Ministry of Industry and Mineral Resources held bilateral meetings with China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) to discuss importing 10,000 tonnes of refined petroleum, 4,000 tonnes of jet fuel, and 3,000 tonnes of diesel.
Moreover, China is currently financing one of Mongolia’s first hydropower plants, Erdeneburen Project in Khovd province. With a Chinese soft loan line of approximately $288 million, the construction contract was awarded to Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) and PowerChina in 2023.
In mid-September, Mongolian President Khurelsukh Ukhnaa and officials inspected the progress on the construction of the Erdeneburen Hydropower Plant. The Office of the President announced that the project is now 40 percent complete. When finished, the plant will have the capacity to supply reliable electricity to five provinces, including Khovd, Bayan-Ulgii, Uvs, Zavkhan, and Govi Altai.
Considering Mongolia’s energy infrastructure, combined with the landlocked challenges, full energy independence may not be in the cards as a short or medium term goal. That said, managing fuel shortages by reaching out to diverse global partners is in the national interest. Even prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Mongolia experienced intermittent energy shortages, which motivated the government to seek third-neighbor investments and diversify energy sources.
In August, Mongolia’s Deputy Prime Minister Dorjkhand Togmid announced Mongolia’s interest in building data centers in connection with accelerating Mongolia’s renewable energy sources. While the initiative is an attempt to kill two birds with one stone, even before discussing investment opportunities, Mongolia will need to decide how to handle data centers’ demand not only for energy, but for water.
According to the Brookings Institution, “A typical data center uses 300,000 gallons of water each day… but large data centers can use an estimated 5 million gallons of water each day.” The study warned: “Building a new facility and pledging economic impact mean little without sustainably incorporating water resources into ongoing operations.”
In 2025, an OECD study on water resources highlighted Mongolia’s water scarcity. Mongolia’s geographic disparities as well as surface water distribution make constructing – let alone maintaining – data centers a highly questionable endeavor.
The Uchral government is viewing China’s data centers in Inner Mongolia as a template and following the global trend. However, despite the similarities in wind and solar capacity and the cold climate, the water issue is one of the most important areas that needs to be scrutinized before Mongolia moves forward.
The State Great Khural has entered another highly politicized season with much to resolve. Unfortunately, the internal feud within the Mongolian People’s Party (MPP) will continue to weaken the parliament’s function. The MPP, the nominal ruling party with 68 total seats, is now effectively divided into two blocs of 30 and 38 legislators.
The Uchral government’s proposals are supposed to bring Mongolia economic prosperity and development, but without truly addressing the long-standing challenges of corruption, air pollution, water shortages, and energy security, the people’s confidence in governance remains extremely fragile. What the Mongolian people need is lawmakers and a government that prioritize the well-being of its citizens – not political vendettas.
Facts Only
* Mongolia’s parliament began its autumn session on September 15.
* The incumbent government proposed a state budget requesting 41.3 trillion tugrik with a deficit of 2.3 trillion tugrik.
* Inflation stood at 12.5 percent.
* The government proposed establishing a sovereign wealth fund, securing energy from China, and building data centers.
* Mongolia and Rio Tinto agreed to amend the Oyu Tolgoi contract in September 2025.
* Mongolia was allocated 13 trillion tugrik from the Oyu Tolgoi amendment.
* Rio Tinto agreed to reduce operational costs by 30 trillion tugrik.
* The government signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with BlackRock Financial Markets Advisory on September 10, 2025.
* A preliminary agreement was signed in February 2026 regarding allocating 60 percent of strategic deposit benefits to the Sovereign Wealth Fund.
* Bilateral meetings were held with China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) in September to discuss petroleum imports.
* The Erdeneburen Hydropower Plant is 40 percent complete.
Executive Summary
The Mongolian parliament began its autumn session on September 15, 2025, reviewing the incumbent government led by Prime Minister Uchral Nyam-Osor’s ambitious agenda. The government proposed one of Mongolia’s largest state budgets, requesting 41.3 trillion tugrik, resulting in a deficit of 2.3 trillion tugrik. Skeptics worry this deficit will increase national debt given the 12.5 percent inflation rate. Key proposals include establishing a sovereign wealth fund, securing energy from China, and building data centers.
Negotiations regarding state assets also occurred: Mongolia and Rio Tinto amended the Oyu Tolgoi contract, allowing Mongolia to receive 13 trillion tugrik, while Rio Tinto agreed to reduce operational costs by 30 trillion tugrik. A major focus is the proposed Sovereign Wealth Fund, which may shift from public welfare to a corporate governance structure, supported by an agreement with BlackRock regarding potential state-owned enterprise share sales. Energy security remains a critical issue, driven by dependence on Russia, leading to discussions with China for petroleum imports and hydropower financing. Furthermore, the planned development of data centers raises concerns regarding water scarcity in Mongolia.
Full Take
The narrative presents a tension between ambitious economic development, driven by state-led initiatives like sovereign wealth creation and foreign investment, and the underlying fragility of governance and resource management. A key pattern emerges in the pivot of policy goals: the Sovereign Wealth Fund initiative, initially framed for public welfare, is transitioning toward corporate governance structures facilitated by external actors like BlackRock, raising questions about whether these changes serve genuine national well-being or capital interests. This mirrors the broader dynamic where immediate economic demands (like debt servicing) are pursued alongside long-term structural shifts (energy diversification and infrastructure development).
The focus on energy security highlights a critical vulnerability: reliance on single neighbors while pursuing diversification introduces new geopolitical dependencies. Simultaneously, the push for data centers introduces an unseen constraint—water scarcity—that is deliberately sidelined in favor of immediate infrastructural goals. This juxtaposition suggests a pattern where macro-level financial and physical projects are advanced by prioritizing perceived growth trajectories over addressing underlying systemic constraints like environmental limits or social welfare obligations.
The internal political division within the ruling party further complicates this, suggesting that policy execution is constrained by internal political fissures rather than purely rational economic choices. The cost of pursuing these large-scale transformations—economic risk, environmental externalities (water), and social cohesion—is implicitly deferred to the public, creating a situation where governmental focus risks being captured by factional maneuvering rather than prioritizing citizen well-being as stated in the concluding reflections.
What factors are being deliberately deprioritized in the pursuit of these large economic shifts? How do structural dependencies (energy imports, data center water use) inherently shape the legitimacy of sovereign decisions made under duress? What mechanism exists to ensure that promises of prosperity translate into tangible security for populations facing existing socio-economic deficits?
Sentinel — Human
The analysis is strongly human-written, displaying the characteristic depth and specific focus found in investigative reporting, skillfully connecting financial, energy, and governance issues within a complex geopolitical context.
